ImageImageImageImageImage

NBA Draft Discussion Part 10

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,195
And1: 23,523
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#581 » by ATLTimekeeper » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:21 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:
WuTang_OG wrote:
Read on Twitter


Masai calling the shots for Mogbo and Shead


Who is the dude with the glasses who called in Mogbo? He looked like he lost the argument :lol:
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 40,959
And1: 51,411
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#582 » by WuTang_CMB » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:21 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
junot111
General Manager
Posts: 9,437
And1: 3,320
Joined: Jan 31, 2007

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#583 » by junot111 » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:22 pm

I would take that d. white deal in a heartbeat
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,777
And1: 46,519
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#584 » by PhilBlackson » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:22 pm

niQ wrote:
RapsFanInOhio wrote:
WiggOuts wrote:i dont get why so many scouts have BKN taking Maluach, they have more pressing needs and they already have Claxton

Was just about to post something like this. If New Orleans passes on him, I think we take him at 9. They're going guard or wing I think.


I think the rumours are that they'll trade Claxton. But I agree, I think their top priority should be a point guard.


I don't think any particular position should be a "priority" per say.

I get that in all likelihood the true BPA would likely be a PG ie/ Fears or Jak buuut their existing players should play little to no effect on their drafting decisions. Because it's highly unlikely ANY of those guys will still be around in a couple of years or so.

So imo it's BPA (period).

ie/ if Tre Johnson happened to be the player that drops, they should take him - doesn't matter if they could use a PG. Right now they just need to load up on the best talent available and start prioritizing different positions in a few years from now once they see who sticks and who doesn't. But again if BPA is a PG then yes they should take that player but there just not in a position where they should be factoring roster "need" into the equation imo.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON*
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 35,968
And1: 68,197
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#585 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:22 pm

S.W.A.N wrote:
WiggOuts wrote:i dont get why so many scouts have BKN taking Maluach, they have more pressing needs and they already have Claxton


Nets don't have pressing needs. They are going to be running the tank back.

BPA


The Nets have needs everywhere and they won't let an average player like Claxton get in the way of taking BPA
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 35,968
And1: 68,197
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#586 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:27 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:BRK should just spam the draft with their 5 firsts

take swings

they need to build a foundation


#8 - Maluach
#19 - Traore
#22 - Fleming
#26 - Richardson
#27 - McNeeley


They can draft an entire bench unit.

C Maluach
F Fleming
F McNeely
G Richardson
G Traore
Mr.Raptorsingh
RealGM
Posts: 34,960
And1: 28,588
Joined: May 17, 2007
 

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#587 » by Mr.Raptorsingh » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:28 pm

Quickley
White
Ingram
Barnes
Poeltl

It's decent, but they are relying a lot on Ingram imo, dude has not topped 5.3 WS in his career, his best is .120 WS/48, and Scottish Barnes has been trending downward since his rookie season.

And Quickley was a complete non-factor last season in his first season as a starting PG, he's also an unknown at that position.
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 40,959
And1: 51,411
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#588 » by WuTang_CMB » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:31 pm

Image
User avatar
niQ
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 15,996
And1: 29,838
Joined: Jun 14, 2011

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#589 » by niQ » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:32 pm

Super small sample but Nets board like Essengue for his potential: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2462888
Mr.Raptorsingh
RealGM
Posts: 34,960
And1: 28,588
Joined: May 17, 2007
 

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#590 » by Mr.Raptorsingh » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:33 pm

niQ wrote:Super small sample but Nets board like Essengue for his potential: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2462888


Good, hope they take him at 8.
User avatar
artsncrafts
RealGM
Posts: 22,355
And1: 26,034
Joined: Feb 04, 2013
Location: Shambleland, Ont.
 

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#591 » by artsncrafts » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:35 pm

Essengue seems like a Bruno type reach. At 20 its okay. I assume Masai does his due diligence though as a lot more is riding at #9 than #20.
Harold_and_Kumar wrote:What if the 10 incher was overrated and the 4 incher was too small for any playing time, but the 7 incher was a perfect fit for our roster and the 5 incher was good for specific situations, like backdoor cuts?
User avatar
dhackett1565
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,883
And1: 2,152
Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Location: Pessimist central, wondering how I got here, unable to find my way out.

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#592 » by dhackett1565 » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:35 pm

I'd be very happy with one of Maluach, Essengue or Carter, at least two of which should be on the board at 9, or someone majorly slips.
Alfred re: Coach Mitchell - "My doctor botched my surgury and sewed my hand to my head, but I can't really comment on that, because I'm not a doctor, and thus he is above my criticism."
Woodman19
Ballboy
Posts: 34
And1: 38
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#593 » by Woodman19 » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:36 pm

I'm all in on Essengue, this is the swing for the fences player who might turn out being one of the best players when it's all said and done, provided you trust our ability to develop the scoring and defensive game. The raw athleticism, size and work ethic are there
SpezNc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 938
Joined: May 28, 2023
Contact:
   

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#594 » by SpezNc » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:39 pm

TimeForChange wrote:
Kreamy wrote:
djsunyc wrote:
celtics also gave up a swap in 2028 to the spurs.

white is not a bad contract - they would still have to take back rj so we be "dumping" that deal onto them.

there's is no one missing piece. it's just another move in a series of moves. we won't be hamstrung in making other deals over the next year or two either.

the question to ask is in the 27/28 season, would you rather be paying $30+ mil to rj or white.


RJ has 2 years left on his deal and makes $27M/year. He put up an efficient 21/6/5 last season and is 6 years younger than White. I'm not even sure I'd trade him straight up for White when you factor the age, let alone use the 9th pick to "dump" him. The Barrett hate here has gotten irrational. If we're trading him with assets and picks, I'm expecting a big return. He's not Paul George where we need to use a pick to dump his contract.

Not trading RJ for White? :lol:


It’s more the fact we probably would have to surrender pick #9 and maybe even more .

It’s probably RJ , Pick #9 + another asset like Agbaji for Derick White.

White should be the ultimate championship final piece. We aren’t there yet !

While it’s exciting and fun to be in all the rumours, I don’t understand the urgency to compete now at all cost. I guess Edward Rogers is putting max pressure to Bobby/Masai .

It’s also possible it’s just noise ! I hope it’s just noise !
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,548
And1: 17,859
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#595 » by Basketball_Jones » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:40 pm

I think it’s telling we haven’t heard Carter Bryant workout for anybody. He’s a guy that has very little data to go off of and is mainly built on reputation. They likely felt his stock might take a hit. I’d be cool with him because at least he can shoot and defend, that’s proven. But wouldn’t have high hopes for much else.
2019 Eastern Conference All Stars

Derozan
Lowry
Ibaka
Valanciunas
Van Vleet
Delon Wright
Lebron
Embiid

There are only 2 teams in the league that rank in the top 6 in offensive and defensive efficiency: the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,406
And1: 25,592
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#596 » by ItsDanger » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:40 pm

Tanking all season to end up taking Essengue would be a major letdown.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,310
And1: 14,334
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#597 » by dagger » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:42 pm

artsncrafts wrote:Essengue seems like a Bruno type reach. At 20 its okay. I assume Masai does his due diligence though as a lot more is riding at #9 than #20.


Give me a break, Bruno was hardly getting minutes in a second tier Brazilian league. Essengue is getting minutes against Eu roCup and Euroleague teams. Maybe we can do better at #9 than Essengue, but there is absolutely no using Bruno as a comp for him.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
nowayguy
Senior
Posts: 724
And1: 775
Joined: Apr 10, 2011

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#598 » by nowayguy » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:43 pm

artsncrafts wrote:Essengue seems like a Bruno type reach. At 20 its okay. I assume Masai does his due diligence though as a lot more is riding at #9 than #20.

Givony's latest rankings, which takes into account opinions from scouts and front offices, has Essengue at 9. I think it's fairly safe to say NBA teams wouldn't view it as a reach.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,195
And1: 23,523
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#599 » by ATLTimekeeper » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:43 pm

Basketball_Jones wrote:I think it’s telling we haven’t heard Carter Bryant workout for anybody. He’s a guy that has very little data to go off of and is mainly built on reputation. They likely felt his stock might take a hit. I’d be cool with him because at least he can shoot and defend, that’s proven. But wouldn’t have high hopes for much else.


He worked out for the Bulls, probably got a promise and shut it down. This is one of the worst run teams in the league and they would very much do this.
MavCarter
RealGM
Posts: 17,773
And1: 31,374
Joined: Mar 07, 2016
Location: Toronto
     

Re: NBA Draft Discussion Part 10 

Post#600 » by MavCarter » Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:43 pm

artsncrafts wrote:Essengue seems like a Bruno type reach. At 20 its okay. I assume Masai does his due diligence though as a lot more is riding at #9 than #20.


Essengue is a contributor on a pro team filled with grown men at 18. Bruno barely knew how to play basketball when we drafted him at 18. I dont understand how people are down on essengue for being a project but at the same time want carter bryant who's going to be 20 going into the season and avg'd 6/4/1 in college. He's also a project hes just 2 years older
#Enjoytheride

Return to Toronto Raptors