BOS—MIL—UTA
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
BOS—MIL—UTA
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 3,263
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
BOS—MIL—UTA
Celtics trade Porzingis + #28, receive Portis + Svi
Save $13.6MM this season.
Bucks trade Portis, receive Sexton
I have their value as a wash, but Sexton fills a more urgent position of need with Lillard out.
Jazz trade Sexton + Svi, receive Porzingis + #28
Take on additional salary for a late FRP.
Save $13.6MM this season.
Bucks trade Portis, receive Sexton
I have their value as a wash, but Sexton fills a more urgent position of need with Lillard out.
Jazz trade Sexton + Svi, receive Porzingis + #28
Take on additional salary for a late FRP.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,950
- And1: 15,688
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
Did Portis pick up his player option already?
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 3,263
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
BK_2020 wrote:Did Portis pick up his player option already?
Not that I know of. He would have to for this deal to happen, of course. Should have mentioned that.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,950
- And1: 15,688
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
Portis is not picking up a $13 mil option, right? Even if he doesn't get a raise, he can get additional years at least.
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,692
- And1: 13,928
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
SkyHook wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Did Portis pick up his player option already?
Not that I know of. He would have to for this deal to happen, of course. Should have mentioned that.
Not yet. CoJo and Gary Harris have been declined, and Middleton, Jevon Carter, and Pat Connaughton have exercised their options already. Thats all that’s come across the league wire so far.
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,882
- And1: 12,642
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
I don’t see Boston including an asset for this trade.
Porzingis is clearly the best player in the deal, and yes there is some real money saved, but not worth a first.
I wouldn’t hate if it the pick wasn’t involved but definitely not including a pick here.
Porzingis is clearly the best player in the deal, and yes there is some real money saved, but not worth a first.
I wouldn’t hate if it the pick wasn’t involved but definitely not including a pick here.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,768
- And1: 13,734
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
brackdan70 wrote:I don’t see Boston including an asset for this trade.
Porzingis is clearly the best player in the deal, and yes there is some real money saved, but not worth a first.
I wouldn’t hate if it the pick wasn’t involved but definitely not including a pick here.
Best ability is availability
Porzingis: 99 GP last 2 years
Portis 131 GP last 2 years
Sexton: 141 GP last 2 years
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,813
- And1: 9,223
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
BOS counters by saying find a team that will give up the pick to Utah for Sexton instead of them, presumably because that team would be sending out dead weight filler rather than a solid, functional player like Portis. In a year without Tatum, it's more valuable for BOS to keep #28 than it is to have Portis instead of a filler salary player.
Utah then conquers though by just cutting BOS out and getting their pick for Sexton with a smaller salary coming back.
Utah then conquers though by just cutting BOS out and getting their pick for Sexton with a smaller salary coming back.
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,974
- And1: 7,582
- Joined: Jun 14, 2013
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
I'm a big Portis fan so I'd do it but obviously try to keep the pick out of it if you could (or get a 2nd or two back etc.).
Portis feels like a steal at his option number though. I wonder if he decides to see what he can get on the market.
Portis feels like a steal at his option number though. I wonder if he decides to see what he can get on the market.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,882
- And1: 12,642
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
Godaddycurse wrote:brackdan70 wrote:I don’t see Boston including an asset for this trade.
Porzingis is clearly the best player in the deal, and yes there is some real money saved, but not worth a first.
I wouldn’t hate if it the pick wasn’t involved but definitely not including a pick here.
Best ability is availability
Porzingis: 99 GP last 2 years
Portis 131 GP last 2 years
Sexton: 141 GP last 2 years
Sexton doesn’t really matter here as the Cs are trading for Portis in this scenario. Yes availability means something, but it probably closes the gap in quality of player in this case.
If KP played an equal number of games then Bucks send a first or two.
He is a much better player when he is healthy.
The Cs are not sending a pick for this.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 959
- And1: 1,156
- Joined: Nov 18, 2020
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
I'm not interested in helping boston without a clear upgrade
and would also be really surprised if Bobby opts-in
and would also be really surprised if Bobby opts-in
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 3,263
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
brackdan70 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:brackdan70 wrote:I don’t see Boston including an asset for this trade.
Porzingis is clearly the best player in the deal, and yes there is some real money saved, but not worth a first.
I wouldn’t hate if it the pick wasn’t involved but definitely not including a pick here.
Best ability is availability
Porzingis: 99 GP last 2 years
Portis 131 GP last 2 years
Sexton: 141 GP last 2 years
Sexton doesn’t really matter here as the Cs are trading for Portis in this scenario. Yes availability means something, but it probably closes the gap in quality of player in this case.
If KP played an equal number of games then Bucks send a first or two.
He is a much better player when he is healthy.
The Cs are not sending a pick for this.
If the Celtics had even a reasonable expectation that Porzingis could stay healthy, then they shouldn't trade him at all. But potential trading partners have to take that into consideration and bake it into the value.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,692
- And1: 13,928
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
JonHeist wrote:I'm not interested in helping boston without a clear upgrade
and would also be really surprised if Bobby opts-in
I don’t know. It was a weird season for him. He wasn’t particularly great, and he had the PED suspension. Not a lot of cap room or a ton of mle’s for open spending. Could see him opt in and extend.

Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,044
- And1: 946
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: BOS—MIL—UTA
Not opposed to trading Portis, but Bobby is due for a pay day. It would be a S&T if they trade him.
Return to Trades and Transactions