ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,428
And1: 664
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#841 » by TwolvesFanRome » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:33 am

Klomp wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:According to you we will make trade next days ?

Or we are done waiting for Naz / Naw situation ?

I have a strong feeling that we are done.


I come back here Klomp because I read that after the Naz deal we are non able to sign both Randle and Naw avoiding the 2nd apron...so, a trade is coming?? Now according to me, yesssir! :D
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
User avatar
m2002brian
Analyst
Posts: 3,300
And1: 1,361
Joined: May 29, 2009
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#842 » by m2002brian » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:37 am

TwolvesFanRome wrote:
Klomp wrote:
TwolvesFanRome wrote:According to you we will make trade next days ?

Or we are done waiting for Naz / Naw situation ?

I have a strong feeling that we are done.


I come back here Klomp because I read that after the Naz deal we are non able to sign both Randle and Naw avoiding the 2nd aprono...so, a trade is coming?? Now according to me, yesssir! :D



I’m Not sure what’s happening here. But I like it and will Be watching intensely.
BLUEGREENRED
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,902
And1: 2,514
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#843 » by Slim Tubby » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:39 am

Danimals wrote:Hopefully Randle opts in and we can trade him for an upgrade at point guard.
Could a Randle for Coby White trade be justifiable by either team?

I struggle to come up with a realistic deal that lands us an upgrade at PG.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,352
And1: 852
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#844 » by Norseman79 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 2:24 pm

I keep going back to a sign and trade of Davion Mitchell and Jovic, plus a pick or two for Randle. I would consider Rozier in place of Mitchell for better draft compensation.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#845 » by shrink » Sat Jun 28, 2025 3:10 pm

Read on Twitter


There goes Ball.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#846 » by jpatrick » Sat Jun 28, 2025 3:13 pm

shrink wrote:
Read on Twitter


There goes Ball.


The knee was always going to be an issue. But Ball the player is a perfect fit for this roster. Ideal PG next to Ant and good enough defensively that can play next to Dilly.
Wolves21
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,656
And1: 469
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#847 » by Wolves21 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 3:56 pm

Well Ball is off the table now so who's going to end up as our PG ?

De'Aaron Fox
Derrick White
Alex Caruso
Coby White
Colin Sexton

Other ???
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,593
And1: 5,098
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#848 » by minimus » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:11 pm

Wolves21 wrote:Well Ball is off the table now so who's going to end up as our PG ?

De'Aaron Fox
Derrick White
Alex Caruso
Coby White
Colin Sexton

Other ???

Tre Jones
Tyus Jones
Ty Jerome
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,902
And1: 2,514
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#849 » by Slim Tubby » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:18 pm

minimus wrote:
Wolves21 wrote:Well Ball is off the table now so who's going to end up as our PG ?

De'Aaron Fox
Derrick White
Alex Caruso
Coby White
Colin Sexton

Other ???

Tre Jones
Tyus Jones
Ty Jerome
Your list is more realistic...and quite depressing.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,593
And1: 5,098
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#850 » by minimus » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:39 pm

Slim Tubby wrote:
minimus wrote:Tre Jones
Tyus Jones
Ty Jerome
Your list is more realistic...and quite depressing.


Well, if TC resigns Randle MIN have all same key players. NAW has been critical piece of rotation, but I think amount of potential between Dillingham, Clark and TJ is huge. I love Zikarsky as g-league bigman a lot. The only thing that I would love to add is a pass first third string PG like Ryan Nembhard to run out g-league team. Maybe Jordan McLaughlin will agree to sign on min.deal with us?
Wolves21
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,656
And1: 469
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#851 » by Wolves21 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:39 pm

Ty Jerome would be a good cheap pick up, but don't know how I'd feel with him as the starting PG, think he's a very good back up.

As far as the Jones brothers so tired of people bring them up year after year because they are from here and everyone is in love with them.Decent role players are all they are without a real impact on the game.At least a dozen better options then the Jones brothers and would rather role with and undersized Dillingham at PG then and undersized damn near 30 your old Tyus Jones.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#852 » by jpatrick » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:01 pm

Wolves21 wrote:Ty Jerome would be a good cheap pick up, but don't know how I'd feel with him as the starting PG, think he's a very good back up.

As far as the Jones brothers so tired of people bring them up year after year because they are from here and everyone is in love with them.Decent role players are all they are without a real impact on the game.At least a dozen better options then the Jones brothers and would rather role with and undersized Dillingham at PG then and undersized damn near 30 your old Tyus Jones.


Nothing about Ty Jerome will be cheap. I expect him, like NAW, to sign for at least the full MLE, which we can’t afford unless we let go of Randle and NAW.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,433
And1: 2,853
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#853 » by Neeva » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:18 pm

minimus wrote:
Wolves21 wrote:Well Ball is off the table now so who's going to end up as our PG ?

De'Aaron Fox
Derrick White
Alex Caruso
Coby White
Colin Sexton

Other ???

Tre Jones
Tyus Jones
Ty Jerome



Dejounte Murray (will be cheap coming off injury)
Jaden Ivey
Keyonte George eh
Scottie Pippen Jr.
Cole Anthony eh
Payton Pritchard

I expect Rob to have a good second year though.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#854 » by moss_is_1 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 6:41 pm

Of all those names the only one I'm interested in is Sexton. Tyus or Tre could be fine if they're pretty cheap I suppose. The other ones either will cost too much or aren't that good.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#855 » by jpatrick » Sat Jun 28, 2025 6:48 pm

[x]
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=XQD5PNDwat0WI1cFRdOyRQ[/x]

I know his name has been mentioned on here. And now off the board.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,593
And1: 5,098
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#856 » by minimus » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:08 pm

Davion is not a PG
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,059
And1: 5,696
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#857 » by winforlose » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:13 pm

Sometime this season the FO will realize the name we need to trade for is Coby White. The player we should have drafted instead of Jarrett Culver, and the player who fits very well in the Ant timeline.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/whiteco01.html
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#858 » by jpatrick » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:17 pm

winforlose wrote:Sometime this season the FO will realize the name we need to trade for is Coby White. The player we should have drafted instead of Jarrett Culver, and the player who fits very well in the Ant timeline.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/whiteco01.html


I would absolutely take White. The problem is money. Would have to send out DDV in the deal I believe. Nothing else really makes sense. Maybe that’s something that would interest Chicago. But then we’d have to extend White probably for 25m plus, which is just going to create ongoing cap issues.
Wolves21
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,656
And1: 469
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#859 » by Wolves21 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:25 pm

jpatrick wrote:
winforlose wrote:Sometime this season the FO will realize the name we need to trade for is Coby White. The player we should have drafted instead of Jarrett Culver, and the player who fits very well in the Ant timeline.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/whiteco01.html


I would absolutely take White. The problem is money. Would have to send out DDV in the deal I believe. Nothing else really makes sense. Maybe that’s something that would interest Chicago. But then we’d have to extend White probably for 25m plus, which is just going to create ongoing cap issues.


While not my 1st option to solve the PG issue Coby White could work and I'd be totally fine in a deal of Divincenzo,Dillingham and possible a future pick to get him. Think that's a fair deal for a non all-star caliber player and something the Bulls could get behind.

Yes we'd have to pay him but $25M wouldn't be a bad deal and you'd have Edwards,White,McDaniles & Reid all locked up long term for about $130M a year moving forward. Yes we'd more then likely have to move on from Gobert & Randle which we should anyways in the next few years to get closer to the cap.But you'd hope trading those players would net us some young cheap talent and picks that could fill out the roster around our core four.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,285
And1: 30,517
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#860 » by Domejandro » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:35 pm

Wolves21 wrote:
jpatrick wrote:
winforlose wrote:Sometime this season the FO will realize the name we need to trade for is Coby White. The player we should have drafted instead of Jarrett Culver, and the player who fits very well in the Ant timeline.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/whiteco01.html


I would absolutely take White. The problem is money. Would have to send out DDV in the deal I believe. Nothing else really makes sense. Maybe that’s something that would interest Chicago. But then we’d have to extend White probably for 25m plus, which is just going to create ongoing cap issues.


While not my 1st option to solve the PG issue Coby White could work and I'd be totally fine in a deal of Divincenzo,Dillingham and possible a future pick to get him. Think that's a fair deal for a non all-star caliber player and something the Bulls could get behind.

Yes we'd have to pay him but $25M wouldn't be a bad deal and you'd have Edwards,White,McDaniles & Reid all locked up long term for about $130M a year moving forward. Yes we'd more then likely have to move on from Gobert & Randle which we should anyways in the next few years to get closer to the cap.But you'd hope trading those players would net us some young cheap talent and picks that could fill out the roster around our core four.

As a note, Minnesota does not have any future firsts to trade, outside of 2029 6-30 protected (because of obligation to Utah) and swaps.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves