DuckIII wrote:sco wrote:I don't hate the JK idea, but unless he sucks, it would spell the end of either Coby or Giddey, but if he's good enough to unseat one of them, I guess it is fine.
Not really. He's a three position player. Plenty of room at PG, SG and SF for KJ to get lots of minutes along with everyone else. Among guards and wings he's arguably the least likely to create logjams.
But lets also assume it is true. It doesn't matter. He's more talented than Coby and we'd still have Ayo. So trade Coby for more assets while also getting the better player.
As sco said, if he's that good and we have a problem, 1st world problems. OKC had that "problem" in that they had 3 playmakers that needed the ball, they were able to trade one of them for Alex Caruso who normally have gone for multiple 1st round picks (if AK had traded him a few months earlier).
'
This is why you draft BPA, redundant talent is still an asset while a rookie who positionally fits but is worthless isn't an asset and at worst could be a drain financially (patrick's 5 year contract). Of course, KC said AK is 100% drafting for fit
