OriginalRed wrote:cupcakesnake wrote:OriginalRed wrote:Hardly a needle mover but a solid pick up. He's basically just a slightly better version of Gabe Vincent, solid defender who can shoot the three at a decent clip. At that contract and in a very specific role he can help.
"Slightly better version of Gabe Vincent" is pretty rude to a former DPOY who averaged 15 and 6 during the playoffs on a team that went to the finals. I assume you're saying he's washed due to injury?
Flatly, yes. He's not the same Marcus Smart that was an All Defensive Guard and DPOY. Injuries have worn his body down immensely. It's a solid pick up because the Lakers need more defensive guards when they have Luka and Reaves but they're getting basically what they get in Gabe Vincent; a solid defender who can shoot and give you 15-20 solid back up minutes.
Last year he was out with thumb injuries. He struggled with knee injuries the year before, but they were just knee contusions (no structural damage). In his on-court minutes last year, he looked fine in terms of mobility. Marcus Smart could continue to get hit with injuries but he's 31 and doesn't have a career-altering injury. I'm curious why you think he's washed due to injury. Is it because he's missed so much time the past 2 seasons? Or do you have a reason to think he's legitimately declined?
Some guys do hit their 30s pretty banged up and don't extend their prime. That is possible with Smart. I think there's plenty of reason to wait and see how he looks before calling him dead.
Stylistically, I just don't see the comparison to Gabe Vincent. Smart is much more erratic as a shooter, but is a way better playmaker. Defensively, Vincent has never been in the same conversations as Smart. I get that you're saying he's a slight upgrade on Vincent, which I probably agree with, but I don't think they're similar players. If Smart is good to go, he should be a massive difference maker on the defensive end.