Michael Bradley wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:None of those sentences are true at all and it’s really not all that necessary to revise history in order to trash Shapiro.
It was reported at the time that the Jays were looking at Shapiro, Dan Duquette and Ken Williams for the position and Shapiro was the most respected of that group at that time (and certainly considered the most analytically inclined).
Here is the initial reaction to Shapiro being brought up (the first thing you’ll notice is the overwhelming praise for the idea from this fanbase, the next thing you’ll notice is my prediction that AA would not be down with him): viewtopic.php?f=123&t=1404510
All of those sentences are true. Shapiro led a team in the pathetic AL Central to over a decade of mediocrity before we "poached" him. He was always a **** baseball executives. Being analytically-inclined means **** all if you aren't getting results.
His mediocre resume predictably translated to a decade of mediocrity in Toronto.
It's okay to criticize Masai for being bad the last four years because he objectively was, but Shapiro has spent most of his twenty-five year career mismanaging sports teams.
Shapiro inherited an old team with a one year window and no prospects in the upper minors (Vlad was 16 years old) and yet if the Jays make the playoffs this season (currently holding a spot) then they would have been a playoff team in half of Shapiro's time here. In baseball, that's not a mediocre run. Are they a mediocre front office? That's a more reasonable take, but results-wise, that hasn't been the case.
You have a TOP FIVE PAYROLL... you SHOULD BE in the playoffs 80 percent or better..