Dr Positivity wrote:I think Barrett for Kuzma is looking likely.
With a 1st, sure. But Kuz is a culture killer. I would avoid it unless the 1st was lightly protected
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Dr Positivity wrote:I think Barrett for Kuzma is looking likely.
Dr Positivity wrote:I think Barrett for Kuzma is looking likely.
Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
Dr Positivity wrote:I think Barrett for Kuzma is looking likely.
ash_k wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:I think Barrett for Kuzma is looking likely.
fireable offense to trade a player about to turn 30 that just choked in the playoffs for a player that just turned 25 doing 20+|5+|5+|50FG%
Potential wrote:Hell no to Kuzma. Outside of that I would like to see a deal right now just to see a deal. I wanna feel the rush. We were teased with the rumors of having a big offseason but all we had was the draft day excitement and that's it. Make a move Bobby!
MoneyBall wrote:ConSarnit wrote:MoneyBall wrote:Defense is also kind of important.
?
Agbaji is a good defender. Prior to him finding his 3pt shot last season that was literally his greatest skill.
Do you not know who Keon Ellis is? It's ok if you don't, but to say Ochai is on the same level as him defensively is laughable. Ellis ranks in the 99th percentile in block rate and 88th percentile is steal rate among combo guards. He finished 2nd in the NBA in deflections per 36 minutes. DeRozan likened Ellis to Alex Coruso. His DBPM of 2.0 ranks him #3 among all SG's and #1 among all bench SG.
Dalek wrote:PushDaRock wrote:Dalek wrote:
RJ is a cornerstone? No, and it is mainly because you know his next contract likely pushes Toronto to a second apron and we also have to think about extensions for Dick and Walter who both can surpass RJ's level of play.
RJ has been 6 years in the league and he benefitted from Darko's system which played to his strengths. This is the best time to cash in while his value is at an all-time high. Otherwise you get stuck in a Jeremy Grant situation where you end up stuck with a guy on a long deal that is hard to move.
It is great that RJ gets to the rim but we also have Scottie Barnes and CMB that can do similar things as wing/forwards. Not to mention Walter and Quickley also wanting to drive the ball. Waiting until the playoffs for some type of proof seems like a poor plan. If he fails to perform then the value really plummets.
What exactly are we cashing in on? Do you think teams right now view the 2 years left on his deal as a positive or a negative?
He is not an expiring deal and coming off the best scoring season of his career efficiency-wise. I do think teams see value in RJ if they have room for a future deal with him.
The Kings seem ideal because of the Scott Perry connection - he drafted RJ in NY.
Brooklyn and Washington have capacity and need for a player like RJ.
Maybe the Bucks would take a swing thinking he can replace some of the lost guard play they had from Lillard.
MoneyBall wrote:PushDaRock wrote:MoneyBall wrote:He'd be a starter, and a better one than anyone we currently have. Again, which one of those guys is better than Ellis?
He started games in SAC as well, the point is his role here wouldn't be much different than it is there.
He started those games due to injuries, not because he's their #1 SG. He would be our #1 SG with the strong possibility of getting more than 24mpg. His role would definitely change.
ConSarnit wrote:MoneyBall wrote:ConSarnit wrote:
?
Agbaji is a good defender. Prior to him finding his 3pt shot last season that was literally his greatest skill.
Do you not know who Keon Ellis is? It's ok if you don't, but to say Ochai is on the same level as him defensively is laughable. Ellis ranks in the 99th percentile in block rate and 88th percentile is steal rate among combo guards. He finished 2nd in the NBA in deflections per 36 minutes. DeRozan likened Ellis to Alex Coruso. His DBPM of 2.0 ranks him #3 among all SG's and #1 among all bench SG.
The gap between him and Agbaji isn’t big if there is any at all. 1) having your own teammate prop you up isn’t some definitive proof of anything. 2) if you actually knew anything about advanced defensive stats you’d know that DPBM is bunk. 3) If Ellis is great defender why is his DFG +2%? Why are players shooting better against him than their average? Agbaji is -2% DFG if you’re wondering Caruso has a -7% DFG. Now, is DFG% the be all end all of defense? No. But neither is steal rate. That doesn’t even mention his piddling defensive rebound rate (bottom 10th percentile for rotation guard). Does it also not stand to reason that Ellis had easier defensive assignments coming off the bench? Agbaji started 60% of his games last year, Ellis started around 33%.
Ellis might be better than Agbaji on defense but it’s not as clear cut as you’re making it out to be.
PushDaRock wrote:MoneyBall wrote:PushDaRock wrote:
He started games in SAC as well, the point is his role here wouldn't be much different than it is there.
He started those games due to injuries, not because he's their #1 SG. He would be our #1 SG with the strong possibility of getting more than 24mpg. His role would definitely change.
He's a 12% USG guy. Unless you think he has a lot more in his offensive game he hasn't shown yet, it's unlikely his role would change much on this team.
Dr Positivity wrote:I think Barrett for Kuzma is looking likely.
PushDaRock wrote:Dalek wrote:PushDaRock wrote:
What exactly are we cashing in on? Do you think teams right now view the 2 years left on his deal as a positive or a negative?
He is not an expiring deal and coming off the best scoring season of his career efficiency-wise. I do think teams see value in RJ if they have room for a future deal with him.
The Kings seem ideal because of the Scott Perry connection - he drafted RJ in NY.
Brooklyn and Washington have capacity and need for a player like RJ.
Maybe the Bucks would take a swing thinking he can replace some of the lost guard play they had from Lillard.
Yeah, I think it's not likely you're getting value back for RJ. With the Kings, it would be more of a lateral move. Maybe you get a protected pick back in addition to some sort of Monk + filler package to make the deal work. While you save some AAV on Monk, you're also taking on an extra year with his player option he has. It's also a downgrade in talent.
You aren't getting anything useful from BKN or Washington who are both tanking. They aren't offering their picks for RJ and won't be trading any young players either.
The Bucks would be unloading Kuzma on us who has negative value both in contract and on the floor. We might get back a protected pick to take that on but you're essentially dumping RJ for nothing in this scenario.
Dalek wrote:PushDaRock wrote:Dalek wrote:
He is not an expiring deal and coming off the best scoring season of his career efficiency-wise. I do think teams see value in RJ if they have room for a future deal with him.
The Kings seem ideal because of the Scott Perry connection - he drafted RJ in NY.
Brooklyn and Washington have capacity and need for a player like RJ.
Maybe the Bucks would take a swing thinking he can replace some of the lost guard play they had from Lillard.
Yeah, I think it's not likely you're getting value back for RJ. With the Kings, it would be more of a lateral move. Maybe you get a protected pick back in addition to some sort of Monk + filler package to make the deal work. While you save some AAV on Monk, you're also taking on an extra year with his player option he has. It's also a downgrade in talent.
You aren't getting anything useful from BKN or Washington who are both tanking. They aren't offering their picks for RJ and won't be trading any young players either.
The Bucks would be unloading Kuzma on us who has negative value both in contract and on the floor. We might get back a protected pick to take that on but you're essentially dumping RJ for nothing in this scenario.
I mean why wouldn't the Wizards or Nets give up a pick(s) that they have surplus of, if they want RJ? He offers talent and leadership they don't have and he is in his prime. Toronto is in surplus of wing talent so we are operating from a different place.
I don't want Kuzma for TO, but it doesn't mean Milwaukee or any team for that matter deals one for one. You just need a third team to get things happening.
I do like the Kings best. I think Monk's contract can be one of the best value deals in the league. He is a great competitor, doesn't get hurt much, and can play two-ways and be a force. If you can get Devin Carter or Keegan Murray with Monk it's a homerun. Rookie deals with RFA status is optimal for our own team building and I like both players.
WuTang_OG wrote:?s=46&t=0YpMScWXY2zRUqR8fH-usg
WuTang_OG wrote:?s=46&t=0YpMScWXY2zRUqR8fH-usg