redslastlaugh wrote:Just the shooting like you said. Bassey has made 3/13 3pt in his limited career. Garza has made 49/156 3pt in his limited career.
I think Celtics preference is a spacing, shooting center, ideally who defends which is why Al and KP were like dream boats. But there is like 5 of those guys in the whole league. Garza doesnt defend but Queta/Bassey dont shoot it at all. non-shooter, shooter, non-shooter sub pattern, maybe
Exactly. I think it's the combination of Garza's shooting + feel/basketball IQ/fundamentals that the Celtics like.
He's obviously been a better shooter and has more shooting upside than Bassey.
And Bassey just seems like your typical rim runner type of big who can catch the ball, dunk it, rebound and block shots. He doesn't appear to have much in terms of passing, feel, ability to put the ball on the floor, make advanced reads on either end.
Garza can shoot. He can put the ball on the floor, has a pretty deep bag of moves (facing up or posting up), he's skilled and a smart player.
Also, a direct quote in a Twitter DM from databallr, who runs a basketball stats/analytics site:
"Garza is averaging 27.6 points per 36 on 62% TS in his last 3 seasons with a monster o-reb rate while also spacing the floor. And he absolutely torched the g league in his stints there. I’ve watched him in the NBA, he’s clearly a very good offensive player with a great motor."
Here's one of his tweets about Garza:
Now of course, you have to kind of take this with a grain of salt, these per 36 stats for a guy like Garza who was only playing like 8 MPG. We obviously don't know for sure that his numbers would have held up on a much larger amount of MPG. But still, this at least is a clue into what may be some untapped potential in Garza, if given more of a role.