ImageImageImage

PF targets

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,561
And1: 13,091
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: PF targets 

Post#621 » by zeebneeb » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:00 pm

Apparently the Pistons were going to offer Naz a deal, but never got the chance, and have now turned full bore to Aldama. Lets see how this plays out.
LaSheed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,911
And1: 830
Joined: Jun 02, 2016
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#622 » by LaSheed » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:01 pm

Showing interest in NAW according to sources. I like NAW and it makes a Malik deal interesting.
User avatar
engelbert321
Head Coach
Posts: 7,396
And1: 1,463
Joined: Jul 24, 2011
 

Re: PF targets 

Post#623 » by engelbert321 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:08 pm

At this point, i’m all in for Aldama
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,203
And1: 18,208
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#624 » by Snakebites » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:34 pm

Aldama’s restricted status makes him a dead end IMO.

I would have been all for the idea of going after Naz, but we never had a shot given how that went down.
LaSheed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,911
And1: 830
Joined: Jun 02, 2016
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#625 » by LaSheed » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:45 pm

Snakebites wrote:Aldama’s restricted status makes him a dead end IMO.

I would have been all for the idea of going after Naz, but we never had a shot given how that went down.


Yes sir.

I found myself going back and forth on going after Naz/Aldama but recently have thinking maybe we should use those resources on a #2 option. Each passing day seems a #2 just isn't available right now for the right price in this sellers market.

Maybe it's Ivey? Idk i guess I'm trying to build a team in what I thought was the traditional way. Batman in backcourt & Robin in front court. Or vise versa. We shall see!
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,329
And1: 7,048
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: PF targets 

Post#626 » by whitehops » Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:51 pm

Snakebites wrote:Aldama’s restricted status makes him a dead end IMO.

I would have been all for the idea of going after Naz, but we never had a shot given how that went down.


it's still possible through sign and trade, depends on how their contract negotiations go i guess. we'd just have to give something up and i don't think fontecchio is going to cut it. it's all a matter of what we're willing to give up to entice them to trade aldama vs. re-signing him.

that said, i don't know why they wouldn't re-sign him, they're not exactly in cap trouble and have that spot to fill anyways.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,203
And1: 18,208
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#627 » by Snakebites » Sat Jun 28, 2025 8:04 pm

whitehops wrote:
Snakebites wrote:Aldama’s restricted status makes him a dead end IMO.

I would have been all for the idea of going after Naz, but we never had a shot given how that went down.


it's still possible through sign and trade, depends on how their contract negotiations go i guess. we'd just have to give something up and i don't think fontecchio is going to cut it. it's all a matter of what we're willing to give up to entice them to trade aldama vs. re-signing him.

that said, i don't know why they wouldn't re-sign him, they're not exactly in cap trouble and have that spot to fill anyways.


To me the Bane trade was made to give them the flexibility to keep the rest of their team intact.

Us landing Aldama just isn’t a possibility that fits with the events we’ve already seen happen. That doesn’t make it impossible but it doesn’t feel very likely.

The Grizzlies hold all the cards here- so we’d need to make it worth their while AND Aldama would have to want to come here in preference to whatever other options may be out there.
catari11
Sophomore
Posts: 105
And1: 40
Joined: Jun 24, 2022

Re: PF targets 

Post#628 » by catari11 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 8:58 pm

if Aldama is a very long shot where does that leave the Pistons? Markkanen? is he just another longshot given Ainge's propensity to jack up compensation?
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,561
And1: 13,091
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: PF targets 

Post#629 » by zeebneeb » Sat Jun 28, 2025 9:05 pm

Aldama is NOT a long shot at all. Pistons can absolutely make some small moves to free up more cap space to make Aldama an offer, Memphis will not match. I believe this is the correct path forward. To me, the Pistons are a full time starting PF away from truly competing.

It is ALL on Langdon, and how he perceives Aldama. If he wants him, he can easily land him, even without a S&T.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,299
And1: 9,797
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#630 » by tmorgan » Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:17 pm

zeebneeb wrote:Aldama is NOT a long shot at all. Pistons can absolutely make some small moves to free up more cap space to make Aldama an offer, Memphis will not match. I believe this is the correct path forward. To me, the Pistons are a full time starting PF away from truly competing.

It is ALL on Langdon, and how he perceives Aldama. If he wants him, he can easily land him, even without a S&T.


But this sort of approach would require a significant overpay, which isn’t a good idea at all with where we are headed.

The only “I want to leave” thing I ever saw with Aldama was his incident with Bane. Bane is gone. So getting him to want to leave AND getting Memphis to not match our offer will require a big contract, probably Naz level or close, and that’s not smart for us.
catari11
Sophomore
Posts: 105
And1: 40
Joined: Jun 24, 2022

Re: PF targets 

Post#631 » by catari11 » Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:52 pm

zeebneeb wrote:Aldama is NOT a long shot at all. Pistons can absolutely make some small moves to free up more cap space to make Aldama an offer, Memphis will not match. I believe this is the correct path forward. To me, the Pistons are a full time starting PF away from truly competing.

It is ALL on Langdon, and how he perceives Aldama. If he wants him, he can easily land him, even without a S&T.


I'm not familiar with Aldama other than his stats. But on paper he appears to be exactly what the Pistons need. I agree that TL should make Aldama an offer that he can't refuse and that Memphis won't match. There is a window of opportunity next season and it will close quickly (Orlando and Charlotte improved significantly and Cleveland, NYC, and Indiana remain atop of the field). Pistons can challenge if they make the right moves and Aldama could be the player that catalyzing a rapid ascent.
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,329
And1: 7,048
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: PF targets 

Post#632 » by whitehops » Sat Jun 28, 2025 11:55 pm

personally i think we just need a good backup PF. aldama would be great off the bench as a super-sub but he'll likely get like 20M/year. i'd be totally fine with a less expensive alternative as it would be nice to upgrade from fontecchio.
LaSheed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,911
And1: 830
Joined: Jun 02, 2016
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#633 » by LaSheed » Sun Jun 29, 2025 12:00 am

Laravia for backup PF!
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,561
And1: 13,091
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: PF targets 

Post#634 » by zeebneeb » Sun Jun 29, 2025 12:58 am

tmorgan wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:Aldama is NOT a long shot at all. Pistons can absolutely make some small moves to free up more cap space to make Aldama an offer, Memphis will not match. I believe this is the correct path forward. To me, the Pistons are a full time starting PF away from truly competing.

It is ALL on Langdon, and how he perceives Aldama. If he wants him, he can easily land him, even without a S&T.


But this sort of approach would require a significant overpay, which isn’t a good idea at all with where we are headed.

The only “I want to leave” thing I ever saw with Aldama was his incident with Bane. Bane is gone. So getting him to want to leave AND getting Memphis to not match our offer will require a big contract, probably Naz level or close, and that’s not smart for us.
It all depends on how you view the current Pistons roster. I watched a team, without Stewart, and Ivey, along with zero playoff experience, come within a bad call, and bumbling mistakes, from advancing to the second round.

I firmly believe Aldama would be an ideal fit for the roster. It all depends on how you view it.

I understand completely of other folks don't see it.
User avatar
Strawder
Sophomore
Posts: 101
And1: 13
Joined: Apr 20, 2002
Location: Ann Arbor

Re: PF targets 

Post#635 » by Strawder » Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:21 am

Does Indiana have to cut salary to resign Turner? If so, I'd offer them a couple of seconds and/or Fontechio for Toppin
He's signed for the next 3 years for 14. 15 and 16m and would fit nicely splitting time with Harris. He has his warts ( bad hands. Bad handle, and so-so defense) but he can shoot the 3, is a great finisher and runs the floor very well. They also have a former lottery pick. Jarace Walker who can step in for Toppin

It's not a home run but it would upgrade the roster and his salary would fit in our existing cap space which wouldn't impact any other signing since we're proceeding as an over the gap team.

And if we can't resign Schroeder, I'd look at Tyus Jones.

Sent from my SM-A166U using RealGM mobile app
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,328
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#636 » by Kalamazoo317 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:25 am

zeebneeb wrote:
tmorgan wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:Aldama is NOT a long shot at all. Pistons can absolutely make some small moves to free up more cap space to make Aldama an offer, Memphis will not match. I believe this is the correct path forward. To me, the Pistons are a full time starting PF away from truly competing.

It is ALL on Langdon, and how he perceives Aldama. If he wants him, he can easily land him, even without a S&T.


But this sort of approach would require a significant overpay, which isn’t a good idea at all with where we are headed.

The only “I want to leave” thing I ever saw with Aldama was his incident with Bane. Bane is gone. So getting him to want to leave AND getting Memphis to not match our offer will require a big contract, probably Naz level or close, and that’s not smart for us.
It all depends on how you view the current Pistons roster. I watched a team, without Stewart, and Ivey, along with zero playoff experience, come within a bad call, and bumbling mistakes, from advancing to the second round.

I firmly believe Aldama would be an ideal fit for the roster. It all depends on how you view it.

I understand completely of other folks don't see it.


That's how I see the roster too, which is why I wouldn't overpay for any additions and would try hard to bring Beasley and Shroder back.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,299
And1: 9,797
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: PF targets 

Post#637 » by tmorgan » Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:46 am

zeebneeb wrote:
tmorgan wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:Aldama is NOT a long shot at all. Pistons can absolutely make some small moves to free up more cap space to make Aldama an offer, Memphis will not match. I believe this is the correct path forward. To me, the Pistons are a full time starting PF away from truly competing.

It is ALL on Langdon, and how he perceives Aldama. If he wants him, he can easily land him, even without a S&T.


But this sort of approach would require a significant overpay, which isn’t a good idea at all with where we are headed.

The only “I want to leave” thing I ever saw with Aldama was his incident with Bane. Bane is gone. So getting him to want to leave AND getting Memphis to not match our offer will require a big contract, probably Naz level or close, and that’s not smart for us.
It all depends on how you view the current Pistons roster. I watched a team, without Stewart, and Ivey, along with zero playoff experience, come within a bad call, and bumbling mistakes, from advancing to the second round.

I firmly believe Aldama would be an ideal fit for the roster. It all depends on how you view it.

I understand completely of other folks don't see it.


I do think Aldama fits. I also think paying him north of 20 mil a year (which it will likely take to get him) will make his contract difficult to trade later, so he’ll need to really excel, and quickly. I also think a contract that big will cause troubles as we try to extend our rookie deals, try and keep Tobias at a lower salary, and try and keep other veterans like Beasley and Schroder.

Drafting so many key rotation players in a three year span means a salary reckoning is coming, and we either need to keep the books clean or trade one or two guys before they get paid.
Neptune
Veteran
Posts: 2,703
And1: 1,388
Joined: Jan 30, 2014

Re: PF targets 

Post#638 » by Neptune » Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:23 am

Please don't offer Aldama 20 mil, please!

If we want a PF, sign one thats better then Harris, if that said PF isn't available, wait until one is!
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,128
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: PF targets 

Post#639 » by Canadafan » Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:28 am

Id take Aldama. Maybe that's what Shröder means. We are gonna operate as a cap space team to go for someone thus squeezing him out. Not using our bird rights on him
User avatar
Rip32
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,519
And1: 298
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: PF targets 

Post#640 » by Rip32 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:31 am

engelbert321 wrote:At this point, i’m all in for Aldama

I think we can get Santi! Make a legit offer. Regardless, it's going to put Memphis in a pickle trying to pay JJJ and fielding a competitive team.
I wouldn't understand the signing of NAW. He's basically a 2 guard
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:

Return to Detroit Pistons