Skybox wrote:CarraT wrote:Skybox wrote:I really like NAW as a player, but i question the value of him as a target for the MLE…he might be an even better KCP at a lower salary, but I don’t think that profile is a worthy priority for that chunk of salary. I’d much rather draft a guy like Drake Powell or Sion James with a srp and hope they can contribute- at least on the defensive end, in the same way. NAW’s offensive contributions are nice, but not really substantial…just like KCP…good player, good fit, happy to have him, BUT if I only have one swing at a FA acquisition, I still need more offense & playmaking as a priority for our thin bench…I’m not sure who is the best target, but someone more in the playing style\skillset of Monk, Schroeder, Ivey…I suppose you could make the argument that drafting Clayton might do that, but I’m reluctant to believe a rookie will contribute offensively as quickly.
Not to mention that we have AB, who is very similar to NAW, already on board.
I’ll take NAW over Schröder every day of the week.
And a player like Monk is not available for MLE.
Geez…read it again but slower, I’m talking about “types” and redundancy not those specific guys so much.
NAW > Schroder in a vacuum, so is KCP…not the point I was making. We have AB, why duplicate him while we still lack scoring pop from a reserve guard.
AB doesn’t duplicate NAW. Let’s avoid the loop and just go to the ultimate expert: NBA 2K.
Anthony Black
Position: PG/SG
Archetype: Defensive Menace
NAW
Position: SG/SF
Archetype: Two-Way Three-Level Shot Creator
Their strengths complement each other. Defensively, they’d form a versatile, disruptive backcourt. Offensively, NAW brings self-creation at all three levels with a smoother jumper and better shot profile. AB, on the other hand, is a downhill playmaker. More pick-and-roll, drive-and-kick, connector-type.
AB sets the table. NAW finishes the meal.
And to be clear, AB is already the better player. Don’t get it twisted.