drosestruts wrote:if your desperation for something new has you upset we didn't acquire Cam Whitmore, please take a deep breath.
These end of the bench guys so many are ready to dump - Dalen Terry, Julian Phillips, etc. are basically just as good as Whitmore.
They're really not. That's part of the point. Let's call it point A:
The guys you've named have done nothing in their NBA careers that suggests that they're as good as Whitmore. He has some documented success that far exceeds what the Bulls' scrubs have done.
On the other hand, it's totally fair to tell people that we couldn't actually have gotten Whitmore, as some others have done here. There seem to have been backstage political issues with Houston and Washington and Whitmore's agent, and maybe Washington got a deal because Whitmore wanted to play in his hometown and his agent and Houston earned goodwill by facilitating it. That could be the case. And at any rate, the Bulls would have been only one among many teams who could used Whitmore for the price of two seconds.
That said, some posters here have made clear that it's not so much about Whitmore in particular and more about the kind of value/ arbitrage mindset-- where GMs try to stockpile talent that could be traded in the future if it can be acquired for a good price-- that we haven't seen from the Bulls' front office. That's the REAL takeaway point here, I think.
Let's call it point B: we would like to see more of a smart, asset-based mindset in the Bulls' front office.
I'd put Point A as being 10% of the real issue here, and Point B as 90% of it.
In other words, it's not so much about Whitmore as about a desire to see the Bulls' FO indicate that they're building an excellent team with a clear blueprint and principles.