An hour ago, I was pissed off at the idea of too many swing men and diminishing returns I expected to ensue from decreased minutes of playing opportunity.WallToWall wrote:Ok…
I am going to admit that, beyond our first pick, I don’t understand how the rest of our picks help in a rebuild. I assume that Dawkins went for BPA with the last 2 picks as opposed to BPA at positions of need (correct me if this is wrong). Doesn’t this strategy slow down the rebuild process because we still have positions of need to fill, as we have to spend time to evaluate the play of a crowded position (wing guard)? Or is Dawkins signaling that we are fine with the C, PF, and SF positions because we have who we need (I don’t understand that)?
Can someone who has an understanding of the strategy being followed explain it to me?
Now I think the guys who do not win playing time battles still will have trade value from having notoriety. Trade some swings for some bigs, eventually. Trade for a big body Brunaon type, eventually.
Perhaps that is a strategy for after this LAST tank year.