KGtabake wrote:ConSarnit wrote:KGtabake wrote:
The whole thing is what the Bucks fanbase wants.
They wanted to ride with Giannis until the end of days. They don't seem to care about what will happen when Giannis eventually retires(or leaves). I think all of them know that they will be trash for years when this era ends.
And they embrace it.
It's their choice. If they want to dream about championships and glory days, who are you or me or anyone to forbid them that right?
If they believe that Porter can elevate to a star status and cover for Lillard, it's their belief.
Mocking another fanbase because they want to dream and hope is idiotic.
The problem with the guy i quoted(like many others on this thread) is that they post all the things they're posting because Giannis plays in Milwaukee.
I don't see 15 and 20 pages threads about the Wizards or the Hornets or the Raptors.
Why? Because none of these teams have a Giannis.
Like if Giannis leaves, do you think we're going to have daily threads about the Bucks?
Nobody will care.
Bucks fanbase knows that. They will probably never have the chance again in their lifetime to have a guy like that. Let them without trashing them.
Not all teams are the Lakers or the Celtics.
Im sorry, this is a BS argument. Bucks fans are using whataboutisms to try and discredit other posters opinions but we’re supposed to “leave the delicate Bucks fans alone!” There is big difference between hope and just plain lacking objectivity (which Bucks fans are doing in this thread). If they think they actually have a chance at contending with KPJ/Trent/Kuzma as their starting 1-3 they deserve to get pushed back on. Bucks fans don’t get to live in some protective bubble against criticism just because they have Giannis on their team.
Again. You continue to not understand.
The Bucks hold 2 picks that are going to be very valuable when the time comes.
2031 and 2032 firsts. That's probably lottery picks by then.
Kuzma is going to be an expiring next season.
If you make these 2 picks available (even with a swap) + the expiring of Kuzma you can get a pretty good player.
If you don't understand that i can't help you.
From the moment they did what they did with Dame, they're going all the way trading everything. And they have the most valuable picks now since everyone know that they're hoing to suck post 2030.
They're playing in the East. At some point people must understand that 1+1=2.
What are you talking about about? Nowhere in the post I responded to were you talking about trading Kuzma. I’m talking about you defending Bucks fans when they are also attacking other posters. What part of that don’t you get? Bucks fans don’t just get to use whataboutisms to try and discredit the valid concerns that linger about their team. They are not impervious to criticism as you would apparently prefer them to be.
Also, you are wrong about trading Kuzma because it’s not going to get the Bucks the types of players(s) they need. Consider their title winning team:
Lopez = Turner
Giannis = Giannis
Middleton = ?
Jrue = ?
We’re talking about having to replace 2 all-star level players in Middleton and Jrue. Kuzma, a 1st and a swap doesn’t get you 2 all-stars. The Bucks paid more draft assets than they currently have for both Jrue and Dame. How do you supposed the acquire a Middleton level player as well? This doesn’t even touch on trying to round out the roster with a $22.5m unusable hole in their cap. That’s starter level dead salary.
Can’t you see how behind the 8-ball the Bucks are when it comes to trying to build a contending team? Not only do they need 1-2 more all-star level players they are one of the more asset poor teams in the league AND they are basically relegated to operate under a cap environment from 3 years ago because of the $22.5m dead money.