
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
SpurNani wrote:Val isn't really a meaningful player anymore. If I were Denver I would let him go and get the MLE.
You'd probably get a very unmotivated guy if you forced the guy to play when he clearly wants to leave and be close to his family
durden_tyler wrote:This is a very curious thread— since it just involves a scrub who really won’t move the needle for an NBA team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nuntius wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:So you still haven’t provided me any examples. When a player is in contract, what loophole/power move does an NBA team (or any team) uses to get that player outright and his original team gets no compensation? If so, what players were able to do so?
And, once again, you're proving that you didn't quite understand my point. I will state my point once again:
Not every player in Europe (or elsewhere in the world) has an NBA out clause.
Here. That's my point. That's what I said. Do we agree on that or not?Wallace_Wallace wrote:The drafting part sounds irrelevant since Jonas is way beyond that. But if the NBA teams draft players against their will, do they not have freedom to stay in Europe (IE Fran Vazquez-Orlando)? Those players are not forced to report to the NBA correct? So essentially, Orlando in that situation, wasted a lottery pick.
No, they aren't forced to report to the NBA. They can stay in Europe if they want. But if they ever want to go to the NBA then they have to go to the team that picked them against their will.
sackings916 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:This is a very curious thread— since it just involves a scrub who really won’t move the needle for an NBA team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly. I can’t figure out how or why this thread is 30 pages. He’s a fringe 3rd big/4th big at this point in his career.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:Nuntius wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:So you still haven’t provided me any examples. When a player is in contract, what loophole/power move does an NBA team (or any team) uses to get that player outright and his original team gets no compensation? If so, what players were able to do so?
And, once again, you're proving that you didn't quite understand my point. I will state my point once again:
Not every player in Europe (or elsewhere in the world) has an NBA out clause.
Here. That's my point. That's what I said. Do we agree on that or not?Wallace_Wallace wrote:The drafting part sounds irrelevant since Jonas is way beyond that. But if the NBA teams draft players against their will, do they not have freedom to stay in Europe (IE Fran Vazquez-Orlando)? Those players are not forced to report to the NBA correct? So essentially, Orlando in that situation, wasted a lottery pick.
No, they aren't forced to report to the NBA. They can stay in Europe if they want. But if they ever want to go to the NBA then they have to go to the team that picked them against their will.
So what if there’s no NBA clause, you don’t think there’s any other language that speaks about leaving before the contract expires? Or are you living in this fantasy land? The NBA (or any league) has to approach the said team and ask “I want player x, what’s the requirement?” If the conditions are too high, then they wait until the contract expires or the buyout amount is reduced as the contract is getting closer to the end.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:European players have an NBA out clause set at X dollars depending on how many years are left.
Nuntius wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:European players have an NBA out clause set at X dollars depending on how many years are left.
Nope. Not all of them. It depends on the contract they have signed. Some of them have an NBA out clause while others don't have such a clause.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:If that wasn’t the case, feel free to give me examples, like I asked the previous 2 times. I gave you 3 in basketball, 1 in soccer.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:You other little rant, isn’t that the point of the NBA draft? Did you missed the whole Ace Bailey situation two weeks ago? Maybe you’re in the NFL, did you missed the whole Sheduer Sanders draft slid fiasco? Go back and review the draft thread and see who was on the NBA/Utah’s side and who was on Bailey’s.
Nuntius wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:Nuntius wrote:
And, once again, you're proving that you didn't quite understand my point. I will state my point once again:
Not every player in Europe (or elsewhere in the world) has an NBA out clause.
Here. That's my point. That's what I said. Do we agree on that or not?
No, they aren't forced to report to the NBA. They can stay in Europe if they want. But if they ever want to go to the NBA then they have to go to the team that picked them against their will.
So what if there’s no NBA clause, you don’t think there’s any other language that speaks about leaving before the contract expires? Or are you living in this fantasy land? The NBA (or any league) has to approach the said team and ask “I want player x, what’s the requirement?” If the conditions are too high, then they wait until the contract expires or the buyout amount is reduced as the contract is getting closer to the end.
Alright, you're still missing the point here so let's rewind this discussion a bit.
Here's the initial point you made that prompted my response:
Page 28, post #544:Wallace_Wallace wrote:European players have an NBA out clause set at X dollars depending on how many years are left.
The above is in page 28, post #544.
And here's my response:Nuntius wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:European players have an NBA out clause set at X dollars depending on how many years are left.
Nope. Not all of them. It depends on the contract they have signed. Some of them have an NBA out clause while others don't have such a clause.
The above is in page page 29, post #563.
This is the disagreement. You posited that all players in Europe have an NBA out clause and I said that this is not the case. This is untrue. Not every player in Europe (or elsewhere) has an NBA out clause.Wallace_Wallace wrote:If that wasn’t the case, feel free to give me examples, like I asked the previous 2 times. I gave you 3 in basketball, 1 in soccer.
Sure. Kendrick Nunn's current contract is a prime example.Wallace_Wallace wrote:You other little rant, isn’t that the point of the NBA draft? Did you missed the whole Ace Bailey situation two weeks ago? Maybe you’re in the NFL, did you missed the whole Sheduer Sanders draft slid fiasco? Go back and review the draft thread and see who was on the NBA/Utah’s side and who was on Bailey’s.
I have no knowledge on the NFL situation so I cannot comment on that. But as far as the Ace Bailey situation is concerned, Bailey did declare for the draft. Mirotic12 was talking about players who never declared for the NBA draft and still got drafted so the two situations aren't really similar.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:Now, even if there’s no NBA out clause for all players,
Wallace_Wallace wrote:what is the language to prevent other teams (NBA or other foreign teams) to outright sign the players while they’re in contract? We are still going back and forth regarding buyout/transfer fees and NBA out clauses. Bottom line is still a fee to pay if the players still in contract. Jonas Valenciunas is still in contract, therefore he needs to have a buyout, either he and/or his new team pays the amount.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:The Kendrick Nunn situation you listed sounds like another wrongdoing by the same team (not the NBA screwing over an European team). Nunn exercised his player option and received around 5 million that season, then Panathinaikos just signed him without any resistance from Washington. Unless Washington is planning on releasing him, doesn’t that sound like malpractice to you? If Washington wasn’t a bottom feeder, and Nunn plays an integral role, then absolutely there should be a situation similar to now.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:Regarding the draft, if all players go through the same process, what makes the foreign prospects more special? I’m sure everyone wants to be a free agent right off the bat. Unless they want to go the Austin Reaves route (could be a strategy for prospects in the future), but if an European player wants to play for the NBA then unfortunately that is the process.
Nuntius wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:Now, even if there’s no NBA out clause for all players,
Glad that we finally agree that not every player outside of the US has an NBA out clause.Wallace_Wallace wrote:what is the language to prevent other teams (NBA or other foreign teams) to outright sign the players while they’re in contract? We are still going back and forth regarding buyout/transfer fees and NBA out clauses. Bottom line is still a fee to pay if the players still in contract. Jonas Valenciunas is still in contract, therefore he needs to have a buyout, either he and/or his new team pays the amount.
Which is exactly what Valanciunas is trying to do. He's trying to buy out his contract and Denver isn't willing to agree to any kind of buyout because they feel slighted by the miscommunication explained in the tweets that HotRocks34 has posted.Wallace_Wallace wrote:The Kendrick Nunn situation you listed sounds like another wrongdoing by the same team (not the NBA screwing over an European team). Nunn exercised his player option and received around 5 million that season, then Panathinaikos just signed him without any resistance from Washington. Unless Washington is planning on releasing him, doesn’t that sound like malpractice to you? If Washington wasn’t a bottom feeder, and Nunn plays an integral role, then absolutely there should be a situation similar to now.
What? Nunn signed a two-year deal with the Lakers on August of 2021. The Wizards traded for him on January of 2023. Nunn's contract expired at the end of the 2023 season. Nunn signed with Panathinaikos on October of 2023.
Where exactly is the wrongdoing here?
Seriously, why are you making me defend a team I hate? This sucks![]()
Wallace_Wallace wrote:Regarding the draft, if all players go through the same process, what makes the foreign prospects more special? I’m sure everyone wants to be a free agent right off the bat. Unless they want to go the Austin Reaves route (could be a strategy for prospects in the future), but if an European player wants to play for the NBA then unfortunately that is the process.
Because the "automatically eligible at 22 even if they haven't declared for the NBA draft" only applies to international players.
sackings916 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:This is a very curious thread— since it just involves a scrub who really won’t move the needle for an NBA team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly. I can’t figure out how or why this thread is 30 pages. He’s a fringe 3rd big/4th big at this point in his career.
remiga007 wrote:sackings916 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:This is a very curious thread— since it just involves a scrub who really won’t move the needle for an NBA team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly. I can’t figure out how or why this thread is 30 pages. He’s a fringe 3rd big/4th big at this point in his career.
1. A true contender Nuggets get (or dont) good backup for Jokic which they were unable to do in half a decade. Thats huge, especially as they almost have no options now beside Val; thats why they dont want to let him go now;
2. JV is not 4th big at this point of his career. His PER numbers this last season were really close to his best years, with way improved passing and understanding of playing defence. Yeah he is slower but he has always been slowest guy on the court.
3. The situation with Panathinaikos is unique and for many much more interesting than another aging ex superstar trade or extensions to Max players which were gonna happen anyway.
Youre welcome.
The two can both be trueNuntius wrote:Optms wrote:Nuntius wrote:
He doesn't want to play in the US anymore, period. It has nothing to do with Denver in particular.
So he suddenly decides this immediately after the trade? What a coincidence, huh.
Based on everything we've read so far, he decided that the moment he was offered a contract by a team outside the US.
I will agree with the others that said that your trolling is pretty poor.
Val isn't a scrub, get realdurden_tyler wrote:This is a very curious thread— since it just involves a scrub who really won’t move the needle for an NBA team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exp0sed wrote:
A reminder that this is a team that took the juggernaut OKC to 7 games with their second option playing horrendously, all with a rookie HC who got the gig a week before the playoffs
They don't need much to get over the hump and backup C has been for years, their most mind-boggling and glaring hole
Sent from my SM-A055F using RealGM mobile app
remiga007 wrote:sackings916 wrote:durden_tyler wrote:This is a very curious thread— since it just involves a scrub who really won’t move the needle for an NBA team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly. I can’t figure out how or why this thread is 30 pages. He’s a fringe 3rd big/4th big at this point in his career.
1. A true contender Nuggets get (or dont) good backup for Jokic which they were unable to do in half a decade. Thats huge, especially as they almost have no options now beside Val; thats why they dont want to let him go now;
2. JV is not 4th big at this point of his career. His PER numbers this last season were really close to his best years, with way improved passing and understanding of playing defence. Yeah he is slower but he has always been slowest guy on the court.
3. The situation with Panathinaikos is unique and for many much more interesting than another aging ex superstar trade or extensions to Max players which were gonna happen anyway.
Youre welcome.
nomansland wrote:remiga007 wrote:sackings916 wrote:
Exactly. I can’t figure out how or why this thread is 30 pages. He’s a fringe 3rd big/4th big at this point in his career.
1. A true contender Nuggets get (or dont) good backup for Jokic which they were unable to do in half a decade. Thats huge, especially as they almost have no options now beside Val; thats why they dont want to let him go now;
2. JV is not 4th big at this point of his career. His PER numbers this last season were really close to his best years, with way improved passing and understanding of playing defence. Yeah he is slower but he has always been slowest guy on the court.
3. The situation with Panathinaikos is unique and for many much more interesting than another aging ex superstar trade or extensions to Max players which were gonna happen anyway.
Youre welcome.
Good reasons.
Beyond that, this has interesting implications for how the NBA and international leagues interact in the future. You can bet that Adam Silver and the NBA governors are watching how this plays out with keen interest.