yosemiteben wrote:SWedd523 wrote:yosemiteben wrote:I just cannot accept that we had a solid core when 2/3 of that core shouldn't be expected to play more than half of a season.
Then stop Tyson Chandlering around, trade them, and actually start over with a rebuild
They're going to get a trade demand in the next year or so at this rate anyway
Well we did trade one, which is part of what prompted the complaint in the first place.
I personally am not at all concerned about a trade demand from Melo, until he stays healthy we're not getting good value for him anyway. We just saw this go down with Mark, we moved him and lots of folks are mad that it wasn't better value and think we should have kept him.
It seems very possible that they think Melo's long term health outlook is better than Mark, and also that he's more impactful when actually able to play, and so they are willing to ride the ride longer with him. But I also think they aren't committed to keeping Melo long term if he never shows an ability to stay healthy.
I think it is smart to not make moves that move us into the tax before we have reason to believe that at least the core parts of our foundation can make it through a season.
So are they rebuilding or in a holding pattern because they're too cowardly to actually do something?
At what point would you feel comfortable with them doing something? Three years of injury seasons in a row.
We'll just recycle all the talking points next year when Melo has another inevitable injury:
-He could play more if they were actually trying to win
-No need to risk it
-Theyre building for the future
Then next off-season we'll recycle these same talking points:
-Have to wait to see if they can stay healthy
-Can't make a decision until we see them play a full season
-They need another year to figure it out
-At least they added another "winner" in Bennett Stirtz/Thomas Haugh as a prize for their 22-60 record