ImageImage

Round 1 - Matthew Golden

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,406
And1: 9,776
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#121 » by M-C-G » Wed Apr 30, 2025 12:23 am

crkone wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:
BUCKnation wrote:His tape is basically anti-Ewers tape


This is what stood out to me. Ewers really was one of the most overhyped college QB's I can remember.


Golden's highlights at Houston are so much better. They really show off his speed.


There was a nice 50 yard play against ASU when he was at Texas, a 4.29 guy takes that to the house given the angle. Very possible he wasn’t 100% but also 100% possible i didn’t watch his Houston stuff that might have shown more speed.

I like the player a lot though. He is some weird cross between DJ Moore and Greg Jennings which is weird because they are such different players, but he oscillates between the two on every other play to me. I think he could be a stud for the record in this offense.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,039
And1: 4,077
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#122 » by MVP2110 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:18 am

Before the draft, a ton of Packers fans wanted a guy who dominated in college and wasn't a traits based pick. So I'm surprised how many on here like this pick. He has some of the lowest production levels for a 1st round WR in awhile. His 61 yards per game are the 2nd lowest in a decade, ahead of only Jalen Reagor. He was picked because of what he flashed and what he could be

I like the pick, I believe in what Golden can be. I'm just surprised so many of you do
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,729
And1: 6,916
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#123 » by LUKE23 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 4:14 pm

MVP2110 wrote:Before the draft, a ton of Packers fans wanted a guy who dominated in college and wasn't a traits based pick. So I'm surprised how many on here like this pick. He has some of the lowest production levels for a 1st round WR in awhile. His 61 yards per game are the 2nd lowest in a decade, ahead of only Jalen Reagor. He was picked because of what he flashed and what he could be

I like the pick, I believe in what Golden can be. I'm just surprised so many of you do


I thnk context around the offense always matters, as there so many apples to oranges comparisons when looking at college offenses. He cam from an air raid system to a system that threw a ton to TE/RB, and he had a bad deep ball throwing QB. I compare it to Jayden Reed. Reed averaged 58 yards per game a year older than Golden at MSU. Why? Because his QB wasn't that great nor was the offensive scheme.

To me, it's the fact that Golden is young (21), and was clearly developing as the year went on, dominating at the end of the year against the best opponents. That, along with his physical traits.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,039
And1: 4,077
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#124 » by MVP2110 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 4:38 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:Before the draft, a ton of Packers fans wanted a guy who dominated in college and wasn't a traits based pick. So I'm surprised how many on here like this pick. He has some of the lowest production levels for a 1st round WR in awhile. His 61 yards per game are the 2nd lowest in a decade, ahead of only Jalen Reagor. He was picked because of what he flashed and what he could be

I like the pick, I believe in what Golden can be. I'm just surprised so many of you do


I thnk context around the offense always matters, as there so many apples to oranges comparisons when looking at college offenses. He cam from an air raid system to a system that threw a ton to TE/RB, and he had a bad deep ball throwing QB. I compare it to Jayden Reed. Reed averaged 58 yards per game a year older than Golden at MSU. Why? Because his QB wasn't that great nor was the offensive scheme.

To me, it's the fact that Golden is young (21), and was clearly developing as the year went on, dominating at the end of the year against the best opponents. That, along with his physical traits.


I absolutely understand the caveats, and I like the traits he showed quite a bit. I just find it interesting because this is very much a Gutey style pick of trusting the traits more than the actual production in college which a few weeks ago everyone seemed to hate
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,399
And1: 40,976
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#125 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Apr 30, 2025 5:57 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:Before the draft, a ton of Packers fans wanted a guy who dominated in college and wasn't a traits based pick. So I'm surprised how many on here like this pick. He has some of the lowest production levels for a 1st round WR in awhile. His 61 yards per game are the 2nd lowest in a decade, ahead of only Jalen Reagor. He was picked because of what he flashed and what he could be

I like the pick, I believe in what Golden can be. I'm just surprised so many of you do


I thnk context around the offense always matters, as there so many apples to oranges comparisons when looking at college offenses. He cam from an air raid system to a system that threw a ton to TE/RB, and he had a bad deep ball throwing QB. I compare it to Jayden Reed. Reed averaged 58 yards per game a year older than Golden at MSU. Why? Because his QB wasn't that great nor was the offensive scheme.

To me, it's the fact that Golden is young (21), and was clearly developing as the year went on, dominating at the end of the year against the best opponents. That, along with his physical traits.


I absolutely understand the caveats, and I like the traits he showed quite a bit. I just find it interesting because this is very much a Gutey style pick of trusting the traits more than the actual production in college which a few weeks ago everyone seemed to hate


He was my #3 WR and #18 overall player for the Packers. The only guys higher on the list that were available were

Will Johnson (knee)
Mike Green (SA accusations)
Jihaad Campbell (not a position of need)
Nick Emanworri (not a position of need)
Trey Amos (apparently not a position of need?)
Malachi Starks (not a position of need)

and Donovan Ezeiruaku, a guy I thought was a fit and a need. So one real option. I was good with Golden there.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,039
And1: 4,077
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#126 » by MVP2110 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:17 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
I thnk context around the offense always matters, as there so many apples to oranges comparisons when looking at college offenses. He cam from an air raid system to a system that threw a ton to TE/RB, and he had a bad deep ball throwing QB. I compare it to Jayden Reed. Reed averaged 58 yards per game a year older than Golden at MSU. Why? Because his QB wasn't that great nor was the offensive scheme.

To me, it's the fact that Golden is young (21), and was clearly developing as the year went on, dominating at the end of the year against the best opponents. That, along with his physical traits.


I absolutely understand the caveats, and I like the traits he showed quite a bit. I just find it interesting because this is very much a Gutey style pick of trusting the traits more than the actual production in college which a few weeks ago everyone seemed to hate


He was my #3 WR and #18 overall player for the Packers. The only guys higher on the list that were available were

Will Johnson (knee)
Mike Green (SA accusations)
Jihaad Campbell (not a position of need)
Nick Emanworri (not a position of need)
Trey Amos (apparently not a position of need?)
Malachi Starks (not a position of need)

and Donovan Ezeiruaku, a guy I thought was a fit and a need. So one real option. I was good with Golden there.


But weren't you the one who said a few weeks ago you were over traits based picks and wanted to pick someone who dominated in college? That certainly wasn't Golden
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,399
And1: 40,976
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#127 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:19 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
I absolutely understand the caveats, and I like the traits he showed quite a bit. I just find it interesting because this is very much a Gutey style pick of trusting the traits more than the actual production in college which a few weeks ago everyone seemed to hate


He was my #3 WR and #18 overall player for the Packers. The only guys higher on the list that were available were

Will Johnson (knee)
Mike Green (SA accusations)
Jihaad Campbell (not a position of need)
Nick Emanworri (not a position of need)
Trey Amos (apparently not a position of need?)
Malachi Starks (not a position of need)

and Donovan Ezeiruaku, a guy I thought was a fit and a need. So one real option. I was good with Golden there.


But weren't you the one who said a few weeks ago you were over traits based picks and wanted to pick someone who dominated in college? That certainly wasn't Golden


He did enough vs Georgia and Arizona State.
User avatar
JEIS
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,119
And1: 2,273
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#128 » by JEIS » Wed Apr 30, 2025 7:37 pm

Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,298
And1: 8,093
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#129 » by Profound23 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 8:23 pm

JEIS wrote:https://youtu.be/5w6bk3s35UA?si=1JkEWkEgjOBYkCnv

Pretty cool video.



If you don't watch the entire thing fast forward to 41:50

Crazy the mom talks to Barryn Sorrell and says "I'm gonna be looking for you tomorrow."

Nice to know Golden and Sorrell already have at least a semi-close relationship. Hopefully they both work out well for us.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,227
And1: 54,336
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#130 » by MickeyDavis » Fri May 2, 2025 8:13 pm

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,039
And1: 4,077
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#131 » by MVP2110 » Sat May 10, 2025 3:03 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=7muSGIQ64JUgCdh2FPpC8A&s=19
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 35,529
And1: 25,918
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#132 » by Matches Malone » Sat May 10, 2025 6:12 pm

Hopefully nobody was silly enough to get a #22 jersey right away. Figured he'd end up with #2 eventually. Malik needs to figure out a new number. Just give him 16 and cut Clifford lol.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,039
And1: 4,077
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#133 » by MVP2110 » Sat May 10, 2025 6:49 pm

Matches Malone wrote:Hopefully nobody was silly enough to get a #22 jersey right away. Figured he'd end up with #2 eventually. Malik needs to figure out a new number. Just give him 16 and cut Clifford lol.


Saw a few people walking around on day 2 of the Draft with #81 Golden jerseys that I'm assuming that got made custom
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 35,529
And1: 25,918
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#134 » by Matches Malone » Mon May 19, 2025 8:55 pm

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,406
And1: 9,776
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#135 » by M-C-G » Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:14 pm

I’m not trying to get too excited about this dude, but man, I think we may have found something special. All the stuff I watch, I just love how he moves and hope he is spending a lot of time with Love
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 35,529
And1: 25,918
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Round 1 - Matthew Golden 

Post#136 » by Matches Malone » Wed Jul 2, 2025 2:31 am

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?

Return to Green Bay Packers