Very pleased, but also very tired so will read and write a lot more tomorrow. Quick hitters:
1. He was my second favorite option going into draft night, but as KJ and Noa kept both being available by the time we got to the tenth pick, I told my son I was starting to prefer Noa. Then I went back to KJ right before we picked.

Point being, I wanted him badly for quite awhile now after I had time to drill down into the video of the 10-12 guys I focused on as being in our range.
2. When we picked Matas I made a big deal out of the fact that, in a way, it was damning evidence of AK's incompetence as a GM that we had gone literally years and years as what must have been the only team in the NBA that had zero players with that general profile. Well AK did take Matas and now he took another one. That's progress.
3. It matters to me what this potentially represents as an organizational shift. He's the second youngest player in the draft. He's not ready to contribute to winning at a meaningful level next year, and he's a big uspside swing. It is, I hope, a strong sign that our FO is finally starting to understand what is and what is not important.
4. It also matters that it furthers a rational team identity rooted in the complimentary strengths of personnel who also have the same unifying characteristics to play a particular way. Its logical.
5. Its also fun.
Love the pick. Thumbs up. Now lets hope it works. And give it about 3 years before deciding if it did.