doogie_hauser wrote:Yeah great decision.
Hope this move kick starts the struggling Blazers with some positive energy and momentum going into next season despite Dame not available next season.
Genuinely, even from hundreds of miles away from Portland and just listening to sports media, the vibe of that city is off the charts right now. No one is under any illusion that this means championships (or even playoffs), but just the feels alone are crazy. You have some media guys nearly in tears (admittedly, the one I'm thinking of is
actually close friends with Dame and kind of made his career of that like a poor mans Windy) and my 75+ year old mother who couldn't give two **** about sports even texted me less than an hour after news broke to tell me about it.
People really poo-poo on what players mean to cities a lot. The Booker extension for example... crazy contract, almost impossible that deal is gonna be worth it on the court, but man, when you got a really great player who is a community staple, you give that dude whatever he wants, he for all intense and purposes runs the city.
In COVID days, Portland was one of the strictest cities and Oregon the strictest states in the country with their restrictions. WWAAYYYY worse than California to extreme levels. People I met from around the country in states like Utah and Idaho at that time took pity on us saying "you guys are doing COVID rough", and they were right! I bring this up to say, Dame actually helped the city loosen those rules because he wanted fans back in the arena and the city started making some exceptions. During the Floyd protests, Dame was front and center of the protest lines going across the bridge, whatever your politics, it was a **** iconic scene at a major historical moment for the city.
So what Dame means to Portland just as a city and outside of basketball is more than most people truly understand (and even some Blazer fans who are purely focused on cap and scores/wins).
All this to say, there are some legitimate questions to be asked here from a roster construction standpoint. It's completely fair to say... this makes no **** sense... and it doesn't. You can squint and see sommmmmeeee logic in it. They clearly wanted leadership and felt that was a major hole in the roster. They got rid of a guy who clearly wasn't all bought in with Ayton. They got rid of Simons who was talented and a good dude, but is not and never will be any sort of lockerroom leader. He's just not that guy. Then they bring in Holiday and Lillard, arguably some of the best lockerroom leaders of this past generation.
You can also take this as a sign they still believe in Scoot but see a clear issue that he lacks maturity and knowhow for being a professional, and in that respect, they're going all-in for him with the best possible mentors he can ever wish for. So this sure seems like a "Hey dude, we're giving you all the parts, a full IKEA instruction booklet AND a YouTube tutorial... If you cant put together this desk with all this help, we're gonna find someone who can" kind of year for FO to Scoot.
But outside of those items, this roster is kind of a mess and all over the place if you're just looking at it logically and objectively. The books are clean though, not in the tax for any real reason, only one really bad contact with Grant and all expire before young guys extensions kick in. And for a team for sale, Cronin has injected just about as much interest and passion humanly possible to excite new owners. He didn't blow up the asset chest for a star like Zion, he's got now an entire country of China hanging on every game if Yang stays healthy for the season and they got a franchise legend returning that's going to get national media attention.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang