Evil_Headband wrote:sco wrote:
1) First, second and third, should be getting rid of Vuc by any means necessary (not giving up a 1st, Coby, Matas, Giddey, Noa...but everything else should be on the table including buyout). IMO he hurts both performance and development. At least I feel like AK is on board here.
I agree with almost all your points but not this one. Of course, Vucevic isn't very good and isn't a part of the future. However, if there isn't a reasonable trade out there for a center that will be here long-term, I'd rather him stick around. He's not taking any minutes from a player who needs to be developed. He also seems to be a good vet presence who can help the other players. Maybe see what's available at the trade deadline. Worst case, they punt this year on a future center and address things next year when their "financial flexibility" is at its highest.
Here's where I see it differently. IMO, the defensive adjustments necessary to cover up for the worst defensive C in the league hurt our team, not to mention, make our other guys look like worse defenders which lowers their trade value. Add to that the fact that Vuc is only really effective if he is fed the ball constantly as he's not able to generate his own offense...just another guy who can't add value on the court without the ball in his hands. More importantly, I'm looking for Matas to step into a 3rd option role (ideally 2nd, but prob not yet), and that cannot happen with Vuc here.