Spree2Houston wrote:I would take a flyer on Blake Wesley. He was just waived by Washington. I liked his upside coming out of college.
We don't have apron space or roster spots for flyers.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Spree2Houston wrote:I would take a flyer on Blake Wesley. He was just waived by Washington. I liked his upside coming out of college.
Jonathan2347 wrote:Seems like there is traction with Ben Simmons. We can definitely use him for 15 mpg off the bench. Can playmaker, defend, and rebound.
Brunson/Clarkson
Duece/Hart
Bridges/Yabu
OG/Simmons
Towns/Mitch
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
A good coach wouldn't have the entire bench unit on at the same time. The point is to mix and match and stagger lineups.BowlRips wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:Seems like there is traction with Ben Simmons. We can definitely use him for 15 mpg off the bench. Can playmaker, defend, and rebound.
Brunson/Clarkson
Duece/Hart
Bridges/Yabu
OG/Simmons
Towns/Mitch
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
I really don't think in the modern NBA you can have a bench lineup made up of 3/5 non-shooters, especially if the other 2 players are average shooters at best. Wouldn't get the Simmons move unless theres more to come
You should see lineups ofBowlRips wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:Seems like there is traction with Ben Simmons. We can definitely use him for 15 mpg off the bench. Can playmaker, defend, and rebound.
Brunson/Clarkson
Duece/Hart
Bridges/Yabu
OG/Simmons
Towns/Mitch
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
I really don't think in the modern NBA you can have a bench lineup made up of 3/5 non-shooters, especially if the other 2 players are average shooters at best. Wouldn't get the Simmons move unless theres more to come
Jonathan2347 wrote:A good coach wouldn't have the entire bench unit on at the same time. The point is to mix and match and stagger lineups.BowlRips wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:Seems like there is traction with Ben Simmons. We can definitely use him for 15 mpg off the bench. Can playmaker, defend, and rebound.
Brunson/Clarkson
Duece/Hart
Bridges/Yabu
OG/Simmons
Towns/Mitch
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
I really don't think in the modern NBA you can have a bench lineup made up of 3/5 non-shooters, especially if the other 2 players are average shooters at best. Wouldn't get the Simmons move unless theres more to come
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
Nazrmohamed wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Nazrmohamed wrote:
Well up until last season, which for what is worth was our best season the Knicks were known to be grit, play above our "on paper" talent level and played defense
Either way we have a new coach now. In theory he should be an upgrade/better fit for the
current roster construction of this team than Thibs was.
I agree. I was just answering the question. This last season as crazy as it sounds felt like our worst season. I felt like we had great talent yet couldn't beat anyone hood all year. I spent most of the season pissed off and then we had that run in the playoffs. Beating the Celtics was just so crazy. But I just cant forget how bad it felt all season. Going like 0-11 vs teams ahead of us in the standings and not too great vs teams over .500 in general. I know depth and rookie play get all the attention around here but I dont even think Thibs managed the starting 5 that great its amazing we somehow beat enough bad teams to still end up the 3rd seed. Then obviously we played well ( overall) in the playoffs.
I agree though. I think Brown will have us play better
WargamesX wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:A good coach wouldn't have the entire bench unit on at the same time. The point is to mix and match and stagger lineups.BowlRips wrote:
I really don't think in the modern NBA you can have a bench lineup made up of 3/5 non-shooters, especially if the other 2 players are average shooters at best. Wouldn't get the Simmons move unless theres more to come
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
Thibs really didnt do that a lot so I could see why people forgot….
Even when we were deep he liked to have the bench guys come in for synergy and to speed the game up due to them having more energy. It was one of those subtle decisions that led to certain players having high minutes.
KnixinSix wrote:WargamesX wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:A good coach wouldn't have the entire bench unit on at the same time. The point is to mix and match and stagger lineups.
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
Thibs really didnt do that a lot so I could see why people forgot….
Even when we were deep he liked to have the bench guys come in for synergy and to speed the game up due to them having more energy. It was one of those subtle decisions that led to certain players having high minutes.
Thibs didn't do that much because the starters were playing closer to 40 minutes a night each lololol
There was no way to get your starters that many minutes if he is playing the entire bench at the same time.
![]()
![]()
BowlRips wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:Seems like there is traction with Ben Simmons. We can definitely use him for 15 mpg off the bench. Can playmaker, defend, and rebound.
Brunson/Clarkson
Duece/Hart
Bridges/Yabu
OG/Simmons
Towns/Mitch
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
I really don't think in the modern NBA you can have a bench lineup made up of 3/5 non-shooters, especially if the other 2 players are average shooters at best. Wouldn't get the Simmons move unless theres more to come
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Think Ben will ultimately end up in PHX. They don't really have an established PG on the roster right now unless you count Booker as a PG. They have enough shooting around him that he wont have to worry as much about spacing and they can use his defense.
With us, the fit inherently gets a little wonkier with our bench's shooting ability. There's almost no pathway for him to start with us unless Mike Brown gets super creative or *gulps* desperate at some point![]()
I think he has a much more clear path to playing time there, then he will here. They'll probably be somewhat competitive in the play in race and he can maybe play himself into a bigger deal next year.
With us he's basically going to be a 10-20 minute a night defensive specialist who can up the pace a bit on offense.
WaltFrazier wrote:BowlRips wrote:Jonathan2347 wrote:Seems like there is traction with Ben Simmons. We can definitely use him for 15 mpg off the bench. Can playmaker, defend, and rebound.
Brunson/Clarkson
Duece/Hart
Bridges/Yabu
OG/Simmons
Towns/Mitch
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app
I really don't think in the modern NBA you can have a bench lineup made up of 3/5 non-shooters, especially if the other 2 players are average shooters at best. Wouldn't get the Simmons move unless theres more to come
Simmons aside, I don't totally get the thinking that Hart is more suited to a bench role. You need shooting off the bench too. A 6'4 guy needs to be a shooter not just a rebounder
WaltFrazier wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Think Ben will ultimately end up in PHX. They don't really have an established PG on the roster right now unless you count Booker as a PG. They have enough shooting around him that he wont have to worry as much about spacing and they can use his defense.
With us, the fit inherently gets a little wonkier with our bench's shooting ability. There's almost no pathway for him to start with us unless Mike Brown gets super creative or *gulps* desperate at some point![]()
I think he has a much more clear path to playing time there, then he will here. They'll probably be somewhat competitive in the play in race and he can maybe play himself into a bigger deal next year.
With us he's basically going to be a 10-20 minute a night defensive specialist who can up the pace a bit on offense.
But is Simmons motivated to go where he'd get more minutes?
I don't know if he's driven by playing time, or wanting to win, or what drives him. If anything
KnicksGadfly wrote:I heard Malcolm Brogdon listed as an option. I’d prefer a wing but he’s not a bad option.