NZB2323 wrote:PistolPeteJR wrote:NZB2323 wrote:
AD was their top performer and they traded him.
Luka is their top performer and their future.
Lebron is not the CEO of the Lakers. He’s an employee who will be leaving the Lakers after this year.
Also, reports are coming out now that the Lakers did give Lebron a heads up after Luka, so this is a nothing burger.
AD was their top performer on some nights, not always. And between 2019-2025 (pre-AD trade), LeBron was the better player for the majority of the 6 seasons.
Anyway, we can agree to disagree at worst.
Okay, but now Lebron isn’t their top performer, he’s not the player they plan on building around, and he’s not their priority.
And I believe that the reporting later clarified that they informed LeBron as well, but even if they didn’t…there’s no reason to give preferential treatment to an employee who is leaving the company on the future plans of a company.
And despite not being their top-performer anymore (but still at worst #2), the fact he was head honcho for so long and is still head honcho from the standpoint of bringing the money in to LAL (until this year, where he's probably #2 with regards to $$$ returns to LAL), there is a respect element that is sustained. That's the way it works.
Let's assume for a second that someone like Cuban was selling the Mavs in Dirk's last season, with Luka there. You think he wouldn't have reached out to Dirk as well, though Dirk was even past washed at that point? Of course not. There's a respect factor there (ie. what Dirk did for that organization, winning, etc). And while LeBron isn't a Laker-lifer, that respect stands.