Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,303
And1: 1,416
Joined: May 27, 2007

Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#1 » by cucad8 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:50 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=W3AhmYjd2L6eEUvNMZCDyg&s=19
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,303
And1: 1,416
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#2 » by cucad8 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:51 pm

Sorry for the typo in the title, if a mod can fix?
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,101
And1: 14,461
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#3 » by cgf » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:57 pm

Good deal
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 21,341
And1: 8,153
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#4 » by jayjaysee » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Feels cheap to me. Roster is expensive. But this is good value. And there was no big money for Randle this offseason

Randle gets a player option so likely only a two year deal, Minnesota gets to run the bigs back.
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 20,465
And1: 18,480
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#5 » by Mavrelous » Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Great deal for the Wolves.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Fortune favours the bold, so it ducked Nico Harrison.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#6 » by nykballa2k4 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:00 pm

Good stuff! I think that keeps him at a movable number as well in case of trade.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
SA37
RealGM
Posts: 18,937
And1: 9,708
Joined: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Basking in the Glory
 

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#7 » by SA37 » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:07 pm

Seems like the right value for Randle.
ReggiesKnicks
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#8 » by ReggiesKnicks » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:20 pm

Good value. This is what teams need to be trying to get weaker 2nd options/good 3rd options at price wise.
Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,777
And1: 8,088
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Re: Shams: Randleb 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#9 » by Mamba4Goat » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:21 pm

cucad8 wrote:Sorry for the typo in the title, if a mod can fix?

Done
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,722
And1: 19,829
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#10 » by shrink » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:24 pm

I think we are going to see more and more deals of this $30-35 mil size for comparable players. Randle wasn’t an All Star this year (though he would have been if he played like he did to end the season, and first two playoff series!), and I think #2 options that aren’t true stars will not automatically get, or expect, the max.

Still, with the way the cap is expected to rise so quickly the next several years, this deal is pretty good. Randle wanted to stay in Minnesota, and there weren’t a lot of free agent suitors for leverage, so both sides are probably pretty happy with this one.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,722
And1: 19,829
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#11 » by shrink » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:29 pm

I would add, the Randle deal doesn’t necessarily mean NAW is gone.

As I explained in another thread, Connelly should outbid t-MLE offers and perhaps pay all the way up to the $14.1 MLE, and worry about payroll later.
ReggiesKnicks
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#12 » by ReggiesKnicks » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:36 pm

shrink wrote:I would add, the Randle deal doesn’t necessarily mean NAW is gone.

As I explained in another thread, Connelly should outbid t-MLE offers and perhaps pay all the way up to the $14.1 MLE, and worry about payroll later.


I think the Dunc'd on podcast mentioned this back in Late April/Early May.

Basically all of their players (Naz/Randle/NAW) will be tradable on their new contracts. Sign them now, see where the team is in January/Early February. If they are a Top team in the NBA, maybe the owners pay this year like Cleveland and other franchises are doing. If they aren't playing at that level, they can move off of one of the deals.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,836
And1: 6,549
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#13 » by gswhoops » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:42 pm

I guess we can put the questions of whether the new ownership is willing to pay up to bed for a while.

Both the Naz and Randle deals are fair, but at the top end of "fair" IMO.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,578
And1: 6,060
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#14 » by winforlose » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:46 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
shrink wrote:I would add, the Randle deal doesn’t necessarily mean NAW is gone.

As I explained in another thread, Connelly should outbid t-MLE offers and perhaps pay all the way up to the $14.1 MLE, and worry about payroll later.


I think the Dunc'd on podcast mentioned this back in Late April/Early May.

Basically all of their players (Naz/Randle/NAW) will be tradable on their new contracts. Sign them now, see where the team is in January/Early February. If they are a Top team in the NBA, maybe the owners pay this year like Cleveland and other franchises are doing. If they aren't playing at that level, they can move off of one of the deals.


There are 3 problems with this. This reply is also for @Shrink

1. There are draft pick penalties for being in the 2nd apron for more than 2 of a 5 year period. We were a 2nd apron team in 24/25. If we go into it in 25/26 then we are either out of it the next three seasons, or taking a poison pill for our pick 7 years out.

2. Roster space is at a premium for this team. We had 15 players, remove Ingles and add Joan and we are back at 15. Even if we let go of Garza we still don’t have a PG and now have an incredible tax bill to add even a minimum PG.

3. NAW log jams the rotation. Clark and TSJ both have great potential but cannot develop stuck behind NAW and DDV. If Dilly takes the backup PG minutes that forces multiple players to share the remaining SG/SF backup minutes. Better to clean the slate and try to get assets out of a sign and trade for NAW.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,836
And1: 6,549
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#15 » by gswhoops » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:53 pm

winforlose wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
shrink wrote:I would add, the Randle deal doesn’t necessarily mean NAW is gone.

As I explained in another thread, Connelly should outbid t-MLE offers and perhaps pay all the way up to the $14.1 MLE, and worry about payroll later.


I think the Dunc'd on podcast mentioned this back in Late April/Early May.

Basically all of their players (Naz/Randle/NAW) will be tradable on their new contracts. Sign them now, see where the team is in January/Early February. If they are a Top team in the NBA, maybe the owners pay this year like Cleveland and other franchises are doing. If they aren't playing at that level, they can move off of one of the deals.


There are 3 problems with this. This reply is also for @Shrink

1. There are draft pick penalties for being in the 2nd apron for more than 2 of a 5 year period. We were a 2nd apron team in 24/25. If we go into it in 25/26 then we are either out of it the next three seasons, or taking a poison pill for our pick 7 years out.

2. Roster space is at a premium for this team. We had 15 players, remove Ingles and add Joan and we are back at 15. Even if we let go of Garza we still don’t have a PG and now have an incredible tax bill to add even a minimum PG.

3. NAW log jams the rotation. Clark and TSJ both have great potential but cannot develop stuck behind NAW and DDV. If Dilly takes the backup PG minutes that forces multiple players to share the remaining SG/SF backup minutes. Better to clean the slate and try to get assets out of a sign and trade for NAW.

Are we 100% that Joan is even coming over this year? Might make sense to park him in Europe for a season given the roster and tax constraints the Wolves are operating under.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,578
And1: 6,060
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#16 » by winforlose » Sun Jun 29, 2025 6:54 pm

gswhoops wrote:
winforlose wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
I think the Dunc'd on podcast mentioned this back in Late April/Early May.

Basically all of their players (Naz/Randle/NAW) will be tradable on their new contracts. Sign them now, see where the team is in January/Early February. If they are a Top team in the NBA, maybe the owners pay this year like Cleveland and other franchises are doing. If they aren't playing at that level, they can move off of one of the deals.


There are 3 problems with this. This reply is also for @Shrink

1. There are draft pick penalties for being in the 2nd apron for more than 2 of a 5 year period. We were a 2nd apron team in 24/25. If we go into it in 25/26 then we are either out of it the next three seasons, or taking a poison pill for our pick 7 years out.

2. Roster space is at a premium for this team. We had 15 players, remove Ingles and add Joan and we are back at 15. Even if we let go of Garza we still don’t have a PG and now have an incredible tax bill to add even a minimum PG.

3. NAW log jams the rotation. Clark and TSJ both have great potential but cannot develop stuck behind NAW and DDV. If Dilly takes the backup PG minutes that forces multiple players to share the remaining SG/SF backup minutes. Better to clean the slate and try to get assets out of a sign and trade for NAW.

Are we 100% that Joan is even coming over this year? Might make sense to park him in Europe for a season given the roster and tax constraints the Wolves are operating under.


The Wolves need a backup C. If they don’t bring him then they are gonna have the same problem they had last season. Running it back is a bad idea. Imbalance at the PG and C will cost us in the playoffs again.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,836
And1: 6,549
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#17 » by gswhoops » Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:07 pm

winforlose wrote:
gswhoops wrote:
winforlose wrote:
There are 3 problems with this. This reply is also for @Shrink

1. There are draft pick penalties for being in the 2nd apron for more than 2 of a 5 year period. We were a 2nd apron team in 24/25. If we go into it in 25/26 then we are either out of it the next three seasons, or taking a poison pill for our pick 7 years out.

2. Roster space is at a premium for this team. We had 15 players, remove Ingles and add Joan and we are back at 15. Even if we let go of Garza we still don’t have a PG and now have an incredible tax bill to add even a minimum PG.

3. NAW log jams the rotation. Clark and TSJ both have great potential but cannot develop stuck behind NAW and DDV. If Dilly takes the backup PG minutes that forces multiple players to share the remaining SG/SF backup minutes. Better to clean the slate and try to get assets out of a sign and trade for NAW.

Are we 100% that Joan is even coming over this year? Might make sense to park him in Europe for a season given the roster and tax constraints the Wolves are operating under.


The Wolves need a backup C. If they don’t bring him then they are gonna have the same problem they had last season. Running it back is a bad idea. Imbalance at the PG and C will cost us in the playoffs again.

Not a slight on Joan as a prospect but most likely whoever you can sign for the vet min is going to give you better NBA minutes next year than he is.
lewdog
Rookie
Posts: 1,162
And1: 94
Joined: Jun 21, 2005

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#18 » by lewdog » Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:07 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
shrink wrote:I would add, the Randle deal doesn’t necessarily mean NAW is gone.

As I explained in another thread, Connelly should outbid t-MLE offers and perhaps pay all the way up to the $14.1 MLE, and worry about payroll later.


I think the Dunc'd on podcast mentioned this back in Late April/Early May.

Basically all of their players (Naz/Randle/NAW) will be tradable on their new contracts. Sign them now, see where the team is in January/Early February. If they are a Top team in the NBA, maybe the owners pay this year like Cleveland and other franchises are doing. If they aren't playing at that level, they can move off of one of the deals.


If this is the Wolves master plan to acquire a starting point guard before the '26 playoffs, then I guess "I'm in". I guess.
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum
ReggiesKnicks
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#19 » by ReggiesKnicks » Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:11 pm

winforlose wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
shrink wrote:I would add, the Randle deal doesn’t necessarily mean NAW is gone.

As I explained in another thread, Connelly should outbid t-MLE offers and perhaps pay all the way up to the $14.1 MLE, and worry about payroll later.


I think the Dunc'd on podcast mentioned this back in Late April/Early May.

Basically all of their players (Naz/Randle/NAW) will be tradable on their new contracts. Sign them now, see where the team is in January/Early February. If they are a Top team in the NBA, maybe the owners pay this year like Cleveland and other franchises are doing. If they aren't playing at that level, they can move off of one of the deals.


There are 3 problems with this. This reply is also for @Shrink

1. There are draft pick penalties for being in the 2nd apron for more than 2 of a 5 year period. We were a 2nd apron team in 24/25. If we go into it in 25/26 then we are either out of it the next three seasons, or taking a poison pill for our pick 7 years out.


This is a rule of the new CBA. It doesn't mean teams should avoid it if they are title contenders.

2. Roster space is at a premium for this team. We had 15 players, remove Ingles and add Joan and we are back at 15. Even if we let go of Garza we still don’t have a PG and now have an incredible tax bill to add even a minimum PG.


Are Dillingham/Donte/Conley not Point Guards?

Even NAW is a PG defensively as a POA defender.

3. NAW log jams the rotation. Clark and TSJ both have great potential but cannot develop stuck behind NAW and DDV. If Dilly takes the backup PG minutes that forces multiple players to share the remaining SG/SF backup minutes. Better to clean the slate and try to get assets out of a sign and trade for NAW.


If you can't develop when stuck behind players of the caliber of NAW/DDV, maybe you aren't a good basketball player.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,836
And1: 6,549
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Shams: Randle 3/100 staying with TWolves 

Post#20 » by gswhoops » Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:14 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
3. NAW log jams the rotation. Clark and TSJ both have great potential but cannot develop stuck behind NAW and DDV. If Dilly takes the backup PG minutes that forces multiple players to share the remaining SG/SF backup minutes. Better to clean the slate and try to get assets out of a sign and trade for NAW.


If you can't develop when stuck behind players of the caliber of NAW/DDV, maybe you aren't a good basketball player.

I mean, they're both solid vets. The bigger problem is that Minnesota is clearly in win-now mode and isn't going to have the ability (or the inclination) to suffer through the growing pains when they have ready-now guys on the roster.

Return to Trades and Transactions