Celts17Pride wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Hugo's ranks 26th on Givony's big board. Of course, some expect Brad to draft a top 10 talent at 28.
Why not?
It's not clear they didn't get a huge talent.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Celts17Pride wrote:CelticFaninLBC wrote:Hugo's ranks 26th on Givony's big board. Of course, some expect Brad to draft a top 10 talent at 28.
Why not?
playa-hater wrote:If we weren't going to take a big, I would have much preferred Penda..
bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The red flag on Fleming must be the size of Mount Everest...
playa-hater wrote:fallguy wrote:SuperDeluxe wrote:Haven't multiple sources just said the Celtics are bringing the guy over now?
Yes but that fact gets in the way of the rampant negativity.
You say facts and negativity, so what is 24%? Sounds like a facts and negativity to me.
Hal14 wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The red flag on Fleming must be the size of Mount Everest...
He's ranked 32 on Sam Vecenie's board, from The Athletic.
https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/06/18185319/2025-NBA-Draft-Guide-Intl-Updates.pdf
Vecenie on his podcast said that some teams like him but others see him as nothing more than a 2-way contract player.
Vecenie also said on his pod that Fleming "has no idea where he is going on defense".

playa-hater wrote:djFan71 wrote:playa-hater wrote:If we weren't going to take a big, I would have much preferred Penda..
I'm with you here. Penda/Fleming was kinda my hope. But, I'm still good with Hugo as long as we get one of those 2 tomorrow.
Even if you put him above jordan walsh, he's technically our fifth wing behind brown white hauser and rico. All while not even having a decent, powerful forward or center.. I'm sorry but that is just horrible..
He plays hard, but is more than a hustler and strong defender. He’s a high-motor wing with great defensive tools and a slashing style on offense.
fallguy wrote:playa-hater wrote:fallguy wrote:
Yes but that fact gets in the way of the rampant negativity.
You say facts and negativity, so what is 24%? Sounds like a facts and negativity to me.
I have no idea what this post is supposed to mean.

Hal14 wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Can you imagine Hugo and Walsh on the court at the same time?
Clang... Clunk... Clang... Clunk... Clang... Clunk.
Shooting is the easiest, most common thing that players improve in the NBA.
JB wasn't a good shooter in college..neither was Grant. White and Al didn't really shoot it before getting here..
Also, Hugo being drafted might signal Walsh is about to get traded..or he'll get waived before the season since only $200K of his contract for this season is guaranteed.
Perhaps we'll have them both on summer league team and if Walsh isn't lighting it up there, he'll get cut..
playa-hater wrote:aim2please wrote:Celtics are excellent at making trades under Brad, mediocre at best at drafting. Flemming at 28 and one of the bigs (Kalkbrenner) at 32 was such an obvious draft.
Maybe Hugo was the only guy that agreed not to come over so Celtics can save some more $ for the new owners. I hope that's not the case.
Hugo was such a disappointment for Madrid this year, hypothetical player that's not good/great at anything. Basically, Abrines 2.0.
What's you just described is what I just saw on video. Doesn't look apparently good at anything. Meanwhile, facts are facts, he shot 27% for 3 years. That is not a small sample size.
playa-hater wrote:djFan71 wrote:playa-hater wrote:If we weren't going to take a big, I would have much preferred Penda..
I'm with you here. Penda/Fleming was kinda my hope. But, I'm still good with Hugo as long as we get one of those 2 tomorrow.
Even if you put him above jordan walsh, he's technically our fifth wing behind brown white hauser and rico. All while not even having a decent, powerful forward or center.. I'm sorry but that is just horrible..
playa-hater wrote:fallguy wrote:playa-hater wrote:
You say facts and negativity, so what is 24%? Sounds like a facts and negativity to me.
I have no idea what this post is supposed to mean.
That he is a wing and shot twenty four percent from three last season and twenty seven percent in the last three years.
playa-hater wrote:aim2please wrote:Celtics are excellent at making trades under Brad, mediocre at best at drafting. Flemming at 28 and one of the bigs (Kalkbrenner) at 32 was such an obvious draft.
Maybe Hugo was the only guy that agreed not to come over so Celtics can save some more $ for the new owners. I hope that's not the case.
Hugo was such a disappointment for Madrid this year, hypothetical player that's not good/great at anything. Basically, Abrines 2.0.
What's you just described is what I just saw on video. Doesn't look apparently good at anything. Meanwhile, facts are facts, he shot 27% for 3 years. That is not a small sample size.
fallguy wrote:Hal14 wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The red flag on Fleming must be the size of Mount Everest...
He's ranked 32 on Sam Vecenie's board, from The Athletic.
https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/06/18185319/2025-NBA-Draft-Guide-Intl-Updates.pdf
Vecenie on his podcast said that some teams like him but others see him as nothing more than a 2-way contract player.
Vecenie also said on his pod that Fleming "has no idea where he is going on defense".
But it's apparently a fireable offense that Brad didn't take him?


playa-hater wrote:fallguy wrote:SuperDeluxe wrote:Haven't multiple sources just said the Celtics are bringing the guy over now?
Yes but that fact gets in the way of the rampant negativity.
You say facts and negativity, so what is 24%? Sounds like a facts and negativity to me.
fallguy wrote:Hal14 wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The red flag on Fleming must be the size of Mount Everest...
He's ranked 32 on Sam Vecenie's board, from The Athletic.
https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/06/18185319/2025-NBA-Draft-Guide-Intl-Updates.pdf
Vecenie on his podcast said that some teams like him but others see him as nothing more than a 2-way contract player.
Vecenie also said on his pod that Fleming "has no idea where he is going on defense".
But it's apparently a fireable offense that Brad didn't take him?
VeryMuchWoke wrote:playa-hater wrote:aim2please wrote:Celtics are excellent at making trades under Brad, mediocre at best at drafting. Flemming at 28 and one of the bigs (Kalkbrenner) at 32 was such an obvious draft.
Maybe Hugo was the only guy that agreed not to come over so Celtics can save some more $ for the new owners. I hope that's not the case.
Hugo was such a disappointment for Madrid this year, hypothetical player that's not good/great at anything. Basically, Abrines 2.0.
What's you just described is what I just saw on video. Doesn't look apparently good at anything. Meanwhile, facts are facts, he shot 27% for 3 years. That is not a small sample size.
When we got White he wasn't a 3 point shooter and Brad said he'd become one. Brad has a pretty good track record with projecting shooting.

GrandTheftRondo wrote:return2glory wrote:playa-hater wrote:
And who is he exactly going to be playing over.. That's a joke
Cooper Flagg would be playing for Maine Celtics if we drafted him, with Joe as coach.
Oh please.
Stop being ridiculous.
We’ve had zero good rookies worth playing on a contender in Joe’s time there.
Joe is no different to any other contending coach. You don’t get any burn as a rookie unless you’re exceptional.
playa-hater wrote:fallguy wrote:Hal14 wrote:
He's ranked 32 on Sam Vecenie's board, from The Athletic.
https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/06/18185319/2025-NBA-Draft-Guide-Intl-Updates.pdf
Vecenie on his podcast said that some teams like him but others see him as nothing more than a 2-way contract player.
Vecenie also said on his pod that Fleming "has no idea where he is going on defense".
But it's apparently a fireable offense that Brad didn't take him?
Why are you being dramatic? No one is calling for Brad to get fired.. My God, if somebody disagrees with a professional. It's like everyone's an idiot. And yet a few years later, these professionals get proven wrong all the time.
Meanwhile, quite a few of us hated that danny traded desmond Bane for nothing.. Danny Ange knows more than us. Of course, and yet the player he just gave away was just traded for 4 first round picks and a swap.
