ImageImageImageImage

NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,925
And1: 590
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#121 » by three3d » Wed Jul 9, 2025 4:37 pm

We played with the second slowest pace of game this season , now factor in Paolo’s lack luster efficiency with a horrible offense and explain to me how Paolo still averaged 25.9 points per game this season.

It’s actually pretty crazy he should have been top 10 in the league in scoring with so many deficiencies.
three3d
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,925
And1: 590
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#122 » by three3d » Wed Jul 9, 2025 4:44 pm

This is the key to an unlocking Paolo’s full potential. How much of this have we been doing so far?

NBA teams with two elite point forwards would likely implement an offense built around ball movement, player movement, and exploiting the mismatches these players create.
Here are some offensive principles and strategies they might utilize:
1. Primary and secondary playmaking
With two elite playmaking forwards, the offense wouldn't rely on a single primary ball-handler. Instead, both players would share ball-handling and playmaking responsibilities, initiating the offense and creating opportunities for themselves and teammates from various spots on the court.
One could bring the ball up the floor, while the other positions themselves in the post or on the wing, ready to initiate secondary actions or capitalize on defensive shifts.
2. Exploiting mismatches
The essence of the point forward position is to leverage the size and strength of a forward against smaller defenders, while utilizing point guard skills like ball-handling and passing.
Two point forwards create multiple mismatch opportunities. They could post up smaller defenders, drive past slower big men, or utilize screens to get open looks or create openings for teammates.
3. High-low action and post play
Having two forwards allows for effective high-low action, with one player flashing high and the other sealing inside, creating potential scoring chances in the post or for kick-outs to open perimeter shooters.
The post-play of the point forwards would also be a significant offensive weapon, as seen with players like Scottie Pippen, who popularized the point forward position.
4. Constant motion and off-ball screens
A motion offense, emphasizing continuous player movement and off-ball screens, would maximize the offensive potential of two skilled playmakers.
Point forwards can effectively utilize screens to get open for shots, create driving lanes, or draw defenders to open up other teammates.
5. Transition offense
Point forwards are often excellent in transition, capable of grabbing defensive rebounds, dribbling the ball up the court, and initiating fast breaks.
With two such players, teams could push the pace and generate numerous easy scoring opportunities before the defense can set up.
6. Offensive spacing and versatility
The ability of the point forwards to operate both inside and outside, handle the ball, and distribute, allows for versatile offensive sets and formations.
Teams can adjust their spacing and actions based on defensive strategies, keeping the opponent off balance.
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,541
And1: 11,111
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#123 » by KillMonger » Wed Jul 9, 2025 10:13 pm

The fact that in back to back playoffs he has been a badass, at that point I don't care about the regular season numbers..... Where it matters the most he's averaging 28/8/5....with the team we have..... The horrible spacing and pace..... At those numbers is the max really that much of a surprise?

Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
Image
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 25,967
And1: 15,367
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#124 » by Def Swami » Wed Jul 9, 2025 10:15 pm

Good bet on Paolo
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,082
And1: 7,720
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#125 » by RookieStar » Wed Jul 9, 2025 11:08 pm

KillMonger wrote:The fact that in back to back playoffs he has been a badass, at that point I don't care about the regular season numbers..... Where it matters the most he's averaging 28/8/5....with the team we have..... The horrible spacing and pace..... At those numbers is the max really that much of a surprise?

Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app


Gives me Tmac vibes.... our franchise star player shines and is breaking his back carrying scrubs. But still stuck in the 1st round

Hopefully this season our team can help the load
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,413
And1: 9,436
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#126 » by eyriq » Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:16 am

Read on Twitter
?t=b4s23qK5t-_I1tDIjMsIwQ&s=19
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,295
And1: 16,172
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#127 » by VFX » Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:36 am

eyriq wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=b4s23qK5t-_I1tDIjMsIwQ&s=19


Stupid argument.

Completely different players tasked with entirely different things.

Chet is a defender that increases in value with his shooting and floor spacing.

Paolo is a primary option on offense.

Williams is closer to Paolo in terms of role and production but he’s insulated by not being a #1 option. Hes like Jaylen Brown IMO.. in the perfect role given for his skillset and likely looks worse in a different situation as a #1 option.
User avatar
KillMonger
RealGM
Posts: 20,541
And1: 11,111
Joined: Oct 13, 2012
     

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#128 » by KillMonger » Thu Jul 10, 2025 1:00 am

Ultimately it's why the others left, except shaq that was a money issue..... As long as Paolo and Franz are ready to compete now we should be surrounding them with players that will help them win

Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
Image
JoshuaPotter
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 993
Joined: Dec 19, 2022
   

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#129 » by JoshuaPotter » Thu Jul 10, 2025 1:09 pm

VFX wrote:
eyriq wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=b4s23qK5t-_I1tDIjMsIwQ&s=19


Stupid argument.

Completely different players tasked with entirely different things.

Chet is a defender that increases in value with his shooting and floor spacing.

Paolo is a primary option on offense.

Williams is closer to Paolo in terms of role and production but he’s insulated by not being a #1 option. Hes like Jaylen Brown IMO.. in the perfect role given for his skillset and likely looks worse in a different situation as a #1 option.


I am kinda happy to see that this is being talked about at the highest level. I do think in terms of "worth" that Chet value is "worth it more" and that Chet has "more to prove" in the long haul.

That isn't meant to disparage what he is (Chet) good at. It's simply an admission. Chet in my humble opinion has a potential higher ceiling then Paolo still and thats why you max him. The odds of Chet being successful at taking more of an offensive load and still doing well is pretty good in my humble opinion.

At the same time, as inefficient as Paolo is you swap Chet for Paolo here and we don't make the playoffs, but we are also two completely different teams so its not a great comp. However swap SGA for literally any guard in our backcourt.....finals?

Point I am trying to make is either team in this same situation with same players should max both and watch them grow. Well see if they can climb into the elite stratosphere and if they are worth it over time.
fateis007
Rookie
Posts: 1,211
And1: 991
Joined: Dec 15, 2013

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#130 » by fateis007 » Thu Jul 10, 2025 1:33 pm

JoshuaPotter wrote:
VFX wrote:
eyriq wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=b4s23qK5t-_I1tDIjMsIwQ&s=19


Stupid argument.

Completely different players tasked with entirely different things.

Chet is a defender that increases in value with his shooting and floor spacing.

Paolo is a primary option on offense.

Williams is closer to Paolo in terms of role and production but he’s insulated by not being a #1 option. Hes like Jaylen Brown IMO.. in the perfect role given for his skillset and likely looks worse in a different situation as a #1 option.


I am kinda happy to see that this is being talked about at the highest level. I do think in terms of "worth" that Chet value is "worth it more" and that Chet has "more to prove" in the long haul.

That isn't meant to disparage what he is (Chet) good at. It's simply an admission. Chet in my humble opinion has a potential higher ceiling then Paolo still and thats why you max him. The odds of Chet being successful at taking more of an offensive load and still doing well is pretty good in my humble opinion.

At the same time, as inefficient as Paolo is you swap Chet for Paolo here and we don't make the playoffs, but we are also two completely different teams so its not a great comp. However swap SGA for literally any guard in our backcourt.....finals?

Point I am trying to make is either team in this same situation with same players should max both and watch them grow. Well see if they can climb into the elite stratosphere and if they are worth it over time.


Chet has also missed like 130 games in 3 years and has already had a major surgery . Give me 6'11, 260 all day. Chet is perfect in his role, but you can't ignore the fact that he is a walking stick and so far his body hasn't held up well.
JoshuaPotter
Analyst
Posts: 3,492
And1: 993
Joined: Dec 19, 2022
   

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#131 » by JoshuaPotter » Thu Jul 10, 2025 1:58 pm

fateis007 wrote:
JoshuaPotter wrote:
VFX wrote:
Stupid argument.

Completely different players tasked with entirely different things.

Chet is a defender that increases in value with his shooting and floor spacing.

Paolo is a primary option on offense.

Williams is closer to Paolo in terms of role and production but he’s insulated by not being a #1 option. Hes like Jaylen Brown IMO.. in the perfect role given for his skillset and likely looks worse in a different situation as a #1 option.


I am kinda happy to see that this is being talked about at the highest level. I do think in terms of "worth" that Chet value is "worth it more" and that Chet has "more to prove" in the long haul.

That isn't meant to disparage what he is (Chet) good at. It's simply an admission. Chet in my humble opinion has a potential higher ceiling then Paolo still and thats why you max him. The odds of Chet being successful at taking more of an offensive load and still doing well is pretty good in my humble opinion.

At the same time, as inefficient as Paolo is you swap Chet for Paolo here and we don't make the playoffs, but we are also two completely different teams so its not a great comp. However swap SGA for literally any guard in our backcourt.....finals?

Point I am trying to make is either team in this same situation with same players should max both and watch them grow. Well see if they can climb into the elite stratosphere and if they are worth it over time.


Chet has also missed like 130 games in 3 years and has already had a major surgery . Give me 6'11, 260 all day. Chet is perfect in his role, but you can't ignore the fact that he is a walking stick and so far his body hasn't held up well.


Yeah and that's kinda my point. They are paying him purely off of his potential and they already won a ring. No ring? They may wait one more year.
Orlando Dawg
Analyst
Posts: 3,445
And1: 109
Joined: Mar 15, 2002
Location: Orlando

Re: NEWS: Paolo Banchero Agrees to a 5-Year Maximum Extension 

Post#132 » by Orlando Dawg » Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:12 pm

Chet is like JI …. Big mistake giving him the max

As for Paolo’s final year option after spending a year with an injury, to be fair in turn the Magic should have required their own option on that year too. So,the 5th year would be a team/player option.

Return to Orlando Magic