red_power wrote:DusterBuster wrote:getting literally nothing for DA when even Charlotte was able to trade Nurk is absolutely mind **** -ly brain melting levels of insanity.
I don't think anyone would give up anything meaningful to get Ayton in the current circumstances. After his failed stint with Blazers I bet his value as a core player is close to zero.. A stronger team would obviously be willing to get him as a role player, but $35 mln paycheck is a bit too much for that role.DusterBuster wrote:If this team isn’t going to compete for a playoff spot, then what the **** was the Holiday trade for?
I actually believe dumping Ayton is a good addition by subtraction to make this team more competitive. I mean he's a chucker who treats basketball with zero effort and yet has a former #1 pick ego. I don't think his presence on the roster was really helpful for the team's performance.
Quote 1: my point from the Nurk example is that even players with no trade “value” can be traded. I’m a firm believer that getting something is better than getting nothing. Buying out Ayton is getting nothing. You don’t get draft assets. You don’t get roster depth. You don’t get future trade assets. You get… nothing.
Quote 2: sure, I’ll let you have your addition by subtraction argument. I happen to somewhat agree (tho still believe you should get SOMETHING back). I also will push back on him not being a positive influence on the roster for wins. When the team went 9/10 and tanked their top 7 lottery hopes, it coincided with DAs best stretch of play ever as a Blazer. He was unquestionably their best player in that stretch and what I had assumed gave them their ill-fated “hope” that this roster was even halfway decent. So the hope they got made them confident enough to trade for an expensive 36yo vet and pass on top end talent in order to reach for a high-risk/high-reward prospect over more clear cut talent in a draft…
I don’t disagree with what you’re expressing, but I’m just frustrated in any lack of a plan here.