Image ImageImage Image

Shams: Lonzo for Okoro

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

wolffy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,294
And1: 661
Joined: Dec 07, 2002
Location: Pa.
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#141 » by wolffy » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:17 pm

Tetlak wrote:Its really not a big deal. If Okoro pops, he pops. If he doesn't, you move on. There's probably a higher probability of this guy being decent (because he's closer to his prime and has shown defense and ok 3 point shooting for multiple seasons at the NBA level) than whatever late 1st rookie we select, who in all likelihood would suck. We need to be realistic about how the draft works. Half of each class busts; sometimes even more.

This also seems to me as a way to push Pat and to a lesser extent Noa.

Lots of overreactions.


They took on an extra year of salary and got the worse player for no compensation. Id say the fact this isn't the 1st time AK has been this dumb is in fact an issue.
Senor Chang
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,319
And1: 1,291
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
Contact:

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#142 » by Senor Chang » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:19 pm

nomorezorro wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Okoro is a transition player, and this is a bet that he’ll look better in the #1 transition frequency offense than he did in the 18th (Cavs).


honestly this moved me from "don't like the trade but big picture, who cares" to "there could be a lil something there."

seems like there were some cleveland fans who were annoyed by them trying to force him into becoming a corner-standing 3-and-D guy and thought it was a square peg/round hole situation. think there is some actual upside here based on us asking him to fill a role more suited to his skills

I think AKME are trying to recreate the 2002 & 2003 new jersey nets teams that made back to back finals with giddy being the Jason kidd. Those nets teams had athletes who will run their opponents off the floor every night.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,202
And1: 6,308
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#143 » by Indomitable » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:22 pm

wolffy wrote:
Tetlak wrote:Its really not a big deal. If Okoro pops, he pops. If he doesn't, you move on. There's probably a higher probability of this guy being decent (because he's closer to his prime and has shown defense and ok 3 point shooting for multiple seasons at the NBA level) than whatever late 1st rookie we select, who in all likelihood would suck. We need to be realistic about how the draft works. Half of each class busts; sometimes even more.

This also seems to me as a way to push Pat and to a lesser extent Noa.

Lots of overreactions.


They took on an extra year of salary and got the worse player for no compensation. Id say the fact this isn't the 1st time AK has been this dumb is in fact an issue.

2 yrs. Lonzo can be cut after the season.
:banghead:
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,117
And1: 11,801
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#144 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:23 pm

Salo23 wrote:Ball had a team option for 2026, Okoro’s deal is guaranteed and cuts into that coveted summer 2026 cap space AKME keep emphasizing. Half measures.


We aren’t going after any big free agents in 2026.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 12,977
And1: 10,009
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#145 » by nomorezorro » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:24 pm

there are so many people confidently saying okoro is a worse player than 2025 lonzo ball and. i dunno man.

again, i don't like okoro as a player and i thought lonzo *looked* surprisingly good when he was on the floor but...the numbers are the numbers. and lonzo ball's numbers this year specifically were shooting 37% from the field and 34% on threes while putting up 8/3/3 in 35 total games
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 28,952
And1: 8,890
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#146 » by Chi town » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:24 pm

Okoro is clearly AK’s Nesmith.

Only way this makes sense is if he’s much better playing fast the whole game and we resign Tre.
boozapalooza
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,587
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#147 » by boozapalooza » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:26 pm

Read on Twitter


Cowley reports FOUR other teams were interested / in discussions for Lonzo. How was Okoro and no draft capital deemed the best return? There was a market here.

He also says he still would not rule out a Coby trade
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,202
And1: 6,308
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#148 » by Indomitable » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:27 pm

Dan Z wrote:
Tetlak wrote:
Dan Z wrote:AK couldn't even get one 2nd round pick for taking on the worst contract (out of the two) in this deal.

What an odd trade over all. I'd rather have Lonzo for the limited amount of games he'll play than Okoro.


Okoro makes less than the MLE...he makes less than some rookies, and he made the same amount as Lonzo Ball while actually being able to contribute on the court.

Although you didnt outright say he has a bad contract, mentioning his contract at all seems irrelevant due to the above factors.


His contract is fine, but I dont think much of him as a player. A decent role player at best.

The Cavs get to take a flier on Lonzo and if it doesn't work out they can opt out in a year. I'd like to think there's value in having flexibility.

Most people would. Just Akme is dumb.
:banghead:
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,236
And1: 11,104
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#149 » by MrSparkle » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:28 pm

I was hoping Patrick would take an Okoro valued deal. Still mind boggling to me he got way more ($33m vs 90m… wtf).
drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,036
And1: 4,182
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#150 » by drosestruts » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:29 pm

over the last 3 seasons Ball played 777 minutes

Okoro played 4,592


I like Ball more as a player, but Ball is more theoretical at this point and that's hard to deny.

Bulls NEED to re-sign Tre Jones after this. We look awful without a point guard, and Coby and Ayo aren't point guards.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 12,977
And1: 10,009
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#151 » by nomorezorro » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:29 pm

boozapalooza wrote:Cowley reports FOUR other teams were interested / in discussions for Lonzo. How was Okoro and no draft capital deemed the best return? There was a market here.


multiple teams can make bad-to-unremarkable trade offers

given the widespread salary crunch around the league, i imagine there was a lot of interest from teams who saw lonzo's contract as a way to ease their long-term financial obligations and *possibly* get a contributor in the process. i don't think teams were beating down our door because they specifically wanted a guy who has played 35 games in 3 seasons
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
boozapalooza
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,587
And1: 959
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#152 » by boozapalooza » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:30 pm

Also another fallout of this, isnt this just an upgraded version of Dalen Terry? What role does Dalen serve on the team now? We picked up his team option for $5.4M next year…I don’t see a path to him getting minutes. Nor do I see anyone looking to trade for him.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,243
And1: 8,972
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#153 » by Dan Z » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:33 pm

Chi town wrote:Okoro is clearly AK’s Nesmith.

Only way this makes sense is if he’s much better playing fast the whole game and we resign Tre.


The difference is that Nesmith's strength coming into the league was shooting. He struggled a bit in Boston, but figured it out.

Shooting had never been Okoro's strength, but he improved and is decent at it now. However, he's not as good at it as Nesmith and I'd be surprised if he ever reaches that level (not that he has to).
User avatar
Tetlak
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,264
And1: 2,346
Joined: Aug 16, 2010

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#154 » by Tetlak » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:34 pm

boozapalooza wrote:Also another fallout of this, isnt this just an upgraded version of Dalen Terry? What role does Dalen serve on the team now? We picked up his team option for $5.4M next year…I don’t see a path to him getting minutes. Nor do I see anyone looking to trade for him.


Dalen is more of a connector/slasher on offense.

Okoro is more of a spot up guy who can get an opportunistic cut.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,243
And1: 8,972
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#155 » by Dan Z » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:35 pm

boozapalooza wrote:
Read on Twitter


Cowley reports FOUR other teams were interested / in discussions for Lonzo. How was Okoro and no draft capital deemed the best return? There was a market here.

He also says he still would not rule out a Coby trade


It's because AK doesn't value draft picks.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,623
And1: 873
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#156 » by Almost Retired » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:36 pm

Sometimes a player needs to move into a different situation to flourish. I don't think this is a bad move. We kept Lonzo on a pretty nice deal and he got paid all through his injury saga. But that knee is not going to be healthy in the long run. That's unfortunate because in that half season we had a healthy Lonzo he was fun to watch. Now if we can just move Pat, for his sake as well as ours, then we have a guy that can defend wings. I think our front court defense is going to get better with Matas and Noa. We had to improve our defense 1-3.
Bulliever2020
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,283
And1: 2,550
Joined: Jul 13, 2018
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#157 » by Bulliever2020 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:36 pm

I definitely think Okoro will help us more than Lonzo would this year for the pure fact he will most likely be healthier. My problem with this is it pushes other players who either need playing time or need to be let go, further down the rotation which will in turn lower their value. I think the fundamental difference between how people are looking at the trade is in terms of Okoro's upside. Others may see something there, I don't. Decent 3+d player that you can pick up pretty much anywhere at any time. This just pushes us more solidly into the treadmill imo. This is a push for the playin move if I've ever seen one.
PlayinTourney4Lyfe
riselife
Sophomore
Posts: 239
And1: 108
Joined: Jun 21, 2008
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#158 » by riselife » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:38 pm

Well now the Bulls need to trade Vuch & Pat and just tank one more year for AJ Dybantsa or Peterson, I'm guessing that's the plan they have
riselife
Sophomore
Posts: 239
And1: 108
Joined: Jun 21, 2008
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#159 » by riselife » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:40 pm

Btw Okoro is still a young player, he had a few good games last year and a decent defender. He can be a nice bench player
User avatar
Tetlak
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,264
And1: 2,346
Joined: Aug 16, 2010

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#160 » by Tetlak » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:41 pm

drosestruts wrote:over the last 3 seasons Ball played 777 minutes

Okoro played 4,592


I like Ball more as a player, but Ball is more theoretical at this point and that's hard to deny.

Bulls NEED to re-sign Tre Jones after this. We look awful without a point guard, and Coby and Ayo aren't point guards.


Totally agree, but also kind of expecting them to try this weird jumbo thing

Return to Chicago Bulls