Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,372
And1: 5,992
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#81 » by gswhoops » Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:42 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
Wizop wrote:
What would the Pels gain by waiting?


He's implying that Haliburton is going to suffer a far more serious injury because it once happened to this other guy and so the Pels should hold the 26 pick because the Pacers will play a season without Hali.

Stretchhhhhhhhhhhh


Awkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkward

:o
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,863
And1: 11,698
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#82 » by eminence » Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:43 pm

Yep, some variant of that was the danger.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,401
And1: 5,088
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#83 » by Wizop » Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:46 pm

As Bill Polian used to say quoting Marv Levy - if whatever you did didn't work, you should've done the other thing.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
meridian
Ballboy
Posts: 20
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 20, 2022
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#84 » by meridian » Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:08 pm

esvl wrote:
esvl wrote:Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move

Exactly what happened. NOLA should fire their stupid GM effective inmidiately.


I do find it odd that NO was willing to do this trade at the time they did it even sitting aside the potential of Haliburton tearing his achilles. Pick 23 is low enough where I expect teams only want it for a specific player and you wouldn't trade for it until that pick is on the clock. From that standpoint I don't understand it.

From the perspective that they just lost out on a lottery pick in 2026 I don't think that will be the case. While the Pacers cannot contend without Haliburton they should still finish in the top 8 of the east if they keep most of the current group intact. The Pacers owner has never been willing to tank. Prior to the Pacers picking Bennedict Mathurin #6 in 2022 they had not had a pick inside the top 10 since 1988 when they pick Rik Smits #2. Plus, the city was really behind this current group with the run they just had. I think they will at least try to make the best of a bad situation in 2025-2026 and the chances of them having a significantly worse pick than 23 are not that good, IMO.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,372
And1: 5,992
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#85 » by gswhoops » Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:11 pm

meridian wrote:
esvl wrote:
esvl wrote:Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move

Exactly what happened. NOLA should fire their stupid GM effective inmidiately.


I do find it odd that NO was willing to do this trade at the time they did it even sitting aside the potential of Haliburton tearing his achilles. Pick 23 is low enough where I expect teams only want it for a specific player and you wouldn't trade for it until that pick is on the clock. From that standpoint I don't understand it.

From the perspective that they just lost out on a lottery pick in 2026 I don't think that will be the case. While the Pacers cannot contend without Haliburton they should still finish in the top 8 of the east if they keep most of the current group intact. The Pacers owner has never been willing to tank. Prior to the Pacers picking Bennedict Mathurin #6 in 2022 they had not had a pick inside the top 10 since 1988 when they pick Rik Smits #2. Plus, the city was really behind this current group with the run they just had. I think they will at least try to make the best of a bad situation in 2025-2026 and the chances of them having a significantly worse pick than 23 are not that good, IMO.

Top 8 is generally less relevant these days, if they're not in the top 6 I think it's still fair to call it a potential lottery pick.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,401
And1: 5,088
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#86 » by Wizop » Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:26 pm

meridian wrote:The Pacers owner has never been willing to tank.


I wonder if Indy and OKC are similar in this regard. big markets like NYC and LA sell lots of tickets to businesses who buy them to give to customers and their purchase decision doesn't depend upon how good the team is. here in Indy most of the ticket buyers are regular fans. that's why the fieldhouse was so loud and I'm guessing it is why it is equally loud in OKC. the Pacer owner lost a lot of money in the years after the brawl when people got turned off and didn't renew their seats. (no boo hoos necessary as the worth of the franchise has skyrocketed). we had a winning home record for almost 30 years in a row. trying to win is necessary to sell tickets.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,693
And1: 13,929
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#87 » by Scoot McGroot » Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:53 pm

Wizop wrote:
meridian wrote:The Pacers owner has never been willing to tank.


I wonder if Indy and OKC are similar in this regard. big markets like NYC and LA sell lots of tickets to businesses who buy them to give to customers and their purchase decision doesn't depend upon how good the team is. here in Indy most of the ticket buyers are regular fans. that's why the fieldhouse was so loud and I'm guessing it is why it is equally loud in OKC. the Pacer owner lost a lot of money in the years after the brawl when people got turned off and didn't renew their seats. (no boo hoos necessary as the worth of the franchise has skyrocketed). we had a winning home record for almost 30 years in a row. trying to win is necessary to sell tickets.



Also, at this point, Herb Simon is 90 years old. Can’t imagine he wants to do anything other than keep trying to get close, and certainly not make trades that sets you for “3 years out at the earliest”. He may not have 3 years. :dontknow:
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,401
And1: 5,088
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#88 » by Wizop » Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:01 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, at this point, Herb Simon is 90 years old. Can’t imagine he wants to do anything other than keep trying to get close, and certainly not make trades that sets you for “3 years out at the earliest”. He may not have 3 years. :dontknow:


but his son does and he's moving into the chair
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,881
And1: 15,071
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#89 » by Laimbeer » Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:05 pm

With Hali out this seems wise for the Pacers.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,345
And1: 6,828
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#90 » by MasterIchiro » Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:12 pm

gswhoops wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
He's implying that Haliburton is going to suffer a far more serious injury because it once happened to this other guy and so the Pels should hold the 26 pick because the Pacers will play a season without Hali.

Stretchhhhhhhhhhhh


Awkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkward

:o


Class dismissed.
It has been written...
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,693
And1: 13,929
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#91 » by Scoot McGroot » Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:40 pm

Wizop wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:Also, at this point, Herb Simon is 90 years old. Can’t imagine he wants to do anything other than keep trying to get close, and certainly not make trades that sets you for “3 years out at the earliest”. He may not have 3 years. :dontknow:


but his son does and he's moving into the chair


But Herb probably wants to see them win one before he dies.
esvl
Starter
Posts: 2,209
And1: 630
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#92 » by esvl » Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:42 pm

meridian wrote:
esvl wrote:
esvl wrote:Was Ind 1st 26 protected? If not, the Pels FO made a strange move

Exactly what happened. NOLA should fire their stupid GM effective inmidiately.


I do find it odd that NO was willing to do this trade at the time they did it even sitting aside the potential of Haliburton tearing his achilles. Pick 23 is low enough where I expect teams only want it for a specific player and you wouldn't trade for it until that pick is on the clock. From that standpoint I don't understand it.

From the perspective that they just lost out on a lottery pick in 2026 I don't think that will be the case. While the Pacers cannot contend without Haliburton they should still finish in the top 8 of the east if they keep most of the current group intact. The Pacers owner has never been willing to tank. Prior to the Pacers picking Bennedict Mathurin #6 in 2022 they had not had a pick inside the top 10 since 1988 when they pick Rik Smits #2. Plus, the city was really behind this current group with the run they just had. I think they will at least try to make the best of a bad situation in 2025-2026 and the chances of them having a significantly worse pick than 23 are not that good, IMO.
This draft is weak, so what was the point for NO to give up all the chances to get the 5-22 pick in the next strong draft? Somebody fd up.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,345
And1: 6,828
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Official [Shams] Pacers trade #23 to New Orleans 

Post#93 » by MasterIchiro » Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:45 pm

esvl wrote:
meridian wrote:
esvl wrote:Exactly what happened. NOLA should fire their stupid GM effective inmidiately.


I do find it odd that NO was willing to do this trade at the time they did it even sitting aside the potential of Haliburton tearing his achilles. Pick 23 is low enough where I expect teams only want it for a specific player and you wouldn't trade for it until that pick is on the clock. From that standpoint I don't understand it.

From the perspective that they just lost out on a lottery pick in 2026 I don't think that will be the case. While the Pacers cannot contend without Haliburton they should still finish in the top 8 of the east if they keep most of the current group intact. The Pacers owner has never been willing to tank. Prior to the Pacers picking Bennedict Mathurin #6 in 2022 they had not had a pick inside the top 10 since 1988 when they pick Rik Smits #2. Plus, the city was really behind this current group with the run they just had. I think they will at least try to make the best of a bad situation in 2025-2026 and the chances of them having a significantly worse pick than 23 are not that good, IMO.
This draft is weak, so what was the point for NO to give up all the chances to get the 5-22 pick in the next strong draft? Somebody fd up.


That would be Joe Dumars. His phone must be blowing up with trade proposals.
It has been written...

Return to Trades and Transactions