MVP2110 wrote:LUKE23 wrote:MVP2110 wrote:Before the draft, a ton of Packers fans wanted a guy who dominated in college and wasn't a traits based pick. So I'm surprised how many on here like this pick. He has some of the lowest production levels for a 1st round WR in awhile. His 61 yards per game are the 2nd lowest in a decade, ahead of only Jalen Reagor. He was picked because of what he flashed and what he could be
I like the pick, I believe in what Golden can be. I'm just surprised so many of you do
I thnk context around the offense always matters, as there so many apples to oranges comparisons when looking at college offenses. He cam from an air raid system to a system that threw a ton to TE/RB, and he had a bad deep ball throwing QB. I compare it to Jayden Reed. Reed averaged 58 yards per game a year older than Golden at MSU. Why? Because his QB wasn't that great nor was the offensive scheme.
To me, it's the fact that Golden is young (21), and was clearly developing as the year went on, dominating at the end of the year against the best opponents. That, along with his physical traits.
I absolutely understand the caveats, and I like the traits he showed quite a bit. I just find it interesting because this is very much a Gutey style pick of trusting the traits more than the actual production in college which a few weeks ago everyone seemed to hate
He was my #3 WR and #18 overall player for the Packers. The only guys higher on the list that were available were
Will Johnson (knee)
Mike Green (SA accusations)
Jihaad Campbell (not a position of need)
Nick Emanworri (not a position of need)
Trey Amos (apparently not a position of need?)
Malachi Starks (not a position of need)
and Donovan Ezeiruaku, a guy I thought was a fit and a need. So one real option. I was good with Golden there.