ImageImageImageImageImage

Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package?

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

#9 for #23 + 2026 unprotected 1st (Higher pick between Pels and Bucks) ?

yes
103
72%
no
40
28%
 
Total votes: 143

User avatar
The Duke
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,802
And1: 3,459
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Location: Da Beaches

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#61 » by The Duke » Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:55 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
The Duke wrote:Just another head scratching decision to not pull the trigger. This roster needs long term upside, and we missed out on the potential of that.

Pick #9 and #23 very well finish within 7% rating in 2-3 years

Pels pick might be 40-80% higher rating then #9


If they had a Top 5 grade on CMB, trade makes a lot less sense.


And what if they had 9-10th grade on CMB, which is a lot more likely…
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,051
And1: 5,783
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#62 » by ConSarnit » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:35 pm

We should have 100% done the trade. It’s not just the Pels pick, it’s the best of both the Pels and Bucks

Pelicans:

-best player is massively injury prone
-lost their 2nd best player (Ingram) and replaced him with no similar talent
-Murray is out the entire year
-is likely starting Jordan Poole at point
-likely a play-in team at best if fully healthy

Bucks:

-one Giannis injury away from being the worst team in the league
-and the big one: what if MIL season starts badly or Giannis gets injured and they want to trade him: who do you think is in the driver’s seat in a Giannis trade if the Bucks end up wanting to tank this season? Perhaps the team that controls the Bucks unprotected 2026 pick?

The upside would have been worth the risk.
User avatar
LoveMyRaps
RealGM
Posts: 28,199
And1: 48,637
Joined: Jun 10, 2013
       

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#63 » by LoveMyRaps » Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:39 pm

The Duke wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
The Duke wrote:Just another head scratching decision to not pull the trigger. This roster needs long term upside, and we missed out on the potential of that.

Pick #9 and #23 very well finish within 7% rating in 2-3 years

Pels pick might be 40-80% higher rating then #9


If they had a Top 5 grade on CMB, trade makes a lot less sense.


And what if they had 9-10th grade on CMB, which is a lot more likely…


I HIGHLYYY doubt they had guys like Fears and Demin over CMB. Heck, I'm certain they would've taken CMB over Kon and Tre as well.
In Masai We Trust :meditate:
Image
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 12,464
And1: 9,583
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#64 » by PushDaRock » Sat Jun 28, 2025 6:02 pm

The Duke wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
The Duke wrote:Just another head scratching decision to not pull the trigger. This roster needs long term upside, and we missed out on the potential of that.

Pick #9 and #23 very well finish within 7% rating in 2-3 years

Pels pick might be 40-80% higher rating then #9


If they had a Top 5 grade on CMB, trade makes a lot less sense.


And what if they had 9-10th grade on CMB, which is a lot more likely…


They said they had him higher than 9
WhatsaTDot
RealGM
Posts: 11,285
And1: 7,221
Joined: May 16, 2010
Location: ♫ Whoa Black Betty Shambleland ♫

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#65 » by WhatsaTDot » Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:32 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
The Duke wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
If they had a Top 5 grade on CMB, trade makes a lot less sense.


And what if they had 9-10th grade on CMB, which is a lot more likely…


They said they had him higher than 9


Well they would no reason to be anything other than 100% transparent.
Image

This place is insufferable.
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 12,464
And1: 9,583
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#66 » by PushDaRock » Sun Jun 29, 2025 11:03 pm

WhatsaTDot wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
The Duke wrote:
And what if they had 9-10th grade on CMB, which is a lot more likely…


They said they had him higher than 9


Well they would no reason to be anything other than 100% transparent.


correct
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#67 » by Scase » Sun Jun 29, 2025 11:32 pm

theonlyeastcoastrapsfan wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
theonlyeastcoastrapsfan wrote:There's a report on Raptors Reddit that we turned down future first offfers for the 31st pick that we used on Mogbo last year.


Link?

https://www.reddit.com/r/torontoraptors/s/vdxTDvTzBl


Take this with a grain of salt but per Shams, the first pick of the second round is "currently being auctioned off to the highest bidder" and, per Matt Lloyd, "last year Toronto got great offers for the 31st overall pick, including some future 1st rounders."

Keep in mind that the 1st overall pick in the 2nd round doesn't count against the cap due to the new second round exception under the much maligned new CBA so while a team may not get that 4th year for a rookie scale contract, they do get some notable cap flexibility compared to, say, pick no. 26-30 in the 1st round.

Sweet christ that is actual malpractice. I'm sure there will be people defending this stupidity as well.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,575
And1: 4,849
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#68 » by TimeForChange » Sun Jun 29, 2025 11:35 pm

no one was offering future firsts for a second rounder in that crappy draft :lol:
AbC?
Head Coach
Posts: 6,624
And1: 10,645
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#69 » by AbC? » Fri Jul 4, 2025 1:47 am


Interesting article on the disastrous Pelicans Front Office:

From that moment on, text after text rolled in from league execs, agents, and friends. The friends were simply conducting a wellness check. The execs and agents? They were less friendly.

”That is the worst draft trade I have seen in over a decade,” one Eastern Conference executive lamented.

“They should all be fired next year when that becomes a top 5 pick,” relayed another.

One after another— it was a ruthless bombardment. ”Are they not aware of how good that pick is gonna be?” This line of questioning from one high level executive left me searching for answers across the next few days. Here is what I was able to dig up.

The League Does Not Respect Pelicans’ Decision Makers:

The league wide skepticism on the Pelicans started when Joe Dumars was named the head of basketball operations and only grew when Troy Weaver was brought into the fold. When the Pelicans traveled up to Chicago for the NBA Draft Combine a month prior, the league had already placed a target on their back.

”Man they were killing them up there,” one agent told me, referring to rival front offices. “They think they (the Pelicans) got F—in idiots in charge. It got so bad, I just felt sorry.” Teams were already jockeying for the privilege to conduct the first trade with the Pelicans as more than one executive jokingly expressed to me that the Pelicans are going to be their first call.

It was the Indiana Pacers that ended up gaining the privilege of being first. When the Pelicans traded the lightly protected 2026 pick from the Pacers for the rights to pick 23 in this draft, rival executives raised their eyebrows. What was the rush to conduct this move while the Pacers were still in the finals? Just hours after Shams broke the trade, the Pacers announced Haliburton has been diagnosed with a calf strain. The optics pointed to a team that had been duped.

Haliburton would go on to tear his Achilles tendon just a few days later, lending credibility to criticisms being levied by rival teams regarding the Pelicans’ decision making. The trade should have been executed after the finals. There was no reason the same deal would not have been on the table. The miscalculation was not a grave one, but it was one big enough to reinforce the priors for other teams— the Pelicans are a mark and do not understand risk.

Sure enough, the league’s collective belief on the Pelicans’ lack of risk assessment would be proven true. The Pelicans would trade the unprotected 2026 draft pick which was the better of their own and Milwaukee to move up 10 spots in the draft— to draft a player Troy Weaver was fixated on in Derik Queen. In totality, the Pelicans traded away three shots at top 10 pick for the 13th overall pick. All three shots featured a team with a starting point guard who had suffered a torn Achilles.

One league executive would tell me their internal models valued the traded pick as having the second highest probability for becoming number one overall next season. Suffice to say— the league was stunned, and so was Atlanta.

The Hawks could not believe their good fortune. While the Pelicans would spend the next 24 hours facing enormous backlash for their reckless decision making, Hawks executives weren’t shy about sharing the details behind deal’s lopsided structure with rival teams.

One Eastern executive with knowledge of how the conversation went from Atlanta’s perspective described a perplexing scene. When Senior Vice President Troy Weaver made the call to Atlanta’s Bryson Graham, Graham couldn’t believe what was actually being offered. Graham asked for clarification multiple times to confirm the unprotected pick was indeed part of the deal. It got to the point where Hawks General Manager, Onsi Saleh, called Joe Dumars directly to confirm for himself. The Hawks waited nervously for Dumars to confirm, hoping he would not realize what was going on and walk the trade back. But the Pelicans persisted and the Hawks got their steal.


Source: https://intheno.substack.com/p/queens-gambit-inside-the-pelicans

Raptors were gifted a golden opportunity to exploit the morons that are Dumars and Weaver and declined. A final act of incompetence by Masai before being fired. Good riddance.
Image
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#70 » by Los_29 » Fri Jul 4, 2025 2:10 am

Yes I would’ve taken a shot at it. I like CMB but the Pelicans stink (some on this forum loved their young core two years ago :D).

It would’ve also made us worse so we could be looking at two cracks in the lottery.

But why do people think Rogers would’ve signed off on this deal?
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,765
And1: 5,437
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#71 » by Yallbecrazy » Fri Jul 4, 2025 2:26 am

Gold Dragon wrote:If CMB was gone, then yes. But CMB was there so, no.


I had CMB #1 last year and #2 this year. He's likely to be a better pro than most of the top 5 next year imo let alone 6-10. I voted no, but I would have done it for anyone in this draft not named Flagg, Harper, Murray-Boyles, or Edgecombe.
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,765
And1: 5,437
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#72 » by Yallbecrazy » Fri Jul 4, 2025 2:37 am

Los_29 wrote:Yes I would’ve taken a shot at it. I like CMB but the Pelicans stink (some on this forum loved their young core two years ago :D).

It would’ve also made us worse so we could be looking at two cracks in the lottery.

But why do people think Rogers would’ve signed off on this deal?


I don't think ownership is required to sign off on draft pick trades? If they are it has to be a formality as if they didn't sign they could never make a draft day trade again unless the owner sells the team.
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,765
And1: 5,437
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#73 » by Yallbecrazy » Fri Jul 4, 2025 2:43 am

Dalek wrote:Easily would have done that deal. Maybe you don't get CMB but they could of got Asa Newell or Danny Wolf plus have a high pick the following year. They have to really believe in CMB, but what are they expecting him to be? A 20/10/5 starter, or a OG 3 and D type? I am not seeing the unlimited upside of CMB given his offensive limitations.


Asa Newell projects as a solid bench big that provides good rim finishing and some shooting along with decent rebounding, but poor defense. I don't foresee him ever being anything more than a 4th option.

Wolf likely busts due to his inefficient high volume shooting and tons of turnovers.

CMB had more rim attempts per game than every single player in college basketball last year. He also lead the conference in 2pt% while playing against the best defenses in the country on a team that provided him some of the worst spacing in the country. How is that 'offensive limitations '?
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,415
And1: 10,750
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#74 » by DreamTeam09 » Fri Jul 4, 2025 2:48 am

AbC? wrote:

Interesting article on the disastrous Pelicans Front Office:

From that moment on, text after text rolled in from league execs, agents, and friends. The friends were simply conducting a wellness check. The execs and agents? They were less friendly.

”That is the worst draft trade I have seen in over a decade,” one Eastern Conference executive lamented.

“They should all be fired next year when that becomes a top 5 pick,” relayed another.

One after another— it was a ruthless bombardment. ”Are they not aware of how good that pick is gonna be?” This line of questioning from one high level executive left me searching for answers across the next few days. Here is what I was able to dig up.

The League Does Not Respect Pelicans’ Decision Makers:

The league wide skepticism on the Pelicans started when Joe Dumars was named the head of basketball operations and only grew when Troy Weaver was brought into the fold. When the Pelicans traveled up to Chicago for the NBA Draft Combine a month prior, the league had already placed a target on their back.

”Man they were killing them up there,” one agent told me, referring to rival front offices. “They think they (the Pelicans) got F—in idiots in charge. It got so bad, I just felt sorry.” Teams were already jockeying for the privilege to conduct the first trade with the Pelicans as more than one executive jokingly expressed to me that the Pelicans are going to be their first call.

It was the Indiana Pacers that ended up gaining the privilege of being first. When the Pelicans traded the lightly protected 2026 pick from the Pacers for the rights to pick 23 in this draft, rival executives raised their eyebrows. What was the rush to conduct this move while the Pacers were still in the finals? Just hours after Shams broke the trade, the Pacers announced Haliburton has been diagnosed with a calf strain. The optics pointed to a team that had been duped.

Haliburton would go on to tear his Achilles tendon just a few days later, lending credibility to criticisms being levied by rival teams regarding the Pelicans’ decision making. The trade should have been executed after the finals. There was no reason the same deal would not have been on the table. The miscalculation was not a grave one, but it was one big enough to reinforce the priors for other teams— the Pelicans are a mark and do not understand risk.

Sure enough, the league’s collective belief on the Pelicans’ lack of risk assessment would be proven true. The Pelicans would trade the unprotected 2026 draft pick which was the better of their own and Milwaukee to move up 10 spots in the draft— to draft a player Troy Weaver was fixated on in Derik Queen. In totality, the Pelicans traded away three shots at top 10 pick for the 13th overall pick. All three shots featured a team with a starting point guard who had suffered a torn Achilles.

One league executive would tell me their internal models valued the traded pick as having the second highest probability for becoming number one overall next season. Suffice to say— the league was stunned, and so was Atlanta.

The Hawks could not believe their good fortune. While the Pelicans would spend the next 24 hours facing enormous backlash for their reckless decision making, Hawks executives weren’t shy about sharing the details behind deal’s lopsided structure with rival teams.

One Eastern executive with knowledge of how the conversation went from Atlanta’s perspective described a perplexing scene. When Senior Vice President Troy Weaver made the call to Atlanta’s Bryson Graham, Graham couldn’t believe what was actually being offered. Graham asked for clarification multiple times to confirm the unprotected pick was indeed part of the deal. It got to the point where Hawks General Manager, Onsi Saleh, called Joe Dumars directly to confirm for himself. The Hawks waited nervously for Dumars to confirm, hoping he would not realize what was going on and walk the trade back. But the Pelicans persisted and the Hawks got their steal.


Source: https://intheno.substack.com/p/queens-gambit-inside-the-pelicans

Raptors were gifted a golden opportunity to exploit the morons that are Dumars and Weaver and declined. A final act of incompetence by Masai before being fired. Good riddance.


Hey Einstein how do you know Bobby or Dan said no & turned the deal down. Masai wanted Khaman & Bobby wanted CP3
& You & others would've complained how we tanked a whole year only to trade another 1st rounder. lol you guy's are never happy
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#75 » by Los_29 » Fri Jul 4, 2025 2:57 am

Yallbecrazy wrote:
Los_29 wrote:Yes I would’ve taken a shot at it. I like CMB but the Pelicans stink (some on this forum loved their young core two years ago :D).

It would’ve also made us worse so we could be looking at two cracks in the lottery.

But why do people think Rogers would’ve signed off on this deal?


I don't think ownership is required to sign off on draft pick trades? If they are it has to be a formality as if they didn't sign they could never make a draft day trade again unless the owner sells the team.


There were a few reports about how Rogers pushed for win-now moves and weren’t interested in a longer rebuild. So it made me think that they wouldn’t be too keen dropping to 23rd for a pick next year.
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,791
And1: 9,867
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#76 » by Clutch0z24 » Fri Jul 4, 2025 6:20 am

Front office was pretty dumb to not take the trade if offered....One of the Bucks/Pels will have a bad year and we would get the best pick....

Also Asa Newell was there to be picked at 23.....If Asa Newell has a good season it will be even worse for us....CMB has to be pretty damn good for us not take that deal.
Image
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,177
And1: 13,803
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#77 » by Los_29 » Fri Jul 4, 2025 8:23 am

Clutch0z24 wrote:Front office was pretty dumb to not take the trade if offered....One of the Bucks/Pels will have a bad year and we would get the best pick....

Also Asa Newell was there to be picked at 23.....If Asa Newell has a good season it will be even worse for us....CMB has to be pretty damn good for us not take that deal.


lol, there are always people that slip in the draft and 99% of the time it’s for the right reason. And slipped according to who? Online mock drafts? Front offices are always going to see things differently.

Many mock drafts also had Asa Newell outside of the lottery. And many reputable draft analysts did not think too highly of Newell’s game.
sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,976
And1: 3,805
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#78 » by sidsid » Fri Jul 4, 2025 8:20 pm

I don't know if it was on the table, but RJ for Patrick Williams+expiring+12 should have absolutely been done if it was possible. The Bulls could still get the 23rd pick while the Raps take the 2026 pick option.

Solves your short term cap problem next year, or creates a glorious new one with a top lotto pick the following year.

These are unfortunately not the types of trades the FO has prioritized, since it provides a delayed benefit instead of an immediate one.
Rodrickle
Rookie
Posts: 1,012
And1: 653
Joined: Mar 16, 2021

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#79 » by Rodrickle » Fri Jul 4, 2025 10:10 pm

seems pretty accurate. Wolf seems like he'll be a tank commander with his turnovers and nad shooting, if he's in a semi high usage role, like he's probably going to be being on a bad team. Only way he's might be ok is on a team that limits his role and he improves his shooting. That won't be on the Nets imo.

Sent from my SM-S721W using RealGM mobile app
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,549
And1: 17,860
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

Re: Would you have traded #9 for the Pelicans package? 

Post#80 » by Basketball_Jones » Fri Jul 4, 2025 10:41 pm

I like CMB but the fit is questionable. Who knows if it was really offered and Bobby/Masai just wanted to take talent now and win for Rogers. Wouldn’t surprise me though.
2019 Eastern Conference All Stars

Derozan
Lowry
Ibaka
Valanciunas
Van Vleet
Delon Wright
Lebron
Embiid

There are only 2 teams in the league that rank in the top 6 in offensive and defensive efficiency: the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors.

Return to Toronto Raptors