LoveMyRaps wrote:?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw
We’re the only team in the league that hasn’t done a damn thing. lol
Masai being gone really put a stop to everything for them for the time being.
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
LoveMyRaps wrote:?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw
We’re the only team in the league that hasn’t done a damn thing. lol
Son Goku 25 wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw
We’re the only team in the league that hasn’t done a damn thing. lol
Masai being gone really put a stop to everything for them for the time being.
Clutch0z24 wrote:PushDaRock wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:
Yeah just i don't think the addition of Ingram/rookie CMB is enough to add to make the current team we have take a big step next year....We will be better no doubt....But i don't see 20+ wins better....Maybe 10 or 11 if all things go well and that would put us at around +500 team and either a play in or 8th seed....
We need a good addition to the team to be in the mix with the teams 1-6 in the East next year IMO.
If we have reasonable health and are only 10 wins better, things likely went pretty bad and the future outlook isn't good at all. This was a 30 win team while intentionally losing games for the last 1/4 of the season and getting decimated by injuries through the first half of the year while playing the toughest schedule in the league. If we had reasonable health and tried to win all our games even without Ingram, we probably would have been in the mid to high 30's in wins. 40 wins would basically be little if any improvement over that and pretty disappointing.
Ingram is good but idk if he and CMB alone would make us a 15-20+ More win team....Also got to factor in at the end of the year there were about 10-13 teams litearlly all tanking as well for Flagg....So them wins we racked up against them other teams also tanking means really nothing....
Imo could go either way and i won't be shocked....If we are in the lottery next year again because of bad luck/injuries i won't be shocked, If we are the 6th seed i won't be shocked...
HumbleRen wrote:?s=46
Polar bear sighting.
Knicks really bent us over on that OG trade.
Clutch0z24 wrote:Losing Masai, Not being able to upgrade the roster in any sort of way....While teams in our conference are improving each passing day.....Makes it hard to get excited about next season....It will be fun to see how CMB does and Ingram addition...But i don't think it will translate to our record being drastically better ....We will see if we get anything in a trade...
For us to leapfrog some of these teams in the East i think we would need to get a impact player on a decent trade. Like a Sabonis level guy without trading much out.
Scase wrote:HumbleRen wrote:?s=46
Polar bear sighting.
Knicks really bent us over on that OG trade.
This should be a video with the sesame street "One of these things is not like the other" playing in the back ground.
Thank god we're capped out all the time with zero flexibility, that's what smart and successful teams do. I wonder how long it will take the people endlessly defending every single time Masai farted, to finally start realizing the **** show he's put us in the last few years. Who am I kidding, they are already trying to pin it all on MLSE forcing him to make win now movesClutch0z24 wrote:Losing Masai, Not being able to upgrade the roster in any sort of way....While teams in our conference are improving each passing day.....Makes it hard to get excited about next season....It will be fun to see how CMB does and Ingram addition...But i don't think it will translate to our record being drastically better ....We will see if we get anything in a trade...
For us to leapfrog some of these teams in the East i think we would need to get a impact player on a decent trade. Like a Sabonis level guy without trading much out.
Ok but, Masai was the reason we aren't able to upgrade the roster in any sort of way. I'm so confused how people can pine for losing Masai, and have issues with the mess of a roster/cap sheet, in the same breath.
One or the other my friend, it makes no sense to have issues with both. We didn't get into this situation by accident, this was all by design. This is what happens when you don't change with the times, it's why our roster is devoid of shooting and we keep trying to zig when everyone else is zagging. It doesn't make you a maverick, it makes you an idiot who thinks they are smarter than overarching trends.
Practically every move since the chip has been a bad one, it's impressive really.
Thaddy wrote:Scase wrote:HumbleRen wrote:?s=46
Polar bear sighting.
Knicks really bent us over on that OG trade.
This should be a video with the sesame street "One of these things is not like the other" playing in the back ground.
Thank god we're capped out all the time with zero flexibility, that's what smart and successful teams do. I wonder how long it will take the people endlessly defending every single time Masai farted, to finally start realizing the **** show he's put us in the last few years. Who am I kidding, they are already trying to pin it all on MLSE forcing him to make win now movesClutch0z24 wrote:Losing Masai, Not being able to upgrade the roster in any sort of way....While teams in our conference are improving each passing day.....Makes it hard to get excited about next season....It will be fun to see how CMB does and Ingram addition...But i don't think it will translate to our record being drastically better ....We will see if we get anything in a trade...
For us to leapfrog some of these teams in the East i think we would need to get a impact player on a decent trade. Like a Sabonis level guy without trading much out.
Ok but, Masai was the reason we aren't able to upgrade the roster in any sort of way. I'm so confused how people can pine for losing Masai, and have issues with the mess of a roster/cap sheet, in the same breath.
One or the other my friend, it makes no sense to have issues with both. We didn't get into this situation by accident, this was all by design. This is what happens when you don't change with the times, it's why our roster is devoid of shooting and we keep trying to zig when everyone else is zagging. It doesn't make you a maverick, it makes you an idiot who thinks they are smarter than overarching trends.
Practically every move since the chip has been a bad one, it's impressive really.
What's the alternative to being capped out? Having cap space and not being able to sign anyone? Signing free agents to overpriced deals like we gave IQ?
They aren't zigging or sagging. They're taking calculated risks. IQ should break out, he was hidden behind Brunson. Ingram is a former all star and still in his prime years. Then we have several high potential prospects that have shown some promise.
It could be much worse than it currently is.
PushDaRock wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:djsunyc wrote:
every season, many teams expected to be better on paper end up falling short for a variety of reasons. there are also teams that surprise and have a good season then drop back down the following year.
we are 4 months away from next season. let's see how it plays out.
Yeah just i don't think the addition of Ingram/rookie CMB is enough to add to make the current team we have take a big step next year....We will be better no doubt....But i don't see 20+ wins better....Maybe 10 or 11 if all things go well and that would put us at around +500 team and either a play in or 8th seed....
We need a good addition to the team to be in the mix with the teams 1-6 in the East next year IMO.
If we have reasonable health and are only 10 wins better, things likely went pretty bad and the future outlook isn't good at all. This was a 30 win team while intentionally losing games for the last 1/4 of the season and getting decimated by injuries through the first half of the year while playing the toughest schedule in the league. If we had reasonable health and tried to win all our games even without Ingram, we probably would have been in the mid to high 30's in wins. 40 wins would basically be little if any improvement over that and pretty disappointing.
HumbleRen wrote:IQ would have not gotten more than 25M a year in this current cap climate btw.
Crazy how much a difference a year makes once all of the teams realize the severity of the new CBA.
Pointgod wrote:Los_29 wrote:RJ’s contract expires at the end of the 26/27 season. That’s not a bad contract to take on.
Teams aren’t taking on extra years unless it’s a significant upgrade or they’re incentivized to do so. The apron rules and CBA is too restrictive. Portland decided to cut Ayton because they couldn't find a trade where anyone was willing to give up expiring contracts even though Ayton himself is expiring.
Tripod wrote:PushDaRock wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:
Yeah just i don't think the addition of Ingram/rookie CMB is enough to add to make the current team we have take a big step next year....We will be better no doubt....But i don't see 20+ wins better....Maybe 10 or 11 if all things go well and that would put us at around +500 team and either a play in or 8th seed....
We need a good addition to the team to be in the mix with the teams 1-6 in the East next year IMO.
If we have reasonable health and are only 10 wins better, things likely went pretty bad and the future outlook isn't good at all. This was a 30 win team while intentionally losing games for the last 1/4 of the season and getting decimated by injuries through the first half of the year while playing the toughest schedule in the league. If we had reasonable health and tried to win all our games even without Ingram, we probably would have been in the mid to high 30's in wins. 40 wins would basically be little if any improvement over that and pretty disappointing.
Yup.
I am expecting 45+ wins next year IF we add a reliable backup C. Anything less will be a disappointment
no, this is just excuse making for mistakes.Kingsway_fan wrote:HumbleRen wrote:IQ would have not gotten more than 25M a year in this current cap climate btw.
Crazy how much a difference a year makes once all of the teams realize the severity of the new CBA.
Doesn't change the Raptors cost of acquisition. Think of it as a canadian tax. Cost of doing business in Toronto.
While Other US teams MAY have paid less, that does not mean that we [Toronto Raptors] are equal. We need to pay a PREMIUM, all things being equal.
Clutch0z24 wrote:DG88 wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:
Yep imo it would take a perfect season with good health from all our guys for us to get 6th...I think Cavs/Knicks/Magic/Hawks/Pistons are better than us next year....We would need to beat out all of the other teams to get 6th which i think is possible if we have good health...
But if some things go wrong next year we are either 8th or play ins....Health will be key and the history of our health has been poor so i hope it changes next year.
We're not top 6 but probably a Play-In team with the 7th or 8th seed. We should win 40ish games next year.
Yeah i could see 76ers being better next year, Pacers as well will not be totally bad they have a deep roster even with Hali out....Celtics could be bad with all their bigs gone.....Bulls/Wiz/Hornets could all improve...We are in a weird mix for sure...
Only thing that worries me we are an Ingram/Yak injury away from being a 30 win team again next year.
Yallbecrazy wrote:Tripod wrote:PushDaRock wrote:
If we have reasonable health and are only 10 wins better, things likely went pretty bad and the future outlook isn't good at all. This was a 30 win team while intentionally losing games for the last 1/4 of the season and getting decimated by injuries through the first half of the year while playing the toughest schedule in the league. If we had reasonable health and tried to win all our games even without Ingram, we probably would have been in the mid to high 30's in wins. 40 wins would basically be little if any improvement over that and pretty disappointing.
Yup.
I am expecting 45+ wins next year IF we add a reliable backup C. Anything less will be a disappointment
Adding a C will reduce CMB's minutes from 25 to < 15 a night. Currently he can be in the game for both Poeltl and Scottie. Think the Raps just need a 2.5nd string centre that really only sees time if 1 of Jak, Barnes, CMB is injured.
theonlyeastcoastrapsfan wrote:no, this is just excuse making for mistakes.Kingsway_fan wrote:HumbleRen wrote:IQ would have not gotten more than 25M a year in this current cap climate btw.
Crazy how much a difference a year makes once all of the teams realize the severity of the new CBA.
Doesn't change the Raptors cost of acquisition. Think of it as a canadian tax. Cost of doing business in Toronto.
While Other US teams MAY have paid less, that does not mean that we [Toronto Raptors] are equal. We need to pay a PREMIUM, all things being equal.