Dominator83 wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:Hoping for Vooch and P Will trades …
In the words of Metallica: Waiting for the day that never comes
Hoping
Not waiting my friend
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
Dominator83 wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:Hoping for Vooch and P Will trades …
In the words of Metallica: Waiting for the day that never comes
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Warriors lost Looney, Bucks lost Lopez, Hornets lost Williams and Nurkic, Hawks lost Capela. Vucevic deal may not be as dead as people think if we just wait a minute.
If Vuc’s market sputters, I’d kick the tires on moving Jalen Smith for an asset instead. It’s AK, so obviously lol, but that feels like a sensible pivot.

Infinity2152 wrote:AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Warriors lost Looney, Bucks lost Lopez, Hornets lost Williams and Nurkic, Hawks lost Capela. Vucevic deal may not be as dead as people think if we just wait a minute.
If Vuc’s market sputters, I’d kick the tires on moving Jalen Smith for an asset instead. It’s AK, so obviously lol, but that feels like a sensible pivot.
Would hate if it came to that, but I agree. Would also really hate letting Vucevic and Collins both expire and getting nothing back though.

Dominator83 wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:Hoping for Vooch and P Will trades …
In the words of Metallica: Waiting for the day that never comes
Infinity2152 wrote:AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Warriors lost Looney, Bucks lost Lopez, Hornets lost Williams and Nurkic, Hawks lost Capela. Vucevic deal may not be as dead as people think if we just wait a minute.
If Vuc’s market sputters, I’d kick the tires on moving Jalen Smith for an asset instead. It’s AK, so obviously lol, but that feels like a sensible pivot.
Would hate if it came to that, but I agree. Would also really hate letting Vucevic and Collins both expire and getting nothing back though.

NecessaryEvil wrote:

Muzbar wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:
Coby for Mathurin?
Peelboy wrote:Muzbar wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:
Coby for Mathurin?
That’s an AK move, one for one. More proven for younger with some limitations. I actually like Mathurin, but any other GM would say Coby for Benedict+1-2FRPs. AK will do a straight swap after rejecting Coby for multiple FRP deals.

Muzbar wrote:Peelboy wrote:Muzbar wrote:Coby for Mathurin?
That’s an AK move, one for one. More proven for younger with some limitations. I actually like Mathurin, but any other GM would say Coby for Benedict+1-2FRPs. AK will do a straight swap after rejecting Coby for multiple FRP deals.
It's 100% an AK move.
Trade proven player for younger player in final year of rookie contract.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
MissileMike wrote:Muzbar wrote:Peelboy wrote:That’s an AK move, one for one. More proven for younger with some limitations. I actually like Mathurin, but any other GM would say Coby for Benedict+1-2FRPs. AK will do a straight swap after rejecting Coby for multiple FRP deals.
It's 100% an AK move.
Trade proven player for younger player in final year of rookie contract.
Except, in this case, the proven player is in the final year of his contract and will become an unrestricted free agent. So Coby is a rental.

MissileMike wrote:Muzbar wrote:Peelboy wrote:That’s an AK move, one for one. More proven for younger with some limitations. I actually like Mathurin, but any other GM would say Coby for Benedict+1-2FRPs. AK will do a straight swap after rejecting Coby for multiple FRP deals.
It's 100% an AK move.
Trade proven player for younger player in final year of rookie contract.
Except, in this case, the proven player is in the final year of his contract and will become an unrestricted free agent. So Coby is a rental.

nomorezorro wrote:mathurin for coby doesn't even make sense as an upside play. sure, mathurin is a couple of years younger, but that's offset by the fact that he's, yknow, worse. coby's post-deadline run might be a mirage, but it was fringe all star level. i'd take a 25 year old who did that over a 23 year old who's capable of putting together a great game every now and then.
it also doesn't work as a "spin a guy off for assets before his contract is up" move because mathurin also has to get paid after this year
burlydee wrote:nomorezorro wrote:mathurin for coby doesn't even make sense as an upside play. sure, mathurin is a couple of years younger, but that's offset by the fact that he's, yknow, worse. coby's post-deadline run might be a mirage, but it was fringe all star level. i'd take a 25 year old who did that over a 23 year old who's capable of putting together a great game every now and then.
it also doesn't work as a "spin a guy off for assets before his contract is up" move because mathurin also has to get paid after this year
You guys are getting mad about a fake trade. Lmao.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.