ImageImageImageImageImage

Options for This Offseason

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

Warriors Options This Offseason

Blow it up - this team is done. too old. too draymond. too much robin, not enough batman.
5
15%
Work around the edges - good enough to win it all with the right role players (need a new otto porter and beli)
13
39%
Make 1 semi-major trade - either Butler for KD (or that level) or Dray + a few assets for an all-star or all-nba player.
6
18%
Go All-In - push all the picks, young players, salary for Giannis or another top 10 player to pair with Curry for a few years.
9
27%
 
Total votes: 33

vvoland
Starter
Posts: 2,039
And1: 437
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#121 » by vvoland » Wed Jun 18, 2025 6:41 pm

EvanZ wrote:Aldama is not a starting center.


Our starting center is a weird position that, on the most important nights, won't close. We really need a backup quality big to eat some starter minutes to keep the wear and tear on Dray to a min. I think most in the org are fine with Post in that role to start next season. I don't know if I disagree.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,471
And1: 3,997
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#122 » by EvanZ » Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:22 pm

vvoland wrote:
EvanZ wrote:Aldama is not a starting center.


Our starting center is a weird position that, on the most important nights, won't close. We really need a backup quality big to eat some starter minutes to keep the wear and tear on Dray to a min. I think most in the org are fine with Post in that role to start next season. I don't know if I disagree.


Their plan might be "Let's pray we can start Post and play him 20 mpg in the regular season and still win 50 games and just get a 6 or 7 seed again".
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 12,938
And1: 15,101
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#123 » by whatisacenter » Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:30 pm

EvanZ wrote:
vvoland wrote:
EvanZ wrote:Aldama is not a starting center.


Our starting center is a weird position that, on the most important nights, won't close. We really need a backup quality big to eat some starter minutes to keep the wear and tear on Dray to a min. I think most in the org are fine with Post in that role to start next season. I don't know if I disagree.


Their plan might be "Let's pray we can start Post and play him 20 mpg in the regular season and still win 50 games and just get a 6 or 7 seed again".


Yeah, as long as Draymond is on the roster, the Warriors are not going to invest in a center just to have them ride the pine once the post season starts.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
DAWill1128
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,637
And1: 1,944
Joined: Jun 17, 2004
   

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#124 » by DAWill1128 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 10:07 am

I would like to try and see if we can get Goga Bitadze with that 8.8 million traded player exception. He's a big guy that likes to mix it up inside, decent touch, can pass and keep the ball moving.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 36,920
And1: 32,131
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#125 » by AirP. » Sat Jun 21, 2025 2:39 pm

One option mentioned, blow past the 2nd apron by overpaying players they resign like Looney & GPII on inflated 1+1contract (+1 so there's no veto rights) to give you a bigger amount of money to trade for later on in the season (say an expiring contract + asset)... if money isn't an issue for ownership.

Read on Twitter
TB
General Manager
Posts: 9,479
And1: 1,367
Joined: Mar 11, 2007

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#126 » by TB » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:10 pm

AirP. wrote:One option mentioned, blow past the 2nd apron by overpaying players they resign like Looney & GPII on inflated 1+1contract (+1 so there's no veto rights) to give you a bigger amount of money to trade for later on in the season (say an expiring contract + asset)... if money isn't an issue for ownership.

Read on Twitter


If they are over the 2nd apron they can't combine salaries in a trade.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 36,920
And1: 32,131
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#127 » by AirP. » Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:21 pm

TB wrote:
AirP. wrote:One option mentioned, blow past the 2nd apron by overpaying players they resign like Looney & GPII on inflated 1+1contract (+1 so there's no veto rights) to give you a bigger amount of money to trade for later on in the season (say an expiring contract + asset)... if money isn't an issue for ownership.

Read on Twitter


If they are over the 2nd apron they can't combine salaries in a trade.

Right, so if you overpay players like Looney or GPII you can trade for players under their salary based on the other team's apron rules (if they have any). On overpaying the players, if you go past 120% of their last year's pay you then can only get back half their salary. So, it would seem GPII could be paid 10.9 mil and Looney 9.6, so later in the season they could be traded individually for player(s) who combined for less than their salaries, you could also send draft compensation. So basically, you'd send a ~10 million expiring contract with maybe draft compensation for a less than 10-million-dollar player, possibly on a longer contract. This method is very expensive since GS is already in the repeater tax.

Now, they do talk about what can be done to stay out of the apron and how that could affect how they can acquire talent for this next year.
vvoland
Starter
Posts: 2,039
And1: 437
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#128 » by vvoland » Sat Jun 21, 2025 7:25 pm

Retaining loon and gp2 at 10m to use in trades seems like a terrible gamble. I'm guessing they get close to the 2nd apron but don't breach it
TB
General Manager
Posts: 9,479
And1: 1,367
Joined: Mar 11, 2007

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#129 » by TB » Sat Jun 21, 2025 7:46 pm

AirP. wrote:
TB wrote:
AirP. wrote:One option mentioned, blow past the 2nd apron by overpaying players they resign like Looney & GPII on inflated 1+1contract (+1 so there's no veto rights) to give you a bigger amount of money to trade for later on in the season (say an expiring contract + asset)... if money isn't an issue for ownership.

Read on Twitter


If they are over the 2nd apron they can't combine salaries in a trade.

Right, so if you overpay players like Looney or GPII you can trade for players under their salary based on the other team's apron rules (if they have any). On overpaying the players, if you go past 120% of their last year's pay you then can only get back half their salary. So, it would seem GPII could be paid 10.9 mil and Looney 9.6, so later in the season they could be traded individually for player(s) who combined for less than their salaries, you could also send draft compensation. So basically, you'd send a ~10 million expiring contract with maybe draft compensation for a less than 10-million-dollar player, possibly on a longer contract. This method is very expensive since GS is already in the repeater tax.

Now, they do talk about what can be done to stay out of the apron and how that could affect how they can acquire talent for this next year.


Gotcha, thanks for the context. I figured in the video they wouldn’t just ignore the apron rules, but couldn’t find that part.

My guess is warriors will sign Kuminga, use TPMLE and vet minimums and stay just under the 2nd apron so they can have some flexibility at the deadline if needed… unless of course some miracle sign and trade presents itself, but that seems unlikely.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 36,920
And1: 32,131
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#130 » by AirP. » Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:45 pm

vvoland wrote:Retaining loon and gp2 at 10m to use in trades seems like a terrible gamble. I'm guessing they get close to the 2nd apron but don't breach it

You don't think they could get a better fit than GP2 or Looney at around ~10 mil each with a 2nd or even a 1st attached to the package? So PG2 at 10.9 could get you any combo or single player under his salary...Wendell Carter Jr, L.Ball, R.O'Neal, D. Jones Jr, C.Martin (either twin), N.Marshall, J.Smith, Bitadze, Niang, KJ Martin, M.Christie, Coulibaly , K.Williams, M.Williams, S.Bey (missing last year), J.Hardy, H.Highsmith, K.Dunn or Kessler.

GS could just send multiple 1sts to grab a younger player who hasn't hit their 2nd contract yet.

You never know who will fall out of contention and decide to rebuild before the deadline. If you're sending out multiple first I would suspect you're adding a player who will help going into the post-Curry era much easier.
vvoland
Starter
Posts: 2,039
And1: 437
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#131 » by vvoland » Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:54 am

AirP. wrote:
vvoland wrote:Retaining loon and gp2 at 10m to use in trades seems like a terrible gamble. I'm guessing they get close to the 2nd apron but don't breach it

You don't think they could get a better fit than GP2 or Looney at around ~10 mil each with a 2nd or even a 1st attached to the package? So PG2 at 10.9 could get you any combo or single player under his salary...Wendell Carter Jr, L.Ball, R.O'Neal, D. Jones Jr, C.Martin (either twin), N.Marshall, J.Smith, Bitadze, Niang, KJ Martin, M.Christie, Coulibaly , K.Williams, M.Williams, S.Bey (missing last year), J.Hardy, H.Highsmith, K.Dunn or Kessler.

GS could just send multiple 1sts to grab a younger player who hasn't hit their 2nd contract yet.

You never know who will fall out of contention and decide to rebuild before the deadline. If you're sending out multiple first I would suspect you're adding a player who will help going into the post-Curry era much easier.


Trading two firsts would leave the warriors without enough assets to do anything else. No one on that list looks like the final piece to this puzzle.

If we go all in (trading multiple firsts and enough salary) I think they need a trey murphy level player. Not likely but that's what I'd try to get - a young player with all star upside. Bane is another example but his contact was too much. I think we can get to trey's number without giving up dray or jk.

A pick + podz and moody should be good enough to get someone like Monk - a 6th man of the year type. MM is someone I would absolutely ask about this summer.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,830
And1: 2,178
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#132 » by Upperclass » Sun Jun 22, 2025 4:46 pm

Warriors didnt want to move Draymond..
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,212
And1: 17,298
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#133 » by floppymoose » Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:18 pm

The recent Durant trade was what should have been done with Steph. HOU was such a natural trade partner for a team with an aging HoFer. And Steph would have fit them even better than KD.

Had they done that instead of adding JB, they would have Jalen Green and Kuminga to lead the tank, the number 10 pick from the trade, and their own pick which would have been around 15.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,830
And1: 2,178
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#134 » by Upperclass » Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:31 pm

You don’t trade Steph.. He walks. You also don’t trade Steph before Draymond or Jimmy..
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,212
And1: 17,298
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#135 » by floppymoose » Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:11 pm

In my scenario, JB was never here.

If i were GM, I trade anybody when it is the right move for the team.
vvoland
Starter
Posts: 2,039
And1: 437
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#136 » by vvoland » Sun Jun 22, 2025 9:31 pm

floppymoose wrote:The recent Durant trade was what should have been done with Steph. HOU was such a natural trade partner for a team with an aging HoFer. And Steph would have fit them even better than KD.

Had they done that instead of adding JB, they would have Jalen Green and Kuminga to lead the tank, the number 10 pick from the trade, and their own pick which would have been around 15.


That sounds terrible. Why would we do that unless Steph demands it? You want to get an early start to the tank with the incentive being the #10 and our own late lottery pick? I have no interest in watching bad basketball and we'll all have to soon enough. Is it not soon enough?
User avatar
Senchu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,907
And1: 426
Joined: Sep 03, 2009

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#137 » by Senchu » Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:11 pm

Would you want Bradley Beal if Suns buy him out?
donkeylips
Analyst
Posts: 3,129
And1: 1,472
Joined: Apr 22, 2010

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#138 » by donkeylips » Mon Jun 23, 2025 1:27 am

Yes
I can hawk a loogie eight feet in the air and catch it with my tongue.
statsman
Analyst
Posts: 3,465
And1: 535
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#139 » by statsman » Mon Jun 23, 2025 2:18 am

Senchu wrote:Would you want Bradley Beal if Suns buy him out?

A buyout of Beal would cost the Suns $22M/yr for FIVE years. I can't see them doing that.
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 12,938
And1: 15,101
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Options for This Offseason 

Post#140 » by whatisacenter » Mon Jun 23, 2025 3:44 am

Senchu wrote:Would you want Bradley Beal if Suns buy him out?


Sure, why not?

The team need a rim running 3 pt shooting big and a backup PG that can be a POA defender.

He could fill both of those rolls for Kerr.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe

Return to Golden State Warriors