ImageImageImageImageImage

Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,805
And1: 46,539
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1801 » by PhilBlackson » Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:57 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:I’m not f’ing feeling trading down to 19 with BKN for Cam smdh

Not another “but it’s only 10 spots” bs


I mean, it would be only 10 spots... :lol:


Which we seen can be the difference between drafting a damn good player like Nembhard vs a bust like Koloko lol
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* Wemby is HIM - Top 5 Player this year
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
Zeno
RealGM
Posts: 24,688
And1: 22,929
Joined: Jun 06, 2001
   

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1802 » by Zeno » Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:59 pm

The only thing I potentially like about this trade is that it would allow us to offer the full MLE to someone. So if we can get NAW, Cam, 19 for RJ and 9 then that would actually be pretty good. Similarly, maybe we can use the MLE as a trade exception and take on some salary and maybe another pick.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?

Please advise….

Dan G.
Zeno
RealGM
Posts: 24,688
And1: 22,929
Joined: Jun 06, 2001
   

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1803 » by Zeno » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:00 pm

PhilBlackson wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:I’m not f’ing feeling trading down to 19 with BKN for Cam smdh

Not another “but it’s only 10 spots” bs


I mean, it would be only 10 spots... :lol:


Which we seen can be the difference between drafting a damn good player like Nembhard vs a bust like Koloko lol

That was actually only 1 spot. lol. The other 9 were irrelevant.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?

Please advise….

Dan G.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 99,688
And1: 73,488
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1804 » by djsunyc » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:02 pm

Zeno wrote:The only thing I potentially like about this trade is that it would allow us to offer the full MLE to someone. So if we can get NAW, Cam, 19 for RJ and 9 then that would actually be pretty good. Similarly, maybe we can use the MLE as a trade exception and take on some salary and maybe another pick.


we'd still need some bigs but the added benefit of using the MLE by dumping an extra $6 mil of rj's deal would be nice. we'd also get a $6 mil trade exemption back.
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,801
And1: 9,878
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1805 » by Clutch0z24 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:02 pm

Read on Twitter


If we trade RJ + 9 For Cam + 19 i will be pretty disappointed...While Cam the better player hes not like a ceiling raising player.....He would not make us drastically better to give up 9th for....
Image
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,055
And1: 46,774
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1806 » by Tor_Raps » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:04 pm

Zeno wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
I mean, it would be only 10 spots... :lol:


Which we seen can be the difference between drafting a damn good player like Nembhard vs a bust like Koloko lol

That was actually only 1 spot. lol. The other 9 were irrelevant.


The other 9 spots are relevant because we were heavily interested in him and could have just drafted in the draft slot that was ours. The Thad trade was just so pathetic and perfectly describes the horrible 4 years from 2021 to now lol.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,404
And1: 23,651
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1807 » by ATLTimekeeper » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:05 pm

Trading the best player + the best pick to move down and pick up role players would be insane.
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,055
And1: 46,774
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1808 » by Tor_Raps » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:06 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:Trading the best player + the best pick to move down and pick up role players would be insane.


And the player is also 5 years younger loll
Zeno
RealGM
Posts: 24,688
And1: 22,929
Joined: Jun 06, 2001
   

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1809 » by Zeno » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:06 pm

djsunyc wrote:
Zeno wrote:The only thing I potentially like about this trade is that it would allow us to offer the full MLE to someone. So if we can get NAW, Cam, 19 for RJ and 9 then that would actually be pretty good. Similarly, maybe we can use the MLE as a trade exception and take on some salary and maybe another pick.


we'd still need some bigs but the added benefit of using the MLE by dumping an extra $6 mil of rj's deal would be nice. we'd also get a $6 mil trade exemption back.

We’d be freeing up the 6 million plus we’d be saving the difference in the rookie scale between 9 and 19. In addition, since we’d be hardcapped if we use the MLE, we’d also do away with 3.5 million of unlikely bonuses that apply to any hardcap. So there this quite a bit more flexibility gained from a trade like this than is immediately obvious.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?

Please advise….

Dan G.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 99,688
And1: 73,488
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1810 » by djsunyc » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:06 pm

let's say it's cam + #19.

then your starting 5 would be IQ, cam, BI, scottie, yak. that's more shooting today than it was yesterday.

btw, i don't believe the rumor :)
User avatar
Asif16
RealGM
Posts: 19,471
And1: 27,695
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
     

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1811 » by Asif16 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:08 pm

People acting like they know what the exact deal is. Raptors arent stupid to just do RJ + 9 for Cam + 19.

There would obviously be more Future 1sts involved in the deal too. Which wouldnt be terrible to acquire more assets for a big fish down the line (Giannis for example)
Zeno
RealGM
Posts: 24,688
And1: 22,929
Joined: Jun 06, 2001
   

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1812 » by Zeno » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:08 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
Zeno wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:
Which we seen can be the difference between drafting a damn good player like Nembhard vs a bust like Koloko lol

That was actually only 1 spot. lol. The other 9 were irrelevant.


The other 9 spots are relevant because we were heavily interested in him and could have just drafted in the draft slot that was ours. The Thad trade was just so pathetic and perfectly describes the horrible 4 years from 2021 to now lol.

I was joking
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?

Please advise….

Dan G.
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 13,048
And1: 10,020
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1813 » by PushDaRock » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:15 pm

ConSarnit wrote:
TerryTate wrote:It's quite obvious MU is dangling RJ IQ #9 and he's going to see what can he can get / fit.
To be honest, I would be even dangling Scotty (Secretly) out to see what we could possibly get as well.

Personally, I think people here are undervaluing RJ.
Once of the biggest things that I feel we would be losing out on is the driving/cutting that RJ does very well. This is what creates motion in an offense. I don't wanna be a heavy ISO team like NYK, that just killed clock with Brunson dribbling. I'm sure both people watched the finals. Both teams were pushing the ball, driving the hoop, cutting baselines and it created a lot of open looks for their teammates. Additionally, RJ's corner 3pt % has gone was at 40% this year.


RJ’s cut frequency is around 5%. That’s 1 cut per game. His ppp was 32nd percentile. Raptors players who cut more than RJ:

Poeltl
Mogbo
Boucher
Agbaji
Dick
Battle
Walter

RJ is not a good cutter.


Like we have discussed previously, he is an excellent guy to have attacking closeouts and coming off screens, catching and getting to the basket. It's not traditional cutting but it's still an off ball action that is effective out there.
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,602
And1: 3,541
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1814 » by Raptors Realtor » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:16 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:Trading the best player + the best pick to move down and pick up role players would be insane.


And the player is also 5 years younger loll


Also Cam is super injury prone, always misses significant time.
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 25,329
And1: 26,496
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1815 » by tdotrep2 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:19 pm

djsunyc wrote:
Jerry Lucas wrote:
Read on Twitter


i think this is some sort of aggragated nonsense and not real reporting BUT rj + 9 for claxton + 19 work in the trade checker.

other possibility is cam johnson.

I highly doubt its claxton.. you could argue rj by himself has more value. It would be cam, 19 and maybe another asset...
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 25,329
And1: 26,496
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1816 » by tdotrep2 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:22 pm

Duffman100 wrote:Can we get Claxton, Johnson and the 19th? lol

no way its just claxton...
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 13,048
And1: 10,020
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1817 » by PushDaRock » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:22 pm

Lord_Zedd wrote:I dont think we were sold on the idea of tanking, only to end up with a mediocre pick and some role players that aren't much better than what we have.

Cam Johnson would be nice. Unless we're reviving project 6'9, are we playing Cam at the SG? And Claxton isn't that big of an upgrade over Poeltl


lol how is Claxton even an upgrade over Jak? He was awful last year putting up a 57 TS% with a -12.7 in on court per 100 and -9.8 in on/off per 100. He's interesting if he can get back to his year 4 performance but it seems unlikely.

Obviously Cam's 3 point shooting is interesting but he's an average defender and I would really be concerned about rim pressure on this team. We wouldn't have a single guy that gets to the rim well. Ingram in the past has been able to do it but his FTR plummeted last season and seems unlikely with all the injuries that he will be getting there as much as he has in the past going forward.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 99,688
And1: 73,488
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1818 » by djsunyc » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:24 pm

would you do this:

rj + 9 for onyeka + niang + 13 + 22.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,404
And1: 23,651
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1819 » by ATLTimekeeper » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:27 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
Lord_Zedd wrote:I dont think we were sold on the idea of tanking, only to end up with a mediocre pick and some role players that aren't much better than what we have.

Cam Johnson would be nice. Unless we're reviving project 6'9, are we playing Cam at the SG? And Claxton isn't that big of an upgrade over Poeltl


lol how is Claxton even an upgrade over Jak? He was awful last year putting up a 57 TS% with a -12.7 in on court per 100 and -9.8 in on/off per 100. He's interesting if he can get back to his year 4 performance but it seems unlikely.

Obviously Cam's 3 point shooting is interesting but he's an average defender and I would really be concerned about rim pressure on this team. We wouldn't have a single guy that gets to the rim well. Ingram in the past has been able to do it but his FTR plummeted last season and seems unlikely with all the injuries that he will be getting there as much as he has in the past going forward.


Claxton can't play with Poeltl. Cam blocks Gradey and maybe Walter. I think RJ for Cam and #19 makes some sense if they feel like RJ coming back is too much of a risk of peeling off all-star votes from Scottie. That shouldn't also cost the #9 pick.
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 25,329
And1: 26,496
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: Stein/Fischer: Toronto willing to deal RJ Barrett, IQ, Poeltl for Significant Upgrades // #9 Available 

Post#1820 » by tdotrep2 » Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:34 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Lord_Zedd wrote:I dont think we were sold on the idea of tanking, only to end up with a mediocre pick and some role players that aren't much better than what we have.

Cam Johnson would be nice. Unless we're reviving project 6'9, are we playing Cam at the SG? And Claxton isn't that big of an upgrade over Poeltl


lol how is Claxton even an upgrade over Jak? He was awful last year putting up a 57 TS% with a -12.7 in on court per 100 and -9.8 in on/off per 100. He's interesting if he can get back to his year 4 performance but it seems unlikely.

Obviously Cam's 3 point shooting is interesting but he's an average defender and I would really be concerned about rim pressure on this team. We wouldn't have a single guy that gets to the rim well. Ingram in the past has been able to do it but his FTR plummeted last season and seems unlikely with all the injuries that he will be getting there as much as he has in the past going forward.


Claxton can't play with Poeltl. Cam blocks Gradey and maybe Walter. I think RJ for Cam and #19 makes some sense if they feel like RJ coming back is too much of a risk of peeling off all-star votes from Scottie. That shouldn't also cost the #9 pick.


Image

Return to Toronto Raptors