JasonStern wrote:NGL I often forget Brogdon even had a stint as a Blazer.DusterBuster wrote:Ok... processing... but I see this. Blazers basically paid for an asset here. Dame gets to rehab here, and then get to use him for another trade asset? I'm sure this is a deal to move him to a contender when he's healthy... which if he's good he's worth a 1st round pick.
He's 35. Rehabbing a ruptured achilles - and he didn't play defense before. Has a 3 year contract with a no trade clause. 90% chance he just plays this out, spends time with his family, and retires an all-time Blazer great.Capn'O wrote:DusterBuster wrote:Ok... processing... but I see this. Blazers basically paid for an asset here. Dame gets to rehab here, and then get to use him for another trade asset? I'm sure this is a deal to move him to a contender when he's healthy... which if he's good he's worth a 1st round pick.
I think it's more likely they move Holiday if they can find a taker. Dame rides off into the sunset with PDX. Holiday supposedly doesn't want to be here and Dame does.
But I'm of the mind that he never _really_ wanted to leave.
He wanted the team to get better. Then instead of using the #3 pick in a trade to bring any help in, they drafted the potential point guard of the future. I would have done the same.zzaj wrote:So a NTC and player option...can't really say I understand it from a team building standpoint. Just when it seems like your team is establishing an identity and direction you go and muck it up?
Everyone can have their opinion on Drexler being better (I agree), Walton being better (before my time and he trashed the franchise for a while after his short tenure), but Dame is legit top 3. Top 75 player of all-time. Huge fan draw. And actually wants to play for us. And signed for an MLE contract. I don't see how any of this mucks up anything.
The Jrue trade was weird. And paying Ayton $25M to go play with the Lakers was not ideal (but that did give the space to sign Dame). Simons and Ayton were off the books in one season. Were totally playable players. And now the Blazers have limited flexibility cap-wise as contracts expire. If Jrue was younger, sure. But we might be looking at a washed Jrue and washed Dame in 2 seasons.
The “Muck Up” is the Blazers are apparently leaning into a defense first philosophy, with a Top5 youngest team in the league. Additionally, Sharpe and Scoot are still wild cards—neither has proved the can be a bonafide NBA starter on a winning team. If everything goes well, and Scoot/Sharpe take nice jumps this coming year, who plays? I PROMISE you Chauncey has no intention of putting Lillard/Jrue on the bench.