ImageImageImageImageImage

Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,352
And1: 2,721
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#121 » by Kanyewest » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:11 pm

It looks like the Hornets fans are still optimistic about Kon after he posted 16 points, 10 rebounds, and 5 assists.

Top comment from on a Reddit thread with his highlights

I was torn between him and Tre during the draft

I understand that Tre is a walking bucket, but Kon today showed me yet again that he’s a very good at things that might not appear on the box score

He’s going to make LaMelo and Brandon’s life all the more easier


I guess we'll see how it plays out in the regular season.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,441
And1: 8,660
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#122 » by AFM » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:18 pm

Kanyewest wrote:It looks like the Hornets fans are still optimistic about Kon after he posted 16 points, 10 rebounds, and 5 assists.

Top comment from on a Reddit thread with his highlights

I was torn between him and Tre during the draft

I understand that Tre is a walking bucket, but Kon today showed me yet again that he’s a very good at things that might not appear on the box score

He’s going to make LaMelo and Brandon’s life all the more easier


I guess we'll see how it plays out in the regular season.


I'm reading the comments on his latest highlight video, one commenter pointed out how slow with the ball he is and the top reply is: "being slow with the ball is actually an underrated skill, so many players play too fast and out of control". The word "COPE" comes to mind here.
prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,934
And1: 2,184
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#123 » by prime1time » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:46 pm

I like Tre but it's way too early to say other teams made the wrong decision. Kon is a really good player. He played at Duke and he's very good at fitting around ball dominant players. If Charlotte was going to move on from Melo I think they would have drafted Tre, but seeing how they are still building around Melo I don't think Tre was a good fit. Melo shot 21.2 times a game last year. Brandon Miller shot 18.2 times a game last year. How does Tre's style fit into that?

Kon took over games when Flagg was injured and Duke didn't miss a beat. He moves slow but he's still able to get to his spots. Let's just enjoy Tre and let this play out. We are literally only 2 summer league games in lol.
Despy
Freshman
Posts: 96
And1: 68
Joined: Jul 14, 2024

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#124 » by Despy » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:54 pm

I don't know how you can watch tre play and not see a natural scorer
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,603
And1: 9,104
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#125 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:18 am

What prime said!
TheBlackCzar
Junior
Posts: 315
And1: 182
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
     

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#126 » by TheBlackCzar » Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:27 am

prime1time wrote:I like Tre but it's way too early to say other teams made the wrong decision. Kon is a really good player. He played at Duke and he's very good at fitting around ball dominant players. If Charlotte was going to move on from Melo I think they would have drafted Tre, but seeing how they are still building around Melo I don't think Tre was a good fit. Melo shot 21.2 times a game last year. Brandon Miller shot 18.2 times a game last year. How does Tre's style fit into that?

Kon took over games when Flagg was injured and Duke didn't miss a beat. He moves slow but he's still able to get to his spots. Let's just enjoy Tre and let this play out. We are literally only 2 summer league games in lol.



What highly drafted white guy from Duke ever panned out into a star?
I'm truly curious because I don't know....
Despy
Freshman
Posts: 96
And1: 68
Joined: Jul 14, 2024

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#127 » by Despy » Wed Jul 16, 2025 4:59 am

The greatest player out of duke black or white was grant hill. grant hill

they talk about tre alot

;ab_channel=RingerNBA
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,930
And1: 9,312
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#128 » by queridiculo » Wed Jul 16, 2025 3:36 pm

AFM wrote:Tre Johnson >>>> Cooper Flagg numbers dont lie playa


You'd think NBA GMs would wise up and stop drafting dubies.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,143
And1: 7,905
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#129 » by Dat2U » Thu Jul 17, 2025 8:58 pm

prime1time wrote:I like Tre but it's way too early to say other teams made the wrong decision. Kon is a really good player. He played at Duke and he's very good at fitting around ball dominant players. If Charlotte was going to move on from Melo I think they would have drafted Tre, but seeing how they are still building around Melo I don't think Tre was a good fit. Melo shot 21.2 times a game last year. Brandon Miller shot 18.2 times a game last year. How does Tre's style fit into that?

Kon took over games when Flagg was injured and Duke didn't miss a beat. He moves slow but he's still able to get to his spots. Let's just enjoy Tre and let this play out. We are literally only 2 summer league games in lol.


Melo shot so much because once Miller went down, who else was going to take those shots? Josh Green? Moussa Diabate? You'd prefer more Miles Bridges' ISOs?
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,131
And1: 4,977
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#130 » by DCZards » Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:28 pm

Dat2U wrote:
prime1time wrote:I like Tre but it's way too early to say other teams made the wrong decision. Kon is a really good player. He played at Duke and he's very good at fitting around ball dominant players. If Charlotte was going to move on from Melo I think they would have drafted Tre, but seeing how they are still building around Melo I don't think Tre was a good fit. Melo shot 21.2 times a game last year. Brandon Miller shot 18.2 times a game last year. How does Tre's style fit into that?

Kon took over games when Flagg was injured and Duke didn't miss a beat. He moves slow but he's still able to get to his spots. Let's just enjoy Tre and let this play out. We are literally only 2 summer league games in lol.

Melo shot so much because once Miller went down, who else was going to take those shots? Josh Green? Moussa Diabate? You'd prefer more Miles Bridges' ISOs?
This post prompted me to look back at two games the Hornets played against the Zards in DC last season. I was at both games.

The first game was on 12/19 and LaMelo shot 11-32 and 3-18 on 3s.

They played a week later and Melo was 12-27 and 4-13 on 3s.

The Zards won both games. Bridges was the better Hornet player in both games.

Melo is a talented baller. But I’m not a fan. A chucker and always injured.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,441
And1: 8,660
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#131 » by AFM » Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:43 am

AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,441
And1: 8,660
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#132 » by AFM » Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:45 am

Second best player in the draft. Yeah I said it. Putting my crystal ball down now...
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,124
And1: 22,555
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#133 » by nate33 » Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:19 pm

AFM wrote:Second best player in the draft. Yeah I said it. Putting my crystal ball down now...

I don't know if he'll be the second best player, but I feel really good that we grabbed the best guy on the board at #6. That's all you can hope for.

And that video makes a real good point about Tre being totally unbothered by defenders right in his face. His quick, high release really does give him Devin Booker/Klay Thompson potential as a scorer. And his handle is real advanced for a rookie shooting guard. You can definitely see star potential there. He is much more than merely the next Malik Beasley, as I saw some scouts characterize him.

Factor his gym rat mindset, and I think he's the best prospect we've had since John Wall.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,131
And1: 4,977
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#134 » by DCZards » Fri Jul 18, 2025 1:41 pm

Don’t know where Tre will ultimately me ranked in this draft class. Cooper and Harper are thought to be on a higher tier; VJ has the body and athleticism to be a star once he gains more experience and polish; Kon has had some good SL games, especially last night.

But the Zards got a good one who could be in the mix for top 3 in this draft. As the above video shows, Tre is simply special when it comes to his talent and potential offensively.
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,057
And1: 9,437
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#135 » by I_Like_Dirt » Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:43 pm

DCZards wrote:Don’t know where Tre will ultimately me ranked in this draft class. Cooper and Harper are thought to be on a higher tier; VJ has the body and athleticism to be a star once he gains more experience and polish; Kon has had some good SL games, especially last night.

But the Zards got a good one who could be in the mix for top 3 in this draft. As the above video shows, Tre is simply special when it comes to his talent and potential offensively.


The "tiers" never play out that way in the end and generally get reevaluated repeatedly post-draft. I'm not so sure Flagg will be the best player from this draft - maybe, maybe not. It's not about always getting the absolute best possible player of the remaining players - it's great if it happens but it's impossible to predict. It's about getting as good as you can reasonably foresee and as long as you don't hit any landmines things usually turn out okay. I think Tre stands a pretty good chance of being a ~25 ppg scorer who fits well in the modern NBA team game a few seasons from now. If he winds up in that ballpark it won't matter how good or not any of the other picks wind up actually becoming.

Some of the kids taken after Tre that I feel have a decent chance of outplaying their draft position (they they probably won't all do it): CMB, Hansen, Sorber (if he can stay healthy), Kasparas. But there are a lot of others out there. Essengue has a ways to go but could be a serious star if he puts things together - same goes for Demin. This year may wind up being a draft a lot of teams are happy with.
Bucket! Bucket!
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#136 » by The Consiglieri » Sat Jul 19, 2025 2:55 pm

AFM wrote:
closg00 wrote:I wonder if we really would have drafted Fears if Tre was gone, the basketball gods really did us a solid after lottery debacle.


Can you imagine if we drafted Kon


No, it would be really interesting to find out who was on our board 5-10 or thereabouts (partly because I would have loved to play the part of Atlanta swindling New Orleans), but I don't think there was any universe we were stupid enough to have Kon in our top 6, but, maybe? I think Kon's gonna be fine, btw, he's not gonna be his iffy games in SL, I think the problem is, Kon is a value in that 10-15 zone, he is not remotely a value as a floor pick in the top 5 or 6 or 7 etc. That was and is beyond idiotic.

Were we ever interested in Fears? The skepticism seems justified.

It's pretty damn exciting to have got this pick right. I have been, and remain a skeptic in certain ways (defense and interior game), but I've seen an endless pile of reporting on scouts being very high on the kid down the stretch and there being a patently obvious way in which the kid is going to have a place in this league that at bare minimum will make him an adequate starter. The stories of first in last out obsessive work habits are exciting (the issues on D seem to have been explained at least in part on carrying the entire offensive load at Texas and playing insanely heavy minutes as a freshman: VJ, Ace, and Harper were close, at around 32 mpg, but Kon, Fears and Flagg all played close to 5 minutes less per game at 30), and in general, I get the sense he's definitely going to max out what he has and maybe build more, w/that knowledge in tow, there are only Fears, and Maluach really as guys I might have preferred at slot, and a trade up for Ace, which in retrospect looks scary. Fears and Maluach, however, are speculative and definitely carry riskier floors.

I'm much happier with Tre than I felt while looking at this draft with everyone the previous six months, I'm not entirely sold we definitely got the best case scenario, but the fact that Tre's stock has climbed a ton, and Bailey's has fallen, and Tre appears to have climbed ahead of VJ AND Bailey on some boards in June? Pretty damn exciting, and he totally looked the part this month too. I don't care much about SL, but the fact that SL just looked a lot like what people were already saying about him before is super promising.

Very excited.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,441
And1: 8,660
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#137 » by AFM » Sat Jul 19, 2025 2:57 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:
AFM wrote:
closg00 wrote:I wonder if we really would have drafted Fears if Tre was gone, the basketball gods really did us a solid after lottery debacle.


Can you imagine if we drafted Kon


No, it would be really interesting to find out who was on our board 5-10 or thereabouts (partly because I would have loved to play the part of Atlanta swindling New Orleans), but I don't think there was any universe we were stupid enough to have Kon in our top 6, but, maybe? I think Kon's gonna be fine, btw, he's not gonna be his iffy games in SL, I think the problem is, Kon is a value in that 10-15 zone, he is not remotely a value as a floor pick in the top 5 or 6 or 7 etc. That was and is beyond idiotic.

Were we ever interested in Fears? The skepticism seems justified.

It's pretty damn exciting to have got this pick right. I have been, and remain a skeptic in certain ways (defense and interior game), but I've seen an endless pile of reporting on scouts being very high on the kid down the stretch and there being a patently obvious way in which the kid is going to have a place in this league that at bare minimum will make him an adequate starter. The stories of first in last out obsessive work habits are exciting (the issues on D seem to have been explained at least in part on carrying the entire offensive load at Texas and playing insanely heavy minutes as a freshman: VJ, Ace, and Harper were close, at around 32 mpg, but Kon, Fears and Flagg all played close to 5 minutes less per game at 30), and in general, I get the sense he's definitely going to max out what he has and maybe build more, w/that knowledge in tow, there are only Fears, and Maluach really as guys I might have preferred at slot, and a trade up for Ace, which in retrospect looks scary. Fears and Maluach, however, are speculative and definitely carry riskier floors.

I'm much happier with Tre than I felt while looking at this draft with everyone the previous six months, I'm not entirely sold we definitely got the best case scenario, but the fact that Tre's stock has climbed a ton, and Bailey's has fallen, and Tre appears to have climbed ahead of VJ AND Bailey on some boards in June? Pretty damn exciting, and he totally looked the part this month too. I don't care much about SL, but the fact that SL just looked a lot like what people were already saying about him before is super promising.

Very excited.


Glad to see you come around a little :nod:
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#138 » by The Consiglieri » Sat Jul 19, 2025 3:07 pm

Dat2U wrote:
AFM wrote:
closg00 wrote:I wonder if we really would have drafted Fears if Tre was gone, the basketball gods really did us a solid after lottery debacle.


Can you imagine if we drafted Kon


I was like no way in hell, they sitting up here with a birds eye view of Corey Kispert and all his shortcomings, and yet still fantasizing over Kon Knueppel. I know, I know... not all white guys are alike but I'm confident in saying these two are! The same height & weight, similar skillset and characteristics. Slightly different body type & Kispert is older but basically a lot of direct parallels. I know spreadsheet FC was going crazy about "the perfect intersection of shooting and processing" but I've seen enough to know that being undersized, unathletic and having an inability to create your own shot is basically 3 strikes and your out as far as high level NBA prospect.

Low usage role players that cannot defend are fast becoming a dying breed. - I notice folks are quick to attack the high usage poor defenders recently but its really the low usage poor defenders that fail to hold much value - especially in the post season.

It was wild to see folks lock Kon in as a top 5 pick and on the same board, have Tre in many cases 5-10 spots lower. Tre grilled for his shot selection & defense while Kon was praised for his connectivity and shooting. I have my own reasons on why this was the case but this is not probably the best forum for that debate.


Personally, I think he will be fine as an NBA player, I just couldn't for the life of me understand why a horrible team at the top of the lottery would take him. I could totally understand why a team with a high pick but a great roster/team or a good one (Dallas/Philly/San Antonio/Phoenix/Houston) might want to draft him just for his "fit" and his ability to solve some problems, when they aren't, as Houston stupidly said, in the "development business anymore," Kon made sense for those teams, though he'd still be an idiotic reach in the top 8 or 9 or so (way too many intriguing ceiling plays like Bryant, Maluach, Fears, Essengue, Beringer, Sorber etc), at least you could see it, but why on earth teams as hopeless as Utah, Charlotte and Washington would be interested is utterly beyond me. How the hell is Kon going to turn around a team with no franchise players whatsoever? HOW? So immensely stupid, and Charlotte apparently decided to nix a trade largely agreed to with us because of a fear that Utah would take him?!?!

Just insane, and yeah, I agree w/you on him and Kispert. I think Kon is definitely more talented and versatile than Kispert, period, but I also think the problem with Kispert is still the problem with Kon. You should not be drafting players like Kispert and Kon when your roster is a barren wasteland devoid of elite players, and yet there we were, and there Charlotte was, ignoring logic, and trying to get their complimentary, 4th best on a team guy at the near top of the lottery in a very good draft!?!?! Never thought we'd take him because the FO, for the first time ever in my watching life, seems to have a clue (in fairness, they seemed to consistently get the picks right at slot circa 1992-1995 so there's that).
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#139 » by The Consiglieri » Sat Jul 19, 2025 3:12 pm

Dat2U wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:It was wild to see folks lock Kon in as a top 5 pick and on the same board, have Tre in many cases 5-10 spots lower. Tre grilled for his shot selection & defense while Kon was praised for his connectivity and shooting. I have my own reasons on why this was the case but this is not probably the best forum for that debate.


I mean, Kon went top 5 above Tre.

You were also confident in Sharife Cooper, wanted to trade future 1sts+ a top 10 pick for Jaden Ivey, called him the next Ja Morant, called Scoot Henderson the next John Wall, wanted to pick Cam Whitmore 8th overall, who was just given away for a couple of 2nd round picks.

But yet, you seem to be insinuating people are racist or something for disagreeing with you?


It goes a little deeper than race... a lot of its preconceived biases that are built in even if were not self-aware of it. The pure shooter & aggressive scorer is viewed as a shot jacker with Cam Thomas tendencies even though he can really pass and has ideal length to defend. The spot up shooter is labeled as the best shooting prospect ever, a connective genius with creation upside but can't shoot off the dribble or create in space but those skills are still seen in a very positive light. Not saying this is purposeful ... but I am getting to the point where I feel like I can point out the inherent biases in scouting some guys have - Especially when you look a player from many different vantage points.

You also love doing this gotcha bs like a jealous female but you fail to realize its a two way street. No one is perfect at this. We ALL have are clear misses - You were the founding member of the 'Johnny Davis, Wizards PG of the future' fan club so please be quiet and know your proper role in the order of things. :wink:


What I found really interesting in that aggregated rankings of scouts vs analytics fans was how Kon was so so so damn high on tape grinding, scouts boards, and never remotely as high on analytics types boards, I don't put that down as a race thing, though it could be, I put it down to tape grinders falling in love with details and inflating their relative importance, whereas an asset of analytics people is that they don't sweat the small stuff, and inflate it beyond all measure, moneyball in reverse style (reminds me of tape grinders who love rb's who blow people up in the open field and underrate rb's who avoid big hits).
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Tre Johnson: welcome to the DMV 

Post#140 » by The Consiglieri » Sat Jul 19, 2025 3:21 pm

AFM wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:
AFM wrote:
Can you imagine if we drafted Kon


No, it would be really interesting to find out who was on our board 5-10 or thereabouts (partly because I would have loved to play the part of Atlanta swindling New Orleans), but I don't think there was any universe we were stupid enough to have Kon in our top 6, but, maybe? I think Kon's gonna be fine, btw, he's not gonna be his iffy games in SL, I think the problem is, Kon is a value in that 10-15 zone, he is not remotely a value as a floor pick in the top 5 or 6 or 7 etc. That was and is beyond idiotic.

Were we ever interested in Fears? The skepticism seems justified.

It's pretty damn exciting to have got this pick right. I have been, and remain a skeptic in certain ways (defense and interior game), but I've seen an endless pile of reporting on scouts being very high on the kid down the stretch and there being a patently obvious way in which the kid is going to have a place in this league that at bare minimum will make him an adequate starter. The stories of first in last out obsessive work habits are exciting (the issues on D seem to have been explained at least in part on carrying the entire offensive load at Texas and playing insanely heavy minutes as a freshman: VJ, Ace, and Harper were close, at around 32 mpg, but Kon, Fears and Flagg all played close to 5 minutes less per game at 30), and in general, I get the sense he's definitely going to max out what he has and maybe build more, w/that knowledge in tow, there are only Fears, and Maluach really as guys I might have preferred at slot, and a trade up for Ace, which in retrospect looks scary. Fears and Maluach, however, are speculative and definitely carry riskier floors.

I'm much happier with Tre than I felt while looking at this draft with everyone the previous six months, I'm not entirely sold we definitely got the best case scenario, but the fact that Tre's stock has climbed a ton, and Bailey's has fallen, and Tre appears to have climbed ahead of VJ AND Bailey on some boards in June? Pretty damn exciting, and he totally looked the part this month too. I don't care much about SL, but the fact that SL just looked a lot like what people were already saying about him before is super promising.

Very excited.


Glad to see you come around a little :nod:


I've been back peddling pretty hard since 24-48 hours of the draft. Just found way too many people I respect around buying in completely and a ton of first in, last out reporting which suggests he'll do the work necessary to address some of the holes. I definitely think I was wrong on his ceiling and floor. I have no problem admitting I was wrong. The only area I am in wait and see on is whether he can fix the flaws or not: I know the work habits are supposedly there, but it still needs to happen. Otherwise he'l always have limitations that are too damn large to make him a true franchise caliber elite talent, but all the evidence to this point suggests he wants and will do the work....So, definitely think I was wrong on him.

Return to Washington Wizards