Cleveland: Porter
Portland: Reath
Portland gets an extra year of control out of Porter and gets their 3rd PG to cover when Scoot or Holiday get hurt
Cleveland has no backup Center and Reath has a 1 year contract that can fill that void.
Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,013
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,747
- And1: 10,409
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
It’s fine
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,036
- And1: 2,362
- Joined: Sep 26, 2003
- Contact:
-
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
Meh, I'd probably move RW3 first. Can't count on him being healthy if he's needed.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,105
- And1: 2,467
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
With Garland missing the beginning of the season with the toe surgery and Jerome gone, the Cavs probably need the PG more than the C.
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,013
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
toooskies wrote:With Garland missing the beginning of the season with the toe surgery and Jerome gone, the Cavs probably need the PG more than the C.
I disagree. They have Ball, Tyson, and Mitchell to handle the ball even if Garland misses the start of the season. Regardless, they could make this trade whenever he comes back if both teams want to wait.
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,105
- And1: 2,467
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
bgrep14 wrote:toooskies wrote:With Garland missing the beginning of the season with the toe surgery and Jerome gone, the Cavs probably need the PG more than the C.
I disagree. They have Ball, Tyson, and Mitchell to handle the ball even if Garland misses the start of the season. Regardless, they could make this trade whenever he comes back if both teams want to wait.
Tyson and Mitchell aren’t PGs and Ball’s injury history means you shouldn’t count on him.
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 140
- And1: 81
- Joined: Jan 06, 2020
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
I'm keeping Porter, i think he's going to play a lot this year...hopefully he's up for the challenge.
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,676
- And1: 35,740
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
If legal, I'd do it.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,474
- And1: 2,174
- Joined: Jan 23, 2005
- Location: Madrid, Spain
-
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
In his time in Portland I have to wonder how much has been real injury and how much was tanking or giving other guys minutes? I imagine that a lot of the time, if it were a playoff series, Williams would have been on the court.DaVoiceMaster wrote:Meh, I'd probably move RW3 first. Can't count on him being healthy if he's needed.
Personally I expect him to get a lot of minutes this season for us.
BTW I am ok with this trade.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,013
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland and Portland - Small Swap
toooskies wrote:bgrep14 wrote:toooskies wrote:With Garland missing the beginning of the season with the toe surgery and Jerome gone, the Cavs probably need the PG more than the C.
I disagree. They have Ball, Tyson, and Mitchell to handle the ball even if Garland misses the start of the season. Regardless, they could make this trade whenever he comes back if both teams want to wait.
Tyson and Mitchell aren’t PGs and Ball’s injury history means you shouldn’t count on him.
Tyson played point guard in college. Regardless, if you don’t consider him a natural point guard both him, Mitchell, and Tyson operate as primary ball handlers.
Return to Trades and Transactions