Ghetto Gospel wrote:Guano wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Perfect example. Jimmits constant spamming and lack of arguments did him in. We gave him plenty of leeway.
Chanel is not a troll and brought in well thought out arguments. Don’t think he ever even got a warning or ban. He brings great content to the forum that sparks legit debates.
So that’s the difference. A ton of people had bad things to say about RJ and weren’t banned.
KAT vs Randle can def be argued, just doesn’t belong in every single thread. A ton of people bring up Kats flaws which are certainly fair game. People could talk about Thibs flaws, Brunsons flaws, you can talk about Mikals flaws, etc as they are relevant to the games being played.
The Randle talk just spammed too often in too many threads that weren’t even about Randle. A lot of times they weren’t even arguments and just troll bait posts which was the bigger issue. I mean, we even did let a lot of these things go on, but like Icarus flying towards the sun they just took it too far.
I agree Chanel isnt a troll. He is an intelligent poster who "knows ball" but he was harassed and labeled a troll by the same posters here who strongly disagreed with his takes.
And to the point which you brought up i. Your first post being whats the limit and range that is acceptable is the issue here. Cause some posters would let the fck thibs ammo fly and rarely was it met with derision but any randle > kat stuff would send posters.
The problem is a lot of the posters complaining about it did the same sht. As evidence by the lack of self awareness by certain posters in this thread.
And honestly like ICH said this issue really doesn't bother me as much as mods jumping on post with a wall of blue text cause its "derailing".
circling back real quick we're going to argue thibs vs new coach all year and this kat vs randle, gallo vs chandler, ect, ect will live on cause thats whats we do here. We pick sides (except me cause I like to be allusive)
not to be a fed and lord knows i've never reported anyone but the same posters complaining about it, are doing it right now in the knicks coaching search thread.
I don't see anyone derailing that thread and lying about or insulting each other in that thread. When it has gone off course some of us have tried steering he conversation back to the topic. I know I have, perhaps you should provide the example or go ahead and see what happens if you report that behavior. I don't see it.