Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- kulaz3000
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 42,613
- And1: 24,827
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Doesn’t move the needle, however, this is a move that we are continuing the youth movement and that’s a direction I can get behind.
Why so serious?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 2,699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Lexluthor wrote:
This post does not make sense . The giddey for Caruso trade was a win - win for both teams and Lonzo Ball barely is always injured
My favorite part of this post is what it means when … bull and kings trade with each other?
Are the both just on other line acting the same way haha
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,861
- And1: 8,960
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
vxmike wrote:Chi town wrote:Dan Z wrote:I asked this earlier, but I'll ask it again because I forgot that some of you think Giddey should play SF (on defense).
What do the minutes/rotation look like for the Bulls forwards next year?
Tre 24 Ayo 24
Coby 32 Okoro 16
Giddey 32 Huerter 16
Buz 32 Pat 16 Noa DNP Blowout mins
Vuc 24 Collins 12 Smith 12
It’s a deep roster of 12 very average guys. Our best player is easily the worst #1 option out of all 30 NBA teams.
It's a bet that 2 of Matas, Giddey, or Coby step up to all star level, once all of the debris of the old roster is removed.

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,268
- And1: 8,985
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
vxmike wrote:Chi town wrote:Dan Z wrote:I asked this earlier, but I'll ask it again because I forgot that some of you think Giddey should play SF (on defense).
What do the minutes/rotation look like for the Bulls forwards next year?
Tre 24 Ayo 24
Coby 32 Okoro 16
Giddey 32 Huerter 16
Buz 32 Pat 16 Noa DNP Blowout mins
Vuc 24 Collins 12 Smith 12
It’s a deep roster of 12 very average guys. Our best player is easily the worst #1 option out of all 30 NBA teams.
I just looked at a list of NBA teams and you're right except for the Nets (who is their #1? Cam Thomas? Cam Johnson?). Sad.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,600
- And1: 4,515
- Joined: Sep 24, 2014
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Dan Z wrote:vxmike wrote:Chi town wrote:
Tre 24 Ayo 24
Coby 32 Okoro 16
Giddey 32 Huerter 16
Buz 32 Pat 16 Noa DNP Blowout mins
Vuc 24 Collins 12 Smith 12
It’s a deep roster of 12 very average guys. Our best player is easily the worst #1 option out of all 30 NBA teams.
I just looked at a list of NBA teams and you're right except for the Nets (who is their #1? Cam Thomas? Cam Johnson?). Sad.
Yup forgot about BKN but they have like $80m to spend this summer and might end up with someone.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,144
- And1: 1,092
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Benn reading about how absolutely stacked the '26 draft is.....so of course instead of trying to get a superstar, AK is trading for potential guys who can improve to be marginal rotation players! #WINNING
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 2,699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
I like this trade. Honestly, in an alternate universe with slightly different context, the Ball, Lavine, DeRozan, and Caruso trades are all solid, reasonable, quality trades.
AKME is doing solid job of tear down and rebuild. Sure, they are sacrificing value, but they are operating the market like a team with a strategy of full rebuild.
Things is, I would give them solid-to-high marks on all trades if they were a FO coming in new and having to deal with the team dealt to them by the prior FO. Sadly, they are their own prior FO haha. So I can’t really give to many pats on back for this year down and rebuild, even though I do appreciate the direction. They’ll get their accolades if/when it turns into a legit deep playoff team.
AKME is doing solid job of tear down and rebuild. Sure, they are sacrificing value, but they are operating the market like a team with a strategy of full rebuild.
Things is, I would give them solid-to-high marks on all trades if they were a FO coming in new and having to deal with the team dealt to them by the prior FO. Sadly, they are their own prior FO haha. So I can’t really give to many pats on back for this year down and rebuild, even though I do appreciate the direction. They’ll get their accolades if/when it turns into a legit deep playoff team.
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- kulaz3000
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 42,613
- And1: 24,827
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Okoro is going to have more value than Lonzo eventually, just because Lonzo is just not going to be able to play more than 40 or so games per season.
Plus, Okoro is improving his shot, young, athletic and on a dirt cheap contract. It’s not like we won’t be able to move him again if required.
I’m betting when it’s all said and done, we are going to get a lot more production out of Okoro over Lonzo the next 2-3 seasons, whether it be on the floor or as a future trade asset.
Plus, Okoro is improving his shot, young, athletic and on a dirt cheap contract. It’s not like we won’t be able to move him again if required.
I’m betting when it’s all said and done, we are going to get a lot more production out of Okoro over Lonzo the next 2-3 seasons, whether it be on the floor or as a future trade asset.
Why so serious?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,268
- And1: 8,985
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
RastaBull wrote:I like this trade. Honestly, in an alternate universe with slightly different context, the Ball, Lavine, DeRozan, and Caruso trades are all solid, reasonable, quality trades.
AKME is doing solid job of tear down and rebuild. Sure, they are sacrificing value, but they are operating the market like a team with a strategy of full rebuild.
Things is, I would give them solid-to-high marks on all trades if they were a FO coming in new and having to deal with the team dealt to them by the prior FO. Sadly, they are their own prior FO haha. So I can’t really give to many pats on back for this year down and rebuild, even though I do appreciate the direction. They’ll get their accolades if/when it turns into a legit deep playoff team.
If they were doing a full rebuild then they'd figure out a way to get additional picks to work with (by either using them to draft someone or in a trade).
For example, if they did the Memphis trade (not sure if that was true....Ball for a contract plus pick) then maybe they draft a 3&D guy and have no interest in Okoro? Now they'd have a rookie to develop who is on a rookie contract (cheap) and has potential to be better than Okoro (obviously we won't know that...I haven't named a possible player the Bulls would draft and whoever it is also has a possibility of not working out).
I see this trade not as a full rebuild, but as a way to eek out a few more wins.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 2,699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
I also like this trade because it feels like it is an extension of Lavine trade. I’m hoping this trade means Bulls are seriously trying to bring back Tre Jones (an asset from Lavine trade). He looked really good in the Billy-Giddey system. He brings balance that system needs: defense, second ball handlers with high IQ decision making, maximizing shot efficiency.
After seeing Giddey’s ascension (I didn’t expect this) I love idea of finding guys that clearly had raw talent and theoretically have attributes that fit around Giddey, and giving them a new opportunity here.
Okoro fits that, much like I think Tre fit it. Here’s to hoping he capitalizes similarly.
After seeing Giddey’s ascension (I didn’t expect this) I love idea of finding guys that clearly had raw talent and theoretically have attributes that fit around Giddey, and giving them a new opportunity here.
Okoro fits that, much like I think Tre fit it. Here’s to hoping he capitalizes similarly.
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,268
- And1: 8,985
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
kulaz3000 wrote:Okoro is going to have more value than Lonzo eventually, just because Lonzo is just not going to be able to play more than 40 or so games per season.
Plus, Okoro is improving his shot, young, athletic and on a dirt cheap contract. It’s not like we won’t be able to move him again if required.
I’m betting when it’s all said and done, we are going to get a lot more production out of Okoro over Lonzo the next 2-3 seasons, whether it be on the floor or as a future trade asset.
Part of Lonzo's value was his contract.
Okoro will probably give the Bulls more production this year than Lonzo, but what does that do? Increase our chances of getting into the play-in?
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,251
- And1: 4,214
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
I've come around on this deal and now I like it. I think we start Okoro possibly, for defense
White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/PWill/Noa
Vuc (please deal him)/Collins/JSmith
Pretty good lineup, well balanced and should be fun to watch. Still tons of 2026 cap space, with all our picks and the Port pick. I eventually would like to see Matas/Noa start at the forwards
White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/PWill/Noa
Vuc (please deal him)/Collins/JSmith
Pretty good lineup, well balanced and should be fun to watch. Still tons of 2026 cap space, with all our picks and the Port pick. I eventually would like to see Matas/Noa start at the forwards
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,594
- And1: 9,141
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
It's hard to get angry over a meh move.
Lonzo isn't worth s*** right now and the 1st round pick from Memphis involved Smart with his contract and unless that was only lightly protected/unprotected it's hard to get upset over it.
Meh all round.
Lonzo isn't worth s*** right now and the 1st round pick from Memphis involved Smart with his contract and unless that was only lightly protected/unprotected it's hard to get upset over it.
Meh all round.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- Dominator83
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,988
- And1: 32,064
- Joined: Jan 16, 2005
- Location: NBA Hell
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
_txchilibowl_ wrote:MGB8 wrote:_txchilibowl_ wrote:
Or....Lonzo is viewed as a bigger negative asset than Okoro around the league. Quite frankly, the cap situation is probably the only reason Cleveland even entertained this idea.
Lonzo is on effectively 1 year deal. And even with his injury issues, and with struggles last season (though an amazing come back and still looked damned good considering the layoff, still showed his bball IQ and could hand on D)… you can hope the shot fully returns to form.
Okoro averaged 6 ppg in 20 minutes and his D wasn’t that great, either…. And you have to pay him not just 11 M this year but 12 M next.
It is stupid and unjustifiable. Unused cap space is better than Isaac Okoro at 11.8 M - unless he takes a huge leap forward.
It's completely justifiable. You just don't like it. Okoro is the better, younger player who still has some upside and is signed to a team friendly contract. He doesn't need to make a huge leap forward to be worth a below average contract. He just needs to be a little bit better, which isn't a huge ask for someone as young as him.
And if the Bulls need to clear a 11 million dollar expiring contract it won't be that hard.
Yea i really don't hate this trade. As i mentioned in an earlier post, we're looking for other Team's Markkanens. High picks who underperfromed for their drafting teams, then the lightbulb turned on later. *IF* Giddey continues to play like post-ASB Giddey, then they've already found one taking that avenue. I don't really have an issue taking a similiar swing with Okoro here especially considering its a low-risk move. Lonzo will never be the guy from 2021. Okoro MIGHT turn out to be what AKME thought Pat would be.
If hes not, well atleast his contract is short term and not anything crazy. Cuts into capspace a little, but capspace is wildly overrated these days, as the true A-listers almost never reach UFA anymore due to extensions being too lucrative to turn down. Capspace these days usually leads to overpaying guys like PG13 as if they're Lebron james. Now, if were investing capspace in Okoro while next summer was headed for a 2010 level star studded free agency of A-listers in their prime, then i would be pissed! Currently i believe Doncic is scheduled to be a FA next summer, but i would be really surprised if he ever reaches FA, he'll likely sign an extension. But if he does, then all we need is 1 MAX slot

Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..
For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,268
- And1: 8,985
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
pipfan wrote:I've come around on this deal and now I like it. I think we start Okoro possibly, for defense
White/Jones/Carter
Okoro/Ayo/Terry
Giddey/Huerter/Phillips
Matas/PWill/Noa
Vuc (please deal him)/Collins/JSmith
Pretty good lineup, well balanced and should be fun to watch. Still tons of 2026 cap space, with all our picks and the Port pick. I eventually would like to see Matas/Noa start at the forwards
The trade is fine...it's minor...but I wish AK would think bigger, such as taking the Memphis deal (if that was true). Same with the New Orleans deal in the draft.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,268
- And1: 8,985
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Dez wrote:It's hard to get angry over a meh move.
Lonzo isn't worth s*** right now and the 1st round pick from Memphis involved Smart with his contract and unless that was only lightly protected/unprotected it's hard to get upset over it.
Meh all round.
Marcus Smart would've been fine. He'd provide defense this year and then his contract expires, but that ship sailed.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 816
- And1: 488
- Joined: Dec 08, 2021
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
We have to remind ourselves that during the season, at least 2 players are always injured so it's nice to have some plug and play depth.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,144
- And1: 1,092
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
RastaBull wrote:Lexluthor wrote:
This post does not make sense . The giddey for Caruso trade was a win - win for both teams and Lonzo Ball barely is always injured
My favorite part of this post is what it means when … bull and kings trade with each other?
Are the both just on other line acting the same way haha
It's the sequel to dumb and dumberer.
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,268
- And1: 8,985
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
Dominator83 wrote:_txchilibowl_ wrote:MGB8 wrote:
Lonzo is on effectively 1 year deal. And even with his injury issues, and with struggles last season (though an amazing come back and still looked damned good considering the layoff, still showed his bball IQ and could hand on D)… you can hope the shot fully returns to form.
Okoro averaged 6 ppg in 20 minutes and his D wasn’t that great, either…. And you have to pay him not just 11 M this year but 12 M next.
It is stupid and unjustifiable. Unused cap space is better than Isaac Okoro at 11.8 M - unless he takes a huge leap forward.
It's completely justifiable. You just don't like it. Okoro is the better, younger player who still has some upside and is signed to a team friendly contract. He doesn't need to make a huge leap forward to be worth a below average contract. He just needs to be a little bit better, which isn't a huge ask for someone as young as him.
And if the Bulls need to clear a 11 million dollar expiring contract it won't be that hard.
Yea i really don't hate this trade. As i mentioned in an earlier post, we're looking for other Team's Markkanens. High picks who underperfromed for their drafting teams, then the lightbulb turned on later. *IF* Giddey continues to play like post-ASB Giddey, then they've already found one taking that avenue. I don't really have an issue taking a similiar swing with Okoro here especially considering its a low-risk move. Lonzo will never be the guy from 2021. Okoro MIGHT turn out to be what AKME thought Pat would be.
If hes not, well atleast his contract is short term and not anything crazy. Cuts into capspace a little, but capspace is wildly overrated these days, as the true A-listers almost never reach UFA anymore due to extensions being too lucrative to turn down. Capspace these days usually leads to overpaying guys like PG13 as if they're Lebron james. Now, if were investing capspace in Okoro while next summer was headed for a 2010 level star studded free agency of A-listers in their prime, then i would be pissed! Currently i believe Doncic is scheduled to be a FA next summer, but i would be really surprised if he ever reaches FA, he'll likely sign an extension. But if he does, then all we need is 1 MAX slot
If AK thinks that Okoro is going to take a leap forward like Markkanen did then he's fooling himself. At this point I bet he is what he is (which isn't bad...he's solid)
It's a minor move, so it's not a big deal to me. However, like I said in a previous reply, I'd like AK to think bigger (such as the Memphis trade if it was offered...another example is the New Orleans deal in this past draft, but that one didn't involve Lonzo).
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
- t-time
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,276
- And1: 1,982
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
-
Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro
I don’t understand what the big deal is here. Let’s give him a chance.
It’s like the Giddey trade thread which was full of ridiculous takes and comments which turned out to be completely wrong and premature.
It’s like the Giddey trade thread which was full of ridiculous takes and comments which turned out to be completely wrong and premature.