pepe1991 wrote:Gafford off the table.
Not necessarily. He’s immediately tradable with no 6 month restriction.
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird
pepe1991 wrote:Gafford off the table.
Redick07 wrote:It seems like Kings put Malik Monk on the trading block and they want 2025 FRP for returning.
A trade like Isaac, Jett and #25 for Monk will improve our bench shooting. Monk is better than Walter Clayton for now.
zaymon wrote:Redick07 wrote:It seems like Kings put Malik Monk on the trading block and they want 2025 FRP for returning.
A trade like Isaac, Jett and #25 for Monk will improve our bench shooting. Monk is better than Walter Clayton for now.
We cant get any thiner at forward. For the amount of minutes available free agent pg will be better. #25 is a good place in the draft. We can cover guard depth, shooting, or big man minutes.
I like Monk but with Bane trade it doeant make much sens
Max Power wrote:I love how everyone’s up in arms about not getting Simons. Whether it was a doable trade or not you’re overlooking a clear fact. The Magic never wanted him. That was the worst two years of fan trade fodder. They were never going to get him, and Bane was clearly the guy they wanted from the start.
bigdogdylan5 wrote:An interesting video to watch
I am sure most people just think I am a shill for the front office but I will say Kevin Clark does put it very well. The armchair GM stuff has gone completely out of control by blogs by twitter and by some of us. I am not saying you can’t criticize a front office decision or point out the downsides or risks with it. I just don’t get the jump to our FO are idiots and don’t know what they are doing. I just will never get to the point where I think I know more than people have dedicated their careers to basketball and eat sleep and breathe it everyday and get one of the most coveted limited jobs as lead decision maker of an NBA team.
Max Power wrote:I love how everyone’s up in arms about not getting Simons.
Knightro wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Gafford off the table.
Not necessarily. He’s immediately tradable with no 6 month restriction.
bigdogdylan5 wrote:An interesting video to watch
I am sure most people just think I am a shill for the front office but I will say Kevin Clark does put it very well. The armchair GM stuff has gone completely out of control by blogs by twitter and by some of us. I am not saying you can’t criticize a front office decision or point out the downsides or risks with it. I just don’t get the jump to our FO are idiots and don’t know what they are doing. I just will never get to the point where I think I know more than people have dedicated their careers to basketball and eat sleep and breathe it everyday and get one of the most coveted limited jobs as lead decision maker of an NBA team.
bigdogdylan5 wrote:An interesting video to watch
I am sure most people just think I am a shill for the front office but I will say Kevin Clark does put it very well. The armchair GM stuff has gone completely out of control by blogs by twitter and by some of us. I am not saying you can’t criticize a front office decision or point out the downsides or risks with it. I just don’t get the jump to our FO are idiots and don’t know what they are doing. I just will never get to the point where I think I know more than people have dedicated their careers to basketball and eat sleep and breathe it everyday and get one of the most coveted limited jobs as lead decision maker of an NBA team.
Magic might win the East.
VFX wrote:The Magic didn’t really overpay for Bane IF they buy that they are contenders for the next 4+ years with this move.
OrlandoMagic wrote:Serious question that might net me some stupid responses. But is there a limit on how far out you can trade your future 1st rd picks?
drsd wrote:Max Power wrote:I love how everyone’s up in arms about not getting Simons.
I loved Simons as the 1A choice. But now that Bane is in Magic blue by dumping low-end assets, I am more than 1A thrilled.
Basically the Magic now has a 4-year run at an NBA title. That was not true if Simons had come to Orlando.
bigdogdylan5 wrote:An interesting video to watch
I am sure most people just think I am a shill for the front office but I will say Kevin Clark does put it very well. The armchair GM stuff has gone completely out of control by blogs by twitter and by some of us. I am not saying you can’t criticize a front office decision or point out the downsides or risks with it. I just don’t get the jump to our FO are idiots and don’t know what they are doing. I just will never get to the point where I think I know more than people have dedicated their careers to basketball and eat sleep and breathe it everyday and get one of the most coveted limited jobs as lead decision maker of an NBA team.
Cammo101 wrote:OrlandoMagic wrote:Serious question that might net me some stupid responses. But is there a limit on how far out you can trade your future 1st rd picks?
There is in the NFL, but I don't think there is in the NBA.
Skybox wrote:Cammo101 wrote:OrlandoMagic wrote:Serious question that might net me some stupid responses. But is there a limit on how far out you can trade your future 1st rd picks?
There is in the NFL, but I don't think there is in the NBA.
There is a limit...In the NBA, teams can trade draft picks for the current year and the following seven years. For example, in 2025, teams can trade picks for the 2025 draft and up to the 2031 draft. This limitation is in place to prevent teams from trading away their entire future for short-term gains.