RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 8
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 02, 2025
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
Interested
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 7
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 20, 2025
-
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
Can I join?
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
- AEnigma
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,094
- And1: 5,931
- Joined: Jul 24, 2022
-
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
AEnigma wrote:If people also want to use this thread to touch on their approach in assessing peaks, that could help avoid some of the directionless back-and-forth we see when one party assumes their method of assessment is the same as another’s.
Another potential use for this thread could be thoughts on which players should have been included in 2022 or alternatively which players would be good to see included in this iteration (again, fingers crossed there is enough energy for us to hit 60 inductions this time).
As a reminder, here were the excluded players receiving votes in 2022’s fiftieth thread:
Paul Pierce, Elton Brand, Manu Ginobili, Kevin Love, Paul George, Jimmy Butler, Rudy Gobert, Jayson Tatum, Connie Hawkins, Dave Cowens, Bob McAdoo, Sidney Moncrief, Kevin McHale, John Stockton, Clyde Drexler, Reggie Miller, Dikembe Mutombo, Grant Hill.
Of those, I would definitely support Dave Cowens (wanted him in the top fifty back then), Jimmy Butler (feel stronger about him after the second Finals run), Jayson Tatum (improved), Paul George, Bob McAdoo, Kevin McHale, Connie Hawkins, and Manu Ginobili. Adding Shai as someone who would not have been considered previously but almost certainly will make the list now, and that leaves one spot for me. Currently leaning toward Reggie Miller, but would also consider Grant Hill, Vince Carter, Marques Johnson…
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,143
- And1: 1,875
- Joined: Aug 09, 2021
-
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
AEnigma wrote:AEnigma wrote:If people also want to use this thread to touch on their approach in assessing peaks, that could help avoid some of the directionless back-and-forth we see when one party assumes their method of assessment is the same as another’s.
Another potential use for this thread could be thoughts on which players should have been included in 2022 or alternatively which players would be good to see included in this iteration (again, fingers crossed there is enough energy for us to hit 60 inductions this time).
As a reminder, here were the excluded players receiving votes in 2022’s fiftieth thread:
Paul Pierce, Elton Brand, Manu Ginobili, Kevin Love, Paul George, Jimmy Butler, Rudy Gobert, Jayson Tatum, Connie Hawkins, Dave Cowens, Bob McAdoo, Sidney Moncrief, Kevin McHale, John Stockton, Clyde Drexler, Reggie Miller, Dikembe Mutombo, Grant Hill.
Of those, I would definitely support Dave Cowens (wanted him in the top fifty back then), Jimmy Butler (feel stronger about him after the second Finals run), Jayson Tatum (improved), Paul George, Bob McAdoo, Kevin McHale, Connie Hawkins, and Manu Ginobili. Adding Shai as someone who would not have been considered previously but almost certainly will make the list now, and that leaves one spot for me. Currently leaning toward Reggie Miller, but would also consider Grant Hill, Vince Carter, Marques Johnson…
I'd start to consider Lillard if there are more spots.
Fun fact I saw the other day is that Lillard snuck in a 4 year stretch in which he had the highest oDARKO in the league.
Spoiler:
This is mostly due to the well-timed declines of the 2010s stars as his peak on that end is still a couple of rungs below them, but still found that fairly impressive when you're talking about him compared to peaks like Kevin Love or Paul George.
Spoiler:
Case against Lillard would primarily be his defense. Can only really talk about his offensive impact numbers because the defensive side of things really knocks things down. For example, he was #1 in oRAPM and #753 in dRAPM in a five year study (2019-23), good for 11th overall. Speaking of which, damn PG is #1 in that span with the 15th best oRAPM and 5th best dRAPM. HIs defensive RAPM numbers were really good in his prime.
If somebody was high on offensive phenom production from their point guard and could wave away awful defense at the position, I think they could end up with a soft spot for Lillard.
Other tough part is the lack of a clear peak season. Maybe 2019? Does have the "outplaying peak PG13 h2h" argument going for him there
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
- Smoothbutta
- Freshman
- Posts: 77
- And1: 25
- Joined: Jan 31, 2011
- Location: California
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
I'd be interested as well but no worries if it's too late or I don't qualify
In any case I am curious as I can't find the boundary conditions for the project: since it is tied to single-season peak, is playoff/team success supposed to be considered or is that part subjective up to the voters? With '11 Dirk being ahead of '03 Tmac I assume we are meant to consider playoff success.
Also if 2 people nominate '16 Curry for example and 2 people nominate '17 Curry, does he essentially miss out on the candidate list if there are six other players with 3 votes for a single season? EDIT: Nevermind I see that you can put ('16 Curry > '17 Curry) and so-on.
In any case I am curious as I can't find the boundary conditions for the project: since it is tied to single-season peak, is playoff/team success supposed to be considered or is that part subjective up to the voters? With '11 Dirk being ahead of '03 Tmac I assume we are meant to consider playoff success.
Also if 2 people nominate '16 Curry for example and 2 people nominate '17 Curry, does he essentially miss out on the candidate list if there are six other players with 3 votes for a single season? EDIT: Nevermind I see that you can put ('16 Curry > '17 Curry) and so-on.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 219
- And1: 338
- Joined: Dec 31, 2018
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
Obviously a little late to the party, but is there an agreed upon set of criteria for determining greatest peak? I dont see anything in this thread or the voting thread that covers it -- or is it just up to the individual voter to determine what "greatest peak" means? Not sure if it was discussed/covered in previous iterations, and was just curious.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 156
- And1: 134
- Joined: Mar 24, 2025
-
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
runtmc wrote:Obviously a little late to the party, but is there an agreed upon set of criteria for determining greatest peak? I dont see anything in this thread or the voting thread that covers it -- or is it just up to the individual voter to determine what "greatest peak" means? Not sure if it was discussed/covered in previous iterations, and was just curious.
Totally depends on the voter criteria and reasoning. You just need to vote and layout some argument then the votes will count. Which ever player have more votes is the winner for each thread.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- Senior
- Posts: 538
- And1: 220
- Joined: Jun 17, 2022
- Location: Sydney
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
There are already a few criteria which have been brought up in the first pick.
1. Injuries. Some are turning off injuries and assuming players were full health. This should be fine if they played 60 games plus playoffs. But once they start to dip below that, I get a little harsher.
2. Peak in today’s game. Personally, I don’t care all that much. I’m ranking them relative to their peers. Sure, that means Mikan should be high, if you value his game. And he should probably go in the top 10-15 then.
3. Playoff weight. Some weigh playoffs 5x or 7x to regular season performances. I think I’m more in the 3x camp.
1. Injuries. Some are turning off injuries and assuming players were full health. This should be fine if they played 60 games plus playoffs. But once they start to dip below that, I get a little harsher.
2. Peak in today’s game. Personally, I don’t care all that much. I’m ranking them relative to their peers. Sure, that means Mikan should be high, if you value his game. And he should probably go in the top 10-15 then.
3. Playoff weight. Some weigh playoffs 5x or 7x to regular season performances. I think I’m more in the 3x camp.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,688
- And1: 9,176
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
I'm very interested! I've never done a peaks project before. I feel like I know my #1 and #2 and then there's a big mass of like 8 seasons that are all undifferentiated in the 3-10 range. I think this would be an excellent situation to research, listen, and learn while I come up with my own list.
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,688
- And1: 9,176
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: 2025 Peaks Project Interest Thread
ReggiesKnicks wrote:I'd like to join discussions, assuming this is higher-level basketball discussion than the GOAT thread on the General Board. That thread is low-level shouting.
PC forum project discussion is always miles better than random threads on the General Board.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,143
- And1: 1,875
- Joined: Aug 09, 2021
-
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
Pedantic pet peeve here but can we get the B in LeBron capitalized on the master post? Feels wrong to see it lowercase lol
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
- AEnigma
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,094
- And1: 5,931
- Joined: Jul 24, 2022
-
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
eminence wrote:I know it's just an example, and #2 is far too early, but I appreciate seeing it because I would appreciate '04 AK getting on the list somewhere this year. I'm not certain if that team wins 10 games without AK.
Moving this here.
Would you have included him on the 2022 list, and if so, over whom? What about the names I listed previously in that #50-60 range?
I probably have Kirilenko more as a top 75 peak, along with three of my previous honourable mentions, Bernard King, Ray Allen, yeah probably Lillard… oh, I just noticed Dolph Schayes never made any of these lists, so throw him in for the purposes of era representation, and possibly Paul Arizin while we are at it… and now we are getting into the area where I would at least consider 1994 Dikembe, 1992 Rodman, 2002 Rasheed, 2003 Kidd, 2007 BDiddy, 2005/08 Pierce, etc., but I am not sure how much energy people will have to stretch this to 75.
I think it is a pretty big obstacle for Kirilenko that he was basically functioning as a roleplayer in all his postseasons, so really all there is to judge is that laudatory 2004-06 regular season stretch. Again, definite top 75 peak imo, but cracking the top 50 or even 60 with no noteworthy postseason sample feels ambitious at first glance.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 189
- And1: 183
- Joined: Feb 08, 2024
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
Peaks
Kareem- 74
Only guy who could push Lebron. ATG Rim protection. Good D. Went 35/5/13 on +8rTS in the yoffs. Extremely Underrated PM, even late-prime
Kareem is extremely underrated.
D gap vs MJ is much bigger than O gap:
Russell- 62 GOAT D. Not much else. Skillset is unimpressive but the impact/winning is hard to ignore.
Duncan- 03 2nd or 3rd best defender OAT. Anchoring historic defenses as early as 1999:
Robinson overhyped. We see Duncan take over as the #1 early:
Underrated PM. Very good scoring. Goes from 23/13/4 on +5rTS to 25/15/5 on +5rTS. Notable rise. Even efficiency is a little better. Great two-way play.
Kareem- 74
Only guy who could push Lebron. ATG Rim protection. Good D. Went 35/5/13 on +8rTS in the yoffs. Extremely Underrated PM, even late-prime
Spoiler:
Kareem is extremely underrated.
D gap vs MJ is much bigger than O gap:
Spoiler:
Russell- 62 GOAT D. Not much else. Skillset is unimpressive but the impact/winning is hard to ignore.
Duncan- 03 2nd or 3rd best defender OAT. Anchoring historic defenses as early as 1999:
Spoiler:
Robinson overhyped. We see Duncan take over as the #1 early:
Spoiler:
Underrated PM. Very good scoring. Goes from 23/13/4 on +5rTS to 25/15/5 on +5rTS. Notable rise. Even efficiency is a little better. Great two-way play.
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,869
- And1: 2,582
- Joined: Sep 23, 2023
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
Don’t know how it’s possible but Jordan somehow became underrated on this board
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,667
- And1: 5,441
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: RealGM 2025 Greatest Peaks Project Discussion Thread
Special_Puppy wrote:Don’t know how it’s possible but Jordan somehow became underrated on this board
No, he's still overrated.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.