jschligs wrote:Don't shoot me but a coworker was trying to tell me we're getting Booker. I obviously don't believe it for a second but I'm imagining the scenario.
Not sure how we could get him, but it would be an amazing fit, on paper.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
jschligs wrote:Don't shoot me but a coworker was trying to tell me we're getting Booker. I obviously don't believe it for a second but I'm imagining the scenario.
BUCKnation wrote:I wouldn't say 3 years of 20+ mil on the books after his old deal would have expired is 'devasting' but its not ideal.
Did this move free up 40 mil from this year, not including the Turner deal?
emunney wrote:Bernman wrote:Matches Malone wrote:
Well, that's going to saddle us for a minute. We could really regret this in the long run, but we'll see how it works out. It's exciting, as of now, like the original Dame signing I had mixed feelings about then too.
This also doesn't explain what we traded for Turner. But we might have some cap space next season to add another creative force.
We signed him with cap space.
Ruben Quevedo wrote:I was not at all impressed with Turner in the playoffs. One of Indy's weakest players. Plays soft. He's much better than Ayton and is more mobile than Brook obviously but I just don't think he's very good.
MKE_Beers wrote:BUCKnation wrote:I wouldn't say 3 years of 20+ mil on the books after his old deal would have expired is 'devasting' but its not ideal.
Did this move free up 40 mil from this year, not including the Turner deal?
5 years of $20 plus million not 3
Swan Vox wrote:Turner is the perfect big next to Giannis.
Daver wrote:Ruben Quevedo wrote:I was not at all impressed with Turner in the playoffs. One of Indy's weakest players. Plays soft. He's much better than Ayton and is more mobile than Brook obviously but I just don't think he's very good.
His stats say different blocked alot of shots in tbe POs
jakecronus8 wrote:Haynes reporting Giannis isn't happy about waiving Dame?
Matches Malone wrote:BigO wrote:Matches Malone wrote:
What is with some of you guys trying to dunk on Cole Anthony.
Who do you have in mind?
I laid out why I don't like Cole Anthony. Nothing has changed in two days to change my mind.
Yes, we know, Big O. You're the authority.
So which names should we be monitoring for the Bucks? Think they could use some wing help still.
jakecronus8 wrote:Haynes reporting Giannis isn't happy about waiving Dame?
WeMajor34 wrote:Chris Haynes says that Giannis isn’t pleased with how the team waived Dame.
I personally think that’s Giannis getting out ahead of it and not wanting to upset Dame.
This all doesn’t happen if Giannis isn’t directly involved. Could be wrong but I don’t think I am.
Bernman wrote:emunney wrote:Bernman wrote:
Well, that's going to saddle us for a minute. We could really regret this in the long run, but we'll see how it works out. It's exciting, as of now, like the original Dame signing I had mixed feelings about then too.
This also doesn't explain what we traded for Turner. But we might have some cap space next season to add another creative force.
We signed him with cap space.
I suppose. So we didn't take the extra hit. Still got that future & bullets in the chamber. Plus probably some space next yr if we can get rid of Kuz at the deadline for an expiring. But it's a lot to adjust to #'s wise to know how much is available now or later.