Image ImageImage Image

Shams: Lonzo for Okoro

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6

User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,312
And1: 37,347
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#441 » by coldfish » Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:37 pm

Guru wrote:
coldfish wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
There is no objective way to say AK did not get fleeced in the Vuc trade. I'm sure you'll concoct some theory to defend it, but everyone who doesn't troll the board with posts like "AK Don't Miss!!!!" knows that trade sucked and severely crippled the franchise.


I read that response and my brain locked up. I can't even put together a response. Its like someone posting that NBA players are short.


It didn't, it started the shift and directly lead to DD and Ball.


There was nothing that happened there that facilitated the team getting Derozan or Ball.

Giving Derozan that huge contract and the Spurs a lottery pick when no one else wanted Derozan above the MLE was also a fleecing.
Ball was an oft injured player who came to the Bulls and played 70 of 410 games. Another bad trade.

Your post is like saying that me getting cancer directly lead to me getting HIV and ALS and trying to portray that like a good thing.
drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,054
And1: 4,194
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#442 » by drosestruts » Sun Jun 29, 2025 11:33 pm

Indomitable wrote:
drosestruts wrote:I don't really get the arguments about the Bulls not trading guys like DeRozan, Caruso, and LaVine at the height of their value.

I don't see people saying the Bucks should trade Giannis, the nuggets should trade Jokic, the Thunder should trade SGA.

I mean if you want top value from SGA, now is the time, hanging onto him any longer is asset mismanagement - it's not going to get better than MVP, Scoring leader, finals MVP, and champ. Now's the time Presti, right????

it's convienint having hindsight and knowing Lonzo's injury will be far more serious that initially diagnosed and that LaVine would himself run into some heath issues.

You named 3 MVP and just All stars. There is a big difference.


DeMar was legitimately in the MVP conversation his first year here. He and Zach were multi-time all stars. We were the #1 seed.

It all went wrong very fast.

But this is my point that the "We should have traded them" takes are revisionist history and would be comparable to stating other teams should trade their best players to maximize their value.

Which some have pointed out - is happening with Giannis.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,201
And1: 9,244
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#443 » by Jcool0 » Mon Jun 30, 2025 2:27 am

Read on Twitter
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,117
And1: 11,802
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#444 » by WindyCityBorn » Mon Jun 30, 2025 2:51 am

Does this mean we keep Tre Jones now? I hope so.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,117
And1: 11,802
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#445 » by WindyCityBorn » Mon Jun 30, 2025 2:53 am

Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Player A makes $11 million per with only 2 years left.

Player B makes $18 million per with 4 years left.

We just need find a sucker team to take player B off of our roster.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,598
And1: 9,144
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#446 » by Dez » Mon Jun 30, 2025 3:12 am

Guru wrote:
coldfish wrote:I actually think that Okuro at 2 years $21m is a pretty good gamble.

The issue, as always with AKME, is that he appeared to get fleeced in this trade. Lonzo had more trade value than Okoru yet here we are. If this trade was Okuro + 2 2nds for Ball, I think people would feel better about it.

First stab at a rotation:
Giddey / Ayo
Coby / Huerter
Okuro
Matas / Patrick
Vucevic / Collins

There is your 9 man rotation. I don't see Noa, Terry, Carter, Smith, etc. getting anything more than spot minutes.


I cant name one trade he got fleeced in. People just want the hope that comes with draft picks


At this point you have to be doing this for laughs? There is not one person on the planet that can honestly say that AKME didn't get bent over in the Vuc trade, even he would admit he got reamed.

You cannot actually believe the stuff you post, there is no way.
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,420
And1: 4,613
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#447 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Mon Jun 30, 2025 3:35 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Player A makes $11 million per with only 2 years left.

Player B makes $18 million per with 4 years left.

We just need find a sucker team to take player B off of our roster.


I wish player B had the intensity and aggressiveness of Tony Snell
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,283
And1: 9,003
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#448 » by Dan Z » Mon Jun 30, 2025 4:26 am

drosestruts wrote:
Indomitable wrote:
drosestruts wrote:I don't really get the arguments about the Bulls not trading guys like DeRozan, Caruso, and LaVine at the height of their value.

I don't see people saying the Bucks should trade Giannis, the nuggets should trade Jokic, the Thunder should trade SGA.

I mean if you want top value from SGA, now is the time, hanging onto him any longer is asset mismanagement - it's not going to get better than MVP, Scoring leader, finals MVP, and champ. Now's the time Presti, right????

it's convienint having hindsight and knowing Lonzo's injury will be far more serious that initially diagnosed and that LaVine would himself run into some heath issues.

You named 3 MVP and just All stars. There is a big difference.


DeMar was legitimately in the MVP conversation his first year here. He and Zach were multi-time all stars. We were the #1 seed.

It all went wrong very fast.

But this is my point that the "We should have traded them" takes are revisionist history and would be comparable to stating other teams should trade their best players to maximize their value.

Which some have pointed out - is happening with Giannis.


DDR hit a few game winners and overall had a good season, but he was never seriously going to be MVP. The team was good for 3 months and then fell off after Lonzo got hurt. They ended up in 6th place and the Bucks easily beat them in the playoffs.

I could see AK waiting a half a season to evaluate things and maybe even a full season, but at that point it was obvious that Lonzo wasn't going to come back for awhile (if at all) and that version of the team was going nowhere.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,117
And1: 11,802
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#449 » by WindyCityBorn » Mon Jun 30, 2025 4:29 am

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Player A makes $11 million per with only 2 years left.

Player B makes $18 million per with 4 years left.

We just need find a sucker team to take player B off of our roster.


I wish player B had the intensity and aggressiveness of Tony Snell


I’m not even mad or upset with Pat. AKME knew who he was before he got his payday. His personality was not suddenly gonna change because he got paid.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,283
And1: 9,003
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#450 » by Dan Z » Mon Jun 30, 2025 4:39 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Player A makes $11 million per with only 2 years left.

Player B makes $18 million per with 4 years left.

We just need find a sucker team to take player B off of our roster.


It's an interested comparison. The big difference is that Okoro is trending upward while PW just had his worst season.

I looked up their stats and for his career PW is .392 from three (3.1 attempts per game). Okoro is .351 (2.7 attempts per game). I'm not sure if I trust that Okoros three point percentage will stay the same or go up if he gets more attempts.

Another difference is that Okoro is a SG or SF. PW is SF or PF.

I'm not sure if the Bulls needed another SF, but he should improve the team to some degree.
eierluke
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,236
And1: 135
Joined: Jul 09, 2001

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#451 » by eierluke » Mon Jun 30, 2025 4:50 am

Is this trade (SF in, PG out) another indication that bulls management has in mind to resign Tre Jones?
sven petersson
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,201
And1: 9,244
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#452 » by Jcool0 » Mon Jun 30, 2025 4:55 am

Dan Z wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Player A makes $11 million per with only 2 years left.

Player B makes $18 million per with 4 years left.

We just need find a sucker team to take player B off of our roster.


It's an interested comparison. The big difference is that Okoro is trending upward while PW just had his worst season.

I looked up their stats and for his career PW is .392 from three (3.1 attempts per game). Okoro is .351 (2.7 attempts per game). I'm not sure if I trust that Okoros three point percentage will stay the same or go up if he gets more attempts.

Another difference is that Okoro is a SG or SF. PW is SF or PF.

I'm not sure if the Bulls needed another SF, but he should improve the team to some degree.


Is Okoro trending upward?

23-24: 9.4 ppg on 49/39/67 in 27 MPG

24-25: 6.1 ppg on 46/37/72 in 19 MPG
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,283
And1: 9,003
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#453 » by Dan Z » Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:20 am

Jcool0 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Player A makes $11 million per with only 2 years left.

Player B makes $18 million per with 4 years left.

We just need find a sucker team to take player B off of our roster.


It's an interested comparison. The big difference is that Okoro is trending upward while PW just had his worst season.

I looked up their stats and for his career PW is .392 from three (3.1 attempts per game). Okoro is .351 (2.7 attempts per game). I'm not sure if I trust that Okoros three point percentage will stay the same or go up if he gets more attempts.

Another difference is that Okoro is a SG or SF. PW is SF or PF.

I'm not sure if the Bulls needed another SF, but he should improve the team to some degree.


Is Okoro trending upward?

23-24: 9.4 ppg on 49/39/67 in 27 MPG

24-25: 6.1 ppg on 46/37/72 in 19 MPG


You're right...statistically he was better last year. Yikes! If AK basically just traded for another PW then what is he doing?

My guess is that he thinks Okoro has potential and will play better with a change of scenery...?
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,681
And1: 6,712
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#454 » by PaKii94 » Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:41 am

Dan Z wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
It's an interested comparison. The big difference is that Okoro is trending upward while PW just had his worst season.

I looked up their stats and for his career PW is .392 from three (3.1 attempts per game). Okoro is .351 (2.7 attempts per game). I'm not sure if I trust that Okoros three point percentage will stay the same or go up if he gets more attempts.

Another difference is that Okoro is a SG or SF. PW is SF or PF.

I'm not sure if the Bulls needed another SF, but he should improve the team to some degree.


Is Okoro trending upward?

23-24: 9.4 ppg on 49/39/67 in 27 MPG

24-25: 6.1 ppg on 46/37/72 in 19 MPG


You're right...statistically he was better last year. Yikes! If AK basically just traded for another PW then what is he doing?

My guess is that he thinks Okoro has potential and will play better with a change of scenery...?


Shame on gotlieb for making such an amateur comparison.

Last 3 yrs-
Okoro vs pwill
Net rtg: +9 vs -10
TS%: 60 vs 55
Ws/48: .114 vs .048
Ftr: .26 vs .16

Wasn't the biggest fan of okoro during the draft and not the biggest fan RN but he's still much better player than pwill and it's insulting to compare him to pwill. At 11/yr he's a really good gamble. That's low end roleplayer money. He'll easily provide that. The bonus comes if his shot comes around and the change of scenery mature him into a vet. He's already providing impact with poor offense. If it comes around a little bit he'll be a value contact

Also love lonzo but he's done as a reliable piece and was getting redundant with the guards we have.

I think okoro starts with giddey/coby and then tre Jones/ayo off the bench
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,283
And1: 9,003
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#455 » by Dan Z » Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:49 am

PaKii94 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Is Okoro trending upward?

23-24: 9.4 ppg on 49/39/67 in 27 MPG

24-25: 6.1 ppg on 46/37/72 in 19 MPG


You're right...statistically he was better last year. Yikes! If AK basically just traded for another PW then what is he doing?

My guess is that he thinks Okoro has potential and will play better with a change of scenery...?


Shame on gotlieb for making such an amateur comparison.

Last 3 yrs-
Okoro vs pwill
Net rtg: +9 vs -10
TS%: 60 vs 55
Ws/48: .114 vs .048
Ftr: .26 vs .16

Wasn't the biggest fan of okoro during the draft and not the biggest fan RN but he's still much better player than pwill and it's insulting to compare him to pwill. At 11/yr he's a really good gamble. That's low end roleplayer money. He'll easily provide that. The bonus comes if his shot comes around and the change of scenery mature him into a vet. He's already providing impact with poor offense. If it comes around a little bit he'll be a value contact

Also love lonzo but he's done as a reliable piece and was getting redundant with the guards we have.

I think okoro starts with giddey/coby and then tre Jones/ayo off the bench


How much are those stats related to Okoro being on the better team?

I'm not saying he's as good as PW, I don't think he is, but wanted to ask the question.

I'm not crazy about the trade because it's a minor improvement for a team that needs to think bigger, but overall it's fine. It didn't cost much and he's not an expensive player. However, if the Memphis deal was really there last year for Lonzo then that's what AK should've done.
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,681
And1: 6,712
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#456 » by PaKii94 » Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:55 am

Dan Z wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
You're right...statistically he was better last year. Yikes! If AK basically just traded for another PW then what is he doing?

My guess is that he thinks Okoro has potential and will play better with a change of scenery...?


Shame on gotlieb for making such an amateur comparison.

Last 3 yrs-
Okoro vs pwill
Net rtg: +9 vs -10
TS%: 60 vs 55
Ws/48: .114 vs .048
Ftr: .26 vs .16

Wasn't the biggest fan of okoro during the draft and not the biggest fan RN but he's still much better player than pwill and it's insulting to compare him to pwill. At 11/yr he's a really good gamble. That's low end roleplayer money. He'll easily provide that. The bonus comes if his shot comes around and the change of scenery mature him into a vet. He's already providing impact with poor offense. If it comes around a little bit he'll be a value contact

Also love lonzo but he's done as a reliable piece and was getting redundant with the guards we have.

I think okoro starts with giddey/coby and then tre Jones/ayo off the bench


How much are those stats related to Okoro being on the better team?

I'm not saying he's as good as PW, I don't think he is, but wanted to ask the question.

I'm not crazy about the trade because it's a minor improvement for a team that needs to think bigger, but overall it's fine. It didn't cost much and he's not an expensive player. However, if the Memphis deal was really there last year for Lonzo then that's what AK should've done.


Imo a lot of these stats transfer regardless of the team. Maybe a small bump from playing on a good team and small negative from a bad team but the impact shows out. Also the difference between pwill And okoro is still to big to only be accounted for by team success

I like ntrg and ws/48 for quick looks.
WesPeace
Senior
Posts: 657
And1: 297
Joined: Jan 12, 2025
Location: Planet Earth
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#457 » by WesPeace » Mon Jun 30, 2025 7:19 am

If PWill had Okoro's energy, hustle and passion for the basketball he would be legit good player.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,219
And1: 6,324
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#458 » by Indomitable » Mon Jun 30, 2025 9:13 am

drosestruts wrote:
Indomitable wrote:
drosestruts wrote:I don't really get the arguments about the Bulls not trading guys like DeRozan, Caruso, and LaVine at the height of their value.

I don't see people saying the Bucks should trade Giannis, the nuggets should trade Jokic, the Thunder should trade SGA.

I mean if you want top value from SGA, now is the time, hanging onto him any longer is asset mismanagement - it's not going to get better than MVP, Scoring leader, finals MVP, and champ. Now's the time Presti, right????

it's convienint having hindsight and knowing Lonzo's injury will be far more serious that initially diagnosed and that LaVine would himself run into some heath issues.

You named 3 MVP and just All stars. There is a big difference.


DeMar was legitimately in the MVP conversation his first year here. He and Zach were multi-time all stars. We were the #1 seed.

It all went wrong very fast.

But this is my point that the "We should have traded them" takes are revisionist history and would be comparable to stating other teams should trade their best players to maximize their value.

Which some have pointed out - is happening with Giannis.

If you think Derozan is anywhere near Giannis we are done discussing it.
:banghead:
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,202
And1: 18,438
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#459 » by dougthonus » Mon Jun 30, 2025 11:33 am

drosestruts wrote:I don't really get the arguments about the Bulls not trading guys like DeRozan, Caruso, and LaVine at the height of their value.


I guess it depends, as someone who DID recommend those trades in reality in the summer following their good year, I think the arguments were easy:

1: DeMar's year was a fluke of game winners unlikely to repeat, our year was a fluke unlikely to repeat, and we have a tiny window to get out of this short term mess with extremely low upside for winning and still execute a rebuild.

2: Zach was viewed as a bad contract by half this forum the day we signed him to the extension

3: Caruso is the most obvious one of the group, because his value actually held up all the way to last summer, and whether you like Giddey or not, we did actually trade him for reasonable value.

I don't see people saying the Bucks should trade Giannis, the nuggets should trade Jokic, the Thunder should trade SGA.


Clearly none of our guys are even remotely approaching that level, and that was incredibly obvious. This would be more like the Wizards trading Beal.

I mean if you want top value from SGA, now is the time, hanging onto him any longer is asset mismanagement - it's not going to get better than MVP, Scoring leader, finals MVP, and champ. Now's the time Presti, right????


You either get on court value or future value, when your ceiling is 1st round exit team, and you have no future assets, and you have no future salary room, and your guys are over 30 you aim for future value.

it's convienint having hindsight and knowing Lonzo's injury will be far more serious that initially diagnosed and that LaVine would himself run into some heath issues.


Definitely it was tricky to know Lonzo's injury. I won't say impossible, when the off-season started he was already way behind on his recovery, so signs were there, but to assume it was two more years would have been a big stretch, to assume this is a big risk? I think that was pretty reasonable though.

That said, you didn't need to know Lonzo's injury to know that you should have traded Vuc + DDR that summer based on their age, the absolute total flukeness of DDR's season and Vuc's already obvious decline, and the general unsustainability of this team. Those were the two I pushed for explicitly at that time (probably the peak value we could have gotten for either).

If you wanted to take a crack at it around Caruso + Lonzo + LaVine before realizing how bad Lonzo's injury was, I think that was reasonable, but watching this team, even in their wins, you knew it was fool's gold. I pushed for trading LaVine the next deadline when maybe we didn't have peak value of him, but we reportedly had offers for two firsts.

I did several episodes of my podcast where I said you could probably flip DDR + Zach + Caruso + Vuc into 6-8 1st round picks and we would absolutely look back at passing on this with massive regret because we wouldn't make another playoffs and would be staring at a rebuild without assets. That's literally exactly what happened, and it wasn't all that hard to see in advance.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,201
And1: 9,244
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Shams: Lonzo for Okoro 

Post#460 » by Jcool0 » Mon Jun 30, 2025 12:07 pm

Dan Z wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
It's an interested comparison. The big difference is that Okoro is trending upward while PW just had his worst season.

I looked up their stats and for his career PW is .392 from three (3.1 attempts per game). Okoro is .351 (2.7 attempts per game). I'm not sure if I trust that Okoros three point percentage will stay the same or go up if he gets more attempts.

Another difference is that Okoro is a SG or SF. PW is SF or PF.

I'm not sure if the Bulls needed another SF, but he should improve the team to some degree.


Is Okoro trending upward?

23-24: 9.4 ppg on 49/39/67 in 27 MPG

24-25: 6.1 ppg on 46/37/72 in 19 MPG


You're right...statistically he was better last year. Yikes! If AK basically just traded for another PW then what is he doing?

My guess is that he thinks Okoro has potential and will play better with a change of scenery...?


AK is thinking he gets a guy who was a top 5 pick aka high talent (in theory) player for next to nothing (Ball probably plays 40+ games next year) and if he hits great and if not its only two years at 11M per. He would rather do it this way then accumulate draft assets, since again in theory less risk involved.

Return to Chicago Bulls