Reeko wrote:Scase wrote:Reeko wrote:Who gives two **** about what non Raptors fans, who have no clue what's been transpiring, and are devoid of all context, think. You think they know that the nepo baby who fired him is the same one that has been running the Blue Jays into the ground for the past decade?
I think the point is being missed here, ignoring the specific Rogers angle of it, every single non raps fan I've seen on both the general boards and reddit are saying essentially the same few things.
Weird they did it right after the draft.
They had no idea what direction the team was headed in.
Baffling/bad moves made and a bad team the last few years.
The latter 2 are pretty straight forward and if anything, not being a raps fan makes that a more objective viewpoint. It's also what a lot of people have been saying here. Whether or not Ed fired him cause he hates him, there was plenty of ammo to justify the firing.
It can be justified and rationalized. But this is why I said what I said, they're devoid of all context. Those other fans are looking at things on a surface level and believe that the firing was performance related when it wasn't, at least not to anyone who understands how cycles work.
These guys don't understand that the reason why the moves have been so puzzling is because the FO was trying to thread the needle by attempting to be competitive in order to appease ownership, while also trying to rebuild. These non Raps fans are wondering why we didn't just do a proper rebuild, and that's because they don't understand that ownership, especially this one, was never going to allow that to happen.
This is where you lost me. I don't buy the excuse that everything was because of the ownership, Masai has never, in his entire career as an exec, performed a rebuild. He
always re-tools, and every move made since the chip is on brand, they have just largely been bad moves. He's never overly valued FRPs, he always trades to get guys cause we can't get FA signings, and it definitely wasn't the ownership telling him to fill the team with people who can't shoot.
I cannot in good conscience try and pin this on the ownership. They were all Masai type moves, they just didn't pan out the way some of the others did. The ownership can be bad, and Masai doing a poor job are not mutually exclusive. Why did the ownership just suddenly decide to be up his ass? It's not like the stakes in MLSE changed in summer of 2019, hell they didn't even really change until 2024.
Credit does not get to be given to Masai for the good moves, and the bad stuff blamed on Rogers meddling.