Moderators: KingDavid, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ
CrossOver wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
Who is the long term money we are sending out?
Wiggins has a player option next year.
MiamiLoyal926 wrote:CrossOver wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:
Who is the long term money we are sending out?
Wiggins has a player option next year.
Which is why I wonder who they meant by long term money? It’s either 1 or 2 seasons for Wiggins. Who else are they trying to trade here that has long term money?
fincane30 wrote:Vertical Limit wrote:fincane30 wrote:
You're a cheap date. You're taking on two backups on expirings and trading away your starting two guard. So your offense gets worse for two guys who shouldn't start for the team if the Heat hit on Ware and Kasparas and you only get two firsts in return? And you're getting older for no reason. Raise your standards no matter how much you don't like Herro's game and potential extension.
Yes, I am moving on and selling high while we still can from the overrated guard that only some miami fans care about and aiming bigger by accumulating draft picks that i can later package for a star player.
Brian Hartline was a top receiver in the league according to dolphins fans. Tannehill, Chad Henne are both franchise qb’s. Hell some of yall say Tua is a franchise qb
you kids and your white knights…
You can't attract stars if the team is bad no matter how many assets you have. Star players don't join teams that they have to save. If you don't have good players on your team you're not getting any stars. And with stars not named Dame having near total control of their potential destination this hypothetical star that you're drooling over isn't gonna see Miami devoid of any running mates and say "trade me there". So trading Herro for expirings and picks does nothing.
If you want an OG, Trey Murphy. Dejounte Murray level player you can trade Herro for expirings and picks. You can pry a player like that from a team with the assets you get back in a Herro trade. Those players can't control their destinations. If your goal is to acquire the best player on a title team you better provide teammates that they think they can make a run with.
SA37 wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
Why is a part-owner of the Utah Jazz talkin' 'bout "we"?
Flash4thewin wrote:fincane30 wrote:Vertical Limit wrote:Yes, I am moving on and selling high while we still can from the overrated guard that only some miami fans care about and aiming bigger by accumulating draft picks that i can later package for a star player.
Brian Hartline was a top receiver in the league according to dolphins fans. Tannehill, Chad Henne are both franchise qb’s. Hell some of yall say Tua is a franchise qb
You can't attract stars if the team is bad no matter how many assets you have. Star players don't join teams that they have to save. If you don't have good players on your team you're not getting any stars. And with stars not named Dame having near total control of their potential destination this hypothetical star that you're drooling over isn't gonna see Miami devoid of any running mates and say "trade me there". So trading Herro for expirings and picks does nothing.
If you want an OG, Trey Murphy. Dejounte Murray level player you can trade Herro for expirings and picks. You can pry a player like that from a team with the assets you get back in a Herro trade. Those players can't control their destinations. If your goal is to acquire the best player on a title team you better provide teammates that they think they can make a run with.
LeBron and the Lakers say hi, technically you can even make the argument about LeBron and the Cavs second stint.
and not planned from the second LeBron decided LA was his destination. If the plan is to operate like you're the Lakers that's no plan at all. The Cavs in Lebron's second stint had Kyrie already cooking and a plan to trade Wiggins for Love. 
MiamiLoyal926 wrote:CrossOver wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:
Who is the long term money we are sending out?
Wiggins has a player option next year.
Which is why I wonder who they meant by long term money? It’s either 1 or 2 seasons for Wiggins. Who else are they trying to trade here that has long term money?
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:CrossOver wrote:
Wiggins has a player option next year.
Which is why I wonder who they meant by long term money? It’s either 1 or 2 seasons for Wiggins. Who else are they trying to trade here that has long term money?
That’s an LA reporter, they’re not sending any long term money just expirings. The hold up is that we want a 1st while we’re “technically” sending out long term money with Wiggins
MiamiLoyal926 wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:
Which is why I wonder who they meant by long term money? It’s either 1 or 2 seasons for Wiggins. Who else are they trying to trade here that has long term money?
That’s an LA reporter, they’re not sending any long term money just expirings. The hold up is that we want a 1st while we’re “technically” sending out long term money with Wiggins
My bad.. I see how that reads wrong. By “they” I mean Heat, and by trading “here”, I mean in this deal.
Proper English should read “Who else are we trying to trade in this deal that has long term money?”
Chalm Downs wrote:his nickname is boywonder ffs
3ammy3uck3ts wrote:SA37 wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote:
Why is a part-owner of the Utah Jazz talkin' 'bout "we"?
CHILL, that’s the man most responsible for this organizations success by a WIDE margin!!!
I didn't think I needed to add green font, but I guess I needed to RexBoyWonder wrote:Yes to Cuminga - but only for Wiggins and only for a short deal with a team option. Worthy gamble on a 22YO.
No to Lonzo ball
NO to Vucevic
We're not getting Giannis - don't start that chit again
/.
gom wrote:Not a bad start to off-season. Looking forward to free agency and summer league. Everyone ready?
RexBoyWonder wrote:Yes to Cuminga - but only for Wiggins and only for a short deal with a team option. Worthy gamble on a 22YO.
No to Lonzo ball
NO to Vucevic
We're not getting Giannis - don't start that chit again
/.
