Larry_Russell wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Where is LeBore going?
Dallas has already been mentioned...
he will go to whoever is the most favored to win a title.
Going? Without his son? Nowhere.
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971

Larry_Russell wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Where is LeBore going?
Dallas has already been mentioned...
he will go to whoever is the most favored to win a title.

aim2please wrote:WeLikeOurGuys wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Because you'll have a center
Right now our starting center is Queta. We are so cooked if he's our starter. Like just trade Derrick and Jaylen and tank at that point
I could see your point if the centers were actually good — but they’re mediocre at best. Honestly, I’d rather roll with Neemias Queta for a full season than pay Luke Kornet $13 million a year and give up Simons in the process.
Losing a young scorer with upside to overpay Al and Luke makes no sense.
Simons, Sexton, Clarkson, Ivey, Scoot Henderson, Poole, Cam Thomas... What do these guys have in common? Their value comes from high volume scoring. They are all bad to terrible defenders that do very little when they're not scoring. Empty stats guys. They're never feature on a good team.
Least valuable archetype in the league. These guys have almost no trade value around the league yet some people think moving Simons is a sin. If they keep him it's because there are no takers. You'd think that fans of a great team would figure out what impacts winning by now.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
cl2117 wrote:Nurkic could be an option, especially if we're losing both Kornet and Horford.
Nurkic for Simons shaves off $7m and then if you dump Niang for close to nothing we could even try to find a distressed asset of our own to flip (2025's Jaden Springer). Can probably get it all done for 2nds.
Then if there's a raft of big-man injuries maybe we can flip Nurk to a third team and get expirings/2nds back to recoup some of the cost of dumping Simons/Niang.
fallguy wrote:I think the real problem we're faced with (as we spin and argue about centers and Simons) is that our three best players really preclude us from building a proper team, given their salaries, and the fact that none of them are proper bigs.
Tatum - $58.5M
Brown - $57.1M
White - $30.3M
We're at $145M in 26-27 and jump up to the $157M range in 27-28.
Can you fill out a championship roster with these three as your core?
Look at the salaries for guys like Hartenstein (just to pick an example). A proper center runs you $25M+. And neither Luke nor Al is the longterm answer.
It seems blindingly obvious to me that we cannot keep JT, JB, DW and also add Simons beyond next year (at an absolute minimum of $18M). There's no way you can invest that much in perimeter players.
Which is why I think Simons is toast.
The only exception to that would be if we spin off one of JB or DW for a haul, including a young(ish) big we can slot into the starting lineup for under market salary.
I'm increasingly convinced this is the path, eventually. Whether we like it or not.
Larry_Russell wrote:Simons to Bulls for Coby White and Jalen Smith?
cloverleaf wrote:fallguy wrote:I think the real problem we're faced with (as we spin and argue about centers and Simons) is that our three best players really preclude us from building a proper team, given their salaries, and the fact that none of them are proper bigs.
Tatum - $58.5M
Brown - $57.1M
White - $30.3M
We're at $145M in 26-27 and jump up to the $157M range in 27-28.
Can you fill out a championship roster with these three as your core?
Look at the salaries for guys like Hartenstein (just to pick an example). A proper center runs you $25M+. And neither Luke nor Al is the longterm answer.
It seems blindingly obvious to me that we cannot keep JT, JB, DW and also add Simons beyond next year (at an absolute minimum of $18M). There's no way you can invest that much in perimeter players.
Which is why I think Simons is toast.
The only exception to that would be if we spin off one of JB or DW for a haul, including a young(ish) big we can slot into the starting lineup for under market salary.
I'm increasingly convinced this is the path, eventually. Whether we like it or not.
White's not so much the issue...
Larry_Russell wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:WeLikeOurGuys wrote:If you're trading Simons just to bring back Al and Luke, then what's the actual plan? I love Horford — he's probably one of my favorite Celtics ever — and Luke is a great teammate and a dependable backup big. But given where the Celtics are right now, is bringing back two aging role players at the expense of a young, high-upside scorer really the right move?
Essentially, we’d be running it back without Jrue and KP. That might be fine if Horford or Kornet had any real upside left, but they don’t — they're solid, not game-changers. So what's the long-term value here?
It all depends on what you can get for Simons. But if they end up flipping him in a pure salary dump just to re-sign Luke and Al, I’ll be really disappointed.
Because you'll have a center
Right now our starting center is Queta. We are so cooked if he's our starter. Like just trade Derrick and Jaylen and tank at that point
Cooked WITH Kornet.
Fierce1 wrote:cloverleaf wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Just trade Hauser and use that money to sign Luke.
Niang and Baylor are enough shooters.
Luke's gonna take more than $3M a year. (The Nets are unlikely to help here.)
Love Luke, but he's not a starting NBA Center.
So if Luke asks for more than 8m per year, let him walk.
cloverleaf wrote:cl2117 wrote:Nurkic could be an option, especially if we're losing both Kornet and Horford.
Nurkic for Simons shaves off $7m and then if you dump Niang for close to nothing we could even try to find a distressed asset of our own to flip (2025's Jaden Springer). Can probably get it all done for 2nds.
Then if there's a raft of big-man injuries maybe we can flip Nurk to a third team and get expirings/2nds back to recoup some of the cost of dumping Simons/Niang.
https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/news/grade-the-trade-hornets-flip-jusuf-nurki-for-jazz-guard-collin-sexton
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
klemen44 wrote:Boston an keep all 3 of jb, jt and white because Prichard has cobtract for only 7-8 million for next 3 years.
You flip Simmons and picks if necesary for a center... That is the way to go.
You can affird 25million center as long as you have Prichard as starting point guard for 8 million.
chrisab123 wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Simons to Bulls for Coby White and Jalen Smith?
Can’t see the Bulls doing that but it would make sense
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
Fierce1 wrote:Still talking JB trade?
cl2117 wrote:chrisab123 wrote:Larry_Russell wrote:Simons to Bulls for Coby White and Jalen Smith?
Can’t see the Bulls doing that but it would make sense
Vuc would be the better target. They've got Zach Collins and Jalen Smith, Vuc is 35 and not part of their future he's only temporarily propping them up. Simons makes more sense for their timeline.
They also have a big TPE and could eat Niang or Hauser and still be WAY under the tax.
Possibly Patrick Williams' long-term money instead of Vuc if they're looking to get off that train at the earliest station possible. $18m per year is ugly for Pat Will but it's flat each year so at least it gets slightly better. He seems like a classic reclamation project that likely won't work out but I can talk myself into it if they take Niang as well we're out of the tax this year.
Fierce1 wrote:Just trade Hauser and use that money to sign Luke.
Niang and Baylor are enough shooters.
Fierce1 wrote:Maybe Amari Williams will be better than Queta.
Celtics have until February deadline to get a Center.
It does not need to be right now.