ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 976
And1: 338
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1001 » by cmoss84 » Thu Jul 10, 2025 11:42 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
cmoss84 wrote:Giannis REALLY wants to stay in Milwaukee :roll:
Strike while the iron is hot and one up OKC extensions. Give Mil the best offer.
Randle, Naz, DDV, Rocco, and whatever picks.


We don't have picks.

Any Giannis offer that they'd even consider would likely have to start with McDaniels, Beringer and TSJ.

And we'd likely need to move Rudy to a 3rd team because I just can't see a Giannis/Rudy combo working.

I get your point. But what if Giannis wants out and that is their best offer? What if teams don't want to give up the farm?
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,438
And1: 5,964
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1002 » by winforlose » Thu Jul 10, 2025 11:44 pm

cmoss84 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
cmoss84 wrote:Giannis REALLY wants to stay in Milwaukee :roll:
Strike while the iron is hot and one up OKC extensions. Give Mil the best offer.
Randle, Naz, DDV, Rocco, and whatever picks.


We don't have picks.

Any Giannis offer that they'd even consider would likely have to start with McDaniels, Beringer and TSJ.

And we'd likely need to move Rudy to a 3rd team because I just can't see a Giannis/Rudy combo working.

I get your point. But what if Giannis wants out and that is their best offer? What if teams don't want to give up the farm?


The odds seem quite low. I agree that any move to bring GA here costs Jaden and Joan to start.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,927
And1: 3,611
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1003 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jul 10, 2025 11:45 pm

cmoss84 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
cmoss84 wrote:Giannis REALLY wants to stay in Milwaukee :roll:
Strike while the iron is hot and one up OKC extensions. Give Mil the best offer.
Randle, Naz, DDV, Rocco, and whatever picks.


We don't have picks.

Any Giannis offer that they'd even consider would likely have to start with McDaniels, Beringer and TSJ.

And we'd likely need to move Rudy to a 3rd team because I just can't see a Giannis/Rudy combo working.

I get your point. But what if Giannis wants out and that is their best offer? What if teams don't want to give up the farm?


Its Giannis...

A Top 3 player that is still 30 years old. We're not going to be bidding against ourselves.

If your offer is their best one, they'll just keep him and try again at the deadline or next year.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,438
And1: 5,964
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1004 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 11, 2025 12:08 am

BlacJacMac wrote:
cmoss84 wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
We don't have picks.

Any Giannis offer that they'd even consider would likely have to start with McDaniels, Beringer and TSJ.

And we'd likely need to move Rudy to a 3rd team because I just can't see a Giannis/Rudy combo working.

I get your point. But what if Giannis wants out and that is their best offer? What if teams don't want to give up the farm?


Its Giannis...

A Top 3 player that is still 30 years old. We're not going to be bidding against ourselves.

If your offer is their best one, they'll just keep him and try again at the deadline or next year.



It won’t be. There will always be better. GA is gonna get a lot of picks and a lot of young talent, probably before the 26/27 based on online rumors and comments.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,163
And1: 4,652
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1005 » by wolves_89 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 12:44 am

One minor roster issue to consider is whether Jesse Edwards ends up keeping his 2-way deal. I thought they might keep him due to Beringer/Zikarsky not being able to contribute in the NBA in the short term, but todays game showed me that Joan is already well ahead of Jesse. With that in mind having 2 center only guys on a 2-way may not be the best way to go.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,438
And1: 5,964
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1006 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 11, 2025 12:49 am

wolves_89 wrote:One minor roster issue to consider is whether Jesse Edwards ends up keeping his 2-way deal. I thought they might keep him due to Beringer/Zikarsky not being able to contribute in the NBA in the short term, but todays game showed me that Joan is already well ahead of Jesse. With that in mind having 2 center only guys on a 2-way may not be the best way to go.


I think we are hoping Rocco might be able to play the 4. Also we have enough depth at 2-4 I doubt it really hurts us. I do wonder why we are keeping JED around, but I don’t think it hurts us in the long run.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,721
And1: 23,065
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1007 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:55 am

wolves_89 wrote:One minor roster issue to consider is whether Jesse Edwards ends up keeping his 2-way deal. I thought they might keep him due to Beringer/Zikarsky not being able to contribute in the NBA in the short term, but todays game showed me that Joan is already well ahead of Jesse. With that in mind having 2 center only guys on a 2-way may not be the best way to go.

Of course Beringer is far ahead of Edwards, one was a first round pick at 18 years old while one was undrafted at 24 years old after 5 years of college.

However, I think with just how raw Zikarsky is, I don't even think about him being on the team this year. It's a full-on development year for him. Edwards isn't great, but I think he's at least adequate as a third center/sixth post player option.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 976
And1: 338
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1008 » by cmoss84 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 pm

I actually really like DDV. However, with Clark and TSJ ready to go, he seems like the best potential trade return. It would also clear up enough money for...Chris Paul.
CP and Mike seem like the perfect vets RD can learn from, as well as a perfect bridge to PG next year.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,721
And1: 23,065
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1009 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:57 pm

cmoss84 wrote:I actually really like DDV. However, with Clark and TSJ ready to go, he seems like the best potential trade return. It would also clear up enough money for...Chris Paul.
CP and Mike seem like the perfect vets RD can learn from, as well as a perfect bridge to PG next year.

Being open to trading Donte is fine. Wanting to trade Donte in order to bring in Chris Paul? Questionable.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,438
And1: 5,964
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1010 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:11 pm

DDV for Coby White would be great for us. I am just not sure they would make the trade or how much we need to pay Coby next year.
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 976
And1: 338
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1011 » by cmoss84 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:11 pm

Klomp wrote:
cmoss84 wrote:I actually really like DDV. However, with Clark and TSJ ready to go, he seems like the best potential trade return. It would also clear up enough money for...Chris Paul.
CP and Mike seem like the perfect vets RD can learn from, as well as a perfect bridge to PG next year.

Being open to trading Donte is fine. Wanting to trade Donte in order to bring in Chris Paul? Questionable.

Let's say something like:
DDV to Det
For
Paul, Klintman, '27 FRP, and an additional FRP
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,927
And1: 3,611
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1012 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:12 pm

winforlose wrote:DDV for Coby White would be great for us. I am just not sure they would make the trade or how much we need to pay Coby next year.


Far, far too much.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,552
And1: 2,922
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1013 » by Neeva » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:20 pm

Yea let someone else pay Coby White, he has some nice scoring games but far too many mediocre ones, he will be neutral value asset on his next contract, at best.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,426
And1: 881
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1014 » by Norseman79 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:50 pm

A guy I would love them to go after is Andrew Nembhard. DD, and what to land him?
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,793
And1: 5,283
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1015 » by minimus » Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:12 pm

Neeva wrote:Yea let someone else pay Coby White, he has some nice scoring games but far too many mediocre ones, he will be neutral value asset on his next contract, at best.

Yeah, he had a few good games against MIN. That's why MIN fans remember him. Given DDV 3pt shooting, effort, toughness and contract I think Donte is almost ideal backup comboguard for MIN.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,927
And1: 3,611
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1016 » by BlacJacMac » Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:16 pm

Neeva wrote:Yea let someone else pay Coby White, he has some nice scoring games but far too many mediocre ones, he will be neutral value asset on his next contract, at best.


He's not much of a distributor and a horrible defender.

1 trick pony.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,570
And1: 6,461
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1017 » by KGdaBom » Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:22 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:DDV for Coby White would be great for us. I am just not sure they would make the trade or how much we need to pay Coby next year.


Far, far too much.

Not too much at all. I'd like to get even more. :lol: :lol:
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,426
And1: 881
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1018 » by Norseman79 » Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:26 pm

I'm telling you, Nembhard for DD and fill is a win win
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,438
And1: 5,964
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1019 » by winforlose » Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:52 pm

Norseman79 wrote:I'm telling you, Nembhard for DD and fill is a win win


AN makes $18,102,000. DDV makes $11,990,000. What filler makes up that difference? Remember we cannot take back more money.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,721
And1: 23,065
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1020 » by Klomp » Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:30 am

So this is just me brainstorming right now....

We are currently $6,020,739 above the first apron right now, if my calculations using Spotrac are correct. We cannot aggregate salaries, unless a trade brings us below the first apron. So in theory, we could trade Randle and DiVincenzo and bring back a salary around $36,800,000. Probably a few million less actually, because I guess it would probably hard cap us at the first apron? Probably not really worth it at that point, unless the player is really underpaid.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves