hugepatsfan wrote:Jon1798 wrote:If fully healthy, lineup would likely be:
PG- Murray/ Fears/ Jose
SG- Herb/ Poole/ Hawkins
SF- Murphy/ Bey/ Peavy
PF- Zion/ Queen/ Matkovic
C- Missi/ Looney/ Dickinson
And that’s a very very strong roster. Calling that anything close to bottom five in the league is absurd. Now “healthy roster” is not something we are familiar with soooo.
In the sports phrase dictionary they'd put this lineup as the example for "team is less than the sum of its parts". Not a good mix of players at all. Bottom 5 probably harsh at first glance but not much better.
Yeah I agree, just not seeing it.
Murray isn't gonna be the same player right off the bat, if at all. Alvarado is cool but not a starter.
Murphy was awesome last year, but can it translate with winning basketball if he's THE guy? Or even the 2nd guy?
Herb, great role player and glue guy, but is he more than your 4th or 5th starter?
I know they got blasted for the Queen trade and I actually really like him as a player BUT how does he fit here? Are him and Zion playing together?
What version of Jordan Poole are they getting?
Overall the team just doesnt have enough shooting even if all players are firing on all cylinders and healthy.
I got
1. OKC
2. Denver
3. Houston
4. Minny
5. Clippers
6. Lakers
7. Warriors
All definitely ahead of them.
8. Memphis
9. Dallas
10. Spurs
SHOULD all be better.
Then theyre in the next tier with Portland and the Kings as teams that could surprise people if everything clicks right.
It's really hard for me to figure out how they get above that unless Zion and Murphy are both All-Stars.