Post#1819 » by -Jragon- » Mon Jul 7, 2025 3:53 pm
I think when you look at the "experts" opinion, it's based in ignorance in that what we did with Dame isn't the common move. Also, they are parroting what other gms likely say because, again, it's not the common move. Commonly, either a team just eats the deal and tries to piece around it for the injury year and be patient or they go straight to the rebuild and trade the franchise for hopeful draft picks.
In this case, the writing is on the wall that noone Dame's age has ever come back and been the same after this injury (if I'm wrong then it's like 1 dude). If another team believes in him, that lowers our yearly burden.. but percentage wise ... there's almost zero chance that he would be nearly "himself" these next 2 years and that would have wasted/disgruntled Giannis likely. So looking at reasons the "experts" won't admit:
1. Happy Giannis more likely to extend
2. Better defense with Turner and without Dame
3. Dame/Giannis didn't really meld anyways
4. Dames payment should get reduced some based on what he signs
5. The cap goes up so that that 22mil will be a lower percentage as it goes
6. Turner matches our team's age better than Dame
7. Turner signed a team friendly deal since it's a year not many teams had space to give him more
8. The guards we retained play better D than Dame and likely won't mind deferring to Giannis/Turner/Portis more inside out ball
9. Idk there are probably many more reasons they ignore just because they're salty their Giannis trade story isn't happening lol
ShootingtheJ wrote:This team needs more Middleton's, not less.