younggunsmn wrote:
This is a ridiculous excuse Minott Miller and Garza can and probably should all be let go. 
According to you.  I agree with you on Garza, but those are our evaluations and we don't have near the info that Conelly has.  He's trying to balance next year and the future.  Even if I don't like the long term future of any of them as much as someone at 31, it's hard to say that 31 would have helped next year more than any of the guys that have been in the league for 2+ years.  Development isn't linear.  I don't think it's impossible that Minott or Miller could still find something.
TC is basically saying they valued Minott and Garza over a pick at 31, which is insane to me.  Its just giving a lot of cover to being cheap.
It's not being cheap.  31 would have had a lower salary next year than the options on any of our current guys.  Connelly thought it was better to have the current guy for MORE money next year.
But whatever.  I'm happy with Zikarsky now.  Just develop him he's got maybe 2nd best length in the league to Wemby and good tools.  
If they cut him in a year or two for another Daishen Nix I'm gone be pissed.
Without the trades back, we weren't going to get Rocco on a 2 way.  So, the question becomes is it better to have Garza, two future 2nds, and Rocco on a 2 way (fairly valuable contract) vs. Fleming?  I might disagree with Connelly there, but it's not some clear cut awful decision IMO.  It's certainly possible that Rocco could contribute more in the future than 31.  We'll also have to wait to see who we get with or use those future 2nds.