165bows wrote:Hauser/Niang/Tillman for Jarret Allen according to random realm poster
That would be sick. But we all know that’s never happening lol
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
165bows wrote:Hauser/Niang/Tillman for Jarret Allen according to random realm poster
The Corey's wrote:chrisab123 wrote:The Corey's wrote:
We're over the cap and we have nothing left to trade for.
They're done.
You’re under the second apron and chance Tatum comes back in March. What are you talking about?
There it is. Misplaced optimism.
Even if Tatum came back next march and was a better version of the player who got hurt, this team ain't going to the finals.
You see the roster they have?
Gant wrote:Bobby Krivitsky
The Hawks will receive a 2026 least favorable second-round pick from the Celtics, per
@mikeascotto.bsky.social
The draft pick going to the Celtics is a 2031 Cleveland second-rounder, per @jakelfischer.bsky.social
jmr07019 wrote:The Corey's wrote:chrisab123 wrote:
You’re under the second apron and chance Tatum comes back in March. What are you talking about?
There it is. Misplaced optimism.
Even if Tatum came back next march and was a better version of the player who got hurt, this team ain't going to the finals.
You see the roster they have?
We have the top 3 from a title team. Decent place to start. (Yes I know there are injury concerns). I of course don’t see us as a finals team but I do think Brad will do something at the big man spot and we’ll be in the 7-10 range, if things go well we’ll be 4-6.
The general consensus all year was it was going to cost assets to dump salary and instead we gained assets. I’m happy about that.
Scarletfire81 wrote:165bows wrote:Hauser/Niang/Tillman for Jarret Allen according to random realm poster
That would be sick. But we all know that’s never happening lol
Scarletfire81 wrote:I keep wondering what the new owners think of all this. Are they panicking? Lol
Bill Lumbergh wrote:Well, if we still have 28 tomorrow night, I hope we take Kalkbrenner.
Scarletfire81 wrote:I keep wondering what the new owners think of all this. Are they panicking? Lol
playa-hater wrote:Bill Lumbergh wrote:Well, if we still have 28 tomorrow night, I hope we take Kalkbrenner.
As of this moment.. And also 32.. But with the way things are going, nothing will be guaranteed.
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Well balance has been restored to this website, via brad Stevens, at the very least lol. We're back!
chrisab123 wrote:The Corey's wrote:chrisab123 wrote:
You’re under the second apron and chance Tatum comes back in March. What are you talking about?
There it is. Misplaced optimism.
Even if Tatum came back next march and was a better version of the player who got hurt, this team ain't going to the finals.
You see the roster they have?
Yeah if healthy with Tatum, it’s almost the same one that went to the ECF before minus Marcus. Unless you still think Marcus is a star (he’s not) what’s your point?
Curmudgeon wrote:The Porzingis trade makes perfect sense to me. The Holiday trade does not.
WeLikeOurGuys wrote:People keep saying this gives the Celtics trade flexibility, but let’s be real — if Brown, Tatum, and White are untouchable, then what flexibility are we actually talking about? That leaves you with Simons, Payton Pritchard, and Sam Hauser. What are you realistically getting in a trade with those pieces?
fallguy wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:chrisab123 wrote:
You’re under the second apron and chance Tatum comes back in March. What are you talking about?
So what?
That roster is straight mediocre **** now
Again, it's June 24.