robillionaire wrote:whocares1 wrote:robillionaire wrote:
What difference does that make? They were the defending nba champions and we won the series. Did you need us to dominate them by 20-30 pts every game for it to have counted for anything. The Thunder were inconsistent against Indiana and Denver and still won the championship sometimes playoff series go back and forth
It wasn’t back and forth. The only decisive victory the Knicks had all playoffs was Game 6 when the Celtics were already hurt and beaten down. Most victories the Knicks made miraculous comebacks and that isn’t sustainable. Not sure whats the attachment for Thibs other than continuity and familiarity but we needed a coach that could tell certain lineups aren’t working and make adjustments. Is that Brown? Maybe maybe not but for sure that wasn’t Thibs and that wasn’t going to change.
I think game 4 was also pretty decisive we were up like 10 and running away with a few minutes left when Tatum tore the Achilles. I don’t know why we have to minimize the team’s biggest playoff win since the turn of the century all to justify this coaching change
There were still like 3+ minutes in that game. They could’ve came back and won or they could’ve made it close. Game 5 against the Pacers would’ve been a better example but honestly Thibs set himself up. When he switched the starting lineup and then played more guys he was compromised. And the worst thing that happened to him was that the bench showed up. Thibs got himself fired.